
Core i3-1305U
Popular choices:

Core i3-10305T
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core i3-1305U
2023Why buy it
- ✅+25% larger total L3 cache (10 MB vs 8 MB).
- ✅Draws 15W instead of 35W, a 20W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on FCBGA1744 with DDR5 support instead of LGA1200 and DDR4.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel UHD Graphics, while Core i3-10305T needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.
Core i3-10305T
2021Why buy it
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (8,512 vs 8,634).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (8 MB vs 10 MB).
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $143 MSRP, while Core i3-1305U mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌133.3% higher power demand at 35W vs 15W.
- ❌Older platform position on LGA1200 with DDR4, while Core i3-1305U moves to FCBGA1744 and DDR5.
Core i3-1305U
2023Core i3-10305T
2021Why buy it
- ✅+25% larger total L3 cache (10 MB vs 8 MB).
- ✅Draws 15W instead of 35W, a 20W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on FCBGA1744 with DDR5 support instead of LGA1200 and DDR4.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel UHD Graphics, while Core i3-10305T needs a discrete GPU.
Why buy it
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (8,512 vs 8,634).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (8 MB vs 10 MB).
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $143 MSRP, while Core i3-1305U mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌133.3% higher power demand at 35W vs 15W.
- ❌Older platform position on LGA1200 with DDR4, while Core i3-1305U moves to FCBGA1744 and DDR5.
Quick Answers
So, is Core i3-1305U better than Core i3-10305T?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core i3-1305U | Core i3-10305T |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 183 FPS | 175 FPS |
| medium | 150 FPS | 138 FPS |
| high | 122 FPS | 109 FPS |
| ultra | 100 FPS | 86 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 150 FPS | 147 FPS |
| medium | 119 FPS | 115 FPS |
| high | 96 FPS | 90 FPS |
| ultra | 78 FPS | 71 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 84 FPS | 69 FPS |
| medium | 72 FPS | 58 FPS |
| high | 58 FPS | 45 FPS |
| ultra | 45 FPS | 36 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core i3-1305U | Core i3-10305T |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 179 FPS | 212 FPS |
| medium | 147 FPS | 176 FPS |
| high | 133 FPS | 159 FPS |
| ultra | 116 FPS | 124 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 152 FPS | 183 FPS |
| medium | 128 FPS | 152 FPS |
| high | 119 FPS | 137 FPS |
| ultra | 103 FPS | 111 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 113 FPS | 144 FPS |
| medium | 99 FPS | 123 FPS |
| high | 85 FPS | 100 FPS |
| ultra | 72 FPS | 75 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core i3-1305U | Core i3-10305T |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 216 FPS | 213 FPS |
| medium | 216 FPS | 213 FPS |
| high | 216 FPS | 213 FPS |
| ultra | 216 FPS | 213 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 216 FPS | 213 FPS |
| medium | 216 FPS | 213 FPS |
| high | 216 FPS | 213 FPS |
| ultra | 216 FPS | 213 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 216 FPS | 213 FPS |
| medium | 216 FPS | 213 FPS |
| high | 216 FPS | 213 FPS |
| ultra | 174 FPS | 213 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core i3-1305U | Core i3-10305T |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 216 FPS | 213 FPS |
| medium | 216 FPS | 213 FPS |
| high | 216 FPS | 213 FPS |
| ultra | 216 FPS | 213 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 216 FPS | 213 FPS |
| medium | 216 FPS | 213 FPS |
| high | 216 FPS | 213 FPS |
| ultra | 216 FPS | 213 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 216 FPS | 213 FPS |
| medium | 216 FPS | 213 FPS |
| high | 216 FPS | 213 FPS |
| ultra | 216 FPS | 213 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i3-1305U and Core i3-10305T

Core i3-1305U
Core i3-1305U
The Core i3-1305U is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-U (2023) architecture. It features 5 cores and 6 threads. Base frequency is 1.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.5 GHz. L3 cache: 10 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1744. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-5200, DDR4-3200, LPDDR4x-4267. Passmark benchmark score: 8,634 points. Launch price was $309.

Core i3-10305T
Core i3-10305T
The Core i3-10305T is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 16 March 2021 (4 years ago). It is based on the Comet Lake-R (2021) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1200. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2666. Passmark benchmark score: 8,512 points. Launch price was $143.
Processing Power
The Core i3-1305U packs 5 cores / 6 threads, while the Core i3-10305T offers 4 cores / 8 threads — the Core i3-1305U has 1 more core. Boost clocks reach 4.5 GHz on the Core i3-1305U versus 4 GHz on the Core i3-10305T — a 11.8% clock advantage for the Core i3-1305U (base: 1.6 GHz vs 3 GHz). The Core i3-1305U uses the Raptor Lake-U (2023) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Core i3-10305T uses Comet Lake-R (2021) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core i3-1305U scores 8,634 against the Core i3-10305T's 8,512 — a 1.4% lead for the Core i3-1305U. L3 cache: 10 MB (total) on the Core i3-1305U vs 8 MB (total) on the Core i3-10305T.
| Feature | Core i3-1305U | Core i3-10305T |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 5 / 6+25% | 4 / 8 |
| Boost Clock | 4.5 GHz+13% | 4 GHz |
| Base Clock | 1.6 GHz | 3 GHz+87% |
| L3 Cache | 10 MB (total)+25% | 8 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 1.25 MB (per core)+400% | 256 kB (per core) |
| Process | Intel 7 nm-50% | 14 nm |
| Architecture | Raptor Lake-U (2023) | Comet Lake-R (2021) |
| PassMark | 8,634+1% | 8,512 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 4,388 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 1,960 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 1,900 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Core i3-1305U uses the FCBGA1744 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Core i3-10305T uses LGA1200 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core i3-1305U | Core i3-10305T |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FCBGA1744 | LGA1200 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0+67% | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-5200 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 96 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | No | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 20 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d (Core i3-1305U) / not specified (Core i3-10305T). The Core i3-1305U includes integrated graphics (Intel UHD Graphics), while the Core i3-10305T requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i3-1305U targets Budget Laptop.
| Feature | Core i3-1305U | Core i3-10305T |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | — |
| IGPU Model | Intel UHD Graphics | — |
| Unlocked | No | — |
| AVX-512 | No | — |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | — |
| Target Use | Budget Laptop | — |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












