
Core i3-1305U

Ryzen 5 PRO 2400G
Core i3-1305U vs Ryzen 5 PRO 2400G Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Core i3-1305U vs Ryzen 5 PRO 2400G FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Core i3-1305U vs Ryzen 5 PRO 2400G: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Core i3-1305U
2023Why buy it
- ✅+1.3% higher PassMark.
- ✅+150% larger total L3 cache (10 MB vs 4 MB).
- ✅Draws 15W instead of 65W, a 50W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on FCBGA1744 with DDR5 support instead of AM4 and DDR4.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 5 PRO 2400G across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
Ryzen 5 PRO 2400G
2018Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +3.8% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (8,527 vs 8,634).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (4 MB vs 10 MB).
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $193 MSRP, while Core i3-1305U mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌333.3% higher power demand at 65W vs 15W.
- ❌Older platform position on AM4 with DDR4, while Core i3-1305U moves to FCBGA1744 and DDR5.
Quick Answers
So, is Core i3-1305U better than Ryzen 5 PRO 2400G?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core i3-1305U vs Ryzen 5 PRO 2400G Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i3-1305U
The Core i3-1305U is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-U (2023) architecture. It features 5 cores and 6 threads. Base frequency is 1.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.5 GHz. L3 cache: 10 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1744. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-5200, DDR4-3200, LPDDR4x-4267. Passmark benchmark score: 8,634 points. Launch price was $309.


Ryzen 5 PRO 2400G
The Ryzen 5 PRO 2400G is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 10 May 2018 (7 years ago). It is based on the Raven Ridge (2017−2019) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 3.9 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 8,527 points. Launch price was $169.
Processing Power
The Core i3-1305U packs 5 cores / 6 threads, while the Ryzen 5 PRO 2400G offers 4 cores / 8 threads — the Core i3-1305U has 1 more core. Boost clocks reach 4.5 GHz on the Core i3-1305U versus 3.9 GHz on the Ryzen 5 PRO 2400G — a 14.3% clock advantage for the Core i3-1305U (base: 1.6 GHz vs 3.6 GHz). The Core i3-1305U uses the Raptor Lake-U (2023) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Ryzen 5 PRO 2400G uses Raven Ridge (2017−2019) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core i3-1305U scores 8,634 against the Ryzen 5 PRO 2400G's 8,527 — a 1.2% lead for the Core i3-1305U. L3 cache: 10 MB (total) on the Core i3-1305U vs 4 MB (total) on the Ryzen 5 PRO 2400G.
| Feature | Core i3-1305U | Ryzen 5 PRO 2400G |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 5 / 6+25% | 4 / 8 |
| Boost Clock | 4.5 GHz+15% | 3.9 GHz |
| Base Clock | 1.6 GHz | 3.6 GHz+125% |
| L3 Cache | 10 MB (total)+150% | 4 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 1.25 MB (per core)+150% | 512 kB (per core) |
| Process | Intel 7 nm-50% | 14 nm |
| Architecture | Raptor Lake-U (2023) | Raven Ridge (2017−2019) |
| PassMark | 8,634+1% | 8,527 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 4,388 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 1,960 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 1,900 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Core i3-1305U uses the FCBGA1744 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Ryzen 5 PRO 2400G uses AM4 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core i3-1305U | Ryzen 5 PRO 2400G |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FCBGA1744 | AM4 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0+67% | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-5200 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 96 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | No | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 20 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d (Core i3-1305U) / not specified (Ryzen 5 PRO 2400G). The Core i3-1305U includes integrated graphics (Intel UHD Graphics), while the Ryzen 5 PRO 2400G requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i3-1305U targets Budget Laptop.
| Feature | Core i3-1305U | Ryzen 5 PRO 2400G |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | — |
| IGPU Model | Intel UHD Graphics | — |
| Unlocked | No | — |
| AVX-512 | No | — |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | — |
| Target Use | Budget Laptop | — |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.













