
Core i3-13100T

Xeon E5-2685 v3
Core i3-13100T vs Xeon E5-2685 v3 Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Core i3-13100T vs Xeon E5-2685 v3 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Core i3-13100T vs Xeon E5-2685 v3: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Core i3-13100T
2023Why buy it
- ✅Costs $1,956 less on MSRP ($134 MSRP vs $2,090 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 1442.1% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 95.5 vs 6.2 PassMark/$ ($134 MSRP vs $2,090 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 35W instead of 120W, a 85W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on LGA1700 with DDR5 support instead of LGA2011-3 and DDR4.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon E5-2685 v3 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (12,798 vs 12,944).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (12 MB vs 30 MB).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon E5-2685 v3, which brings 12 cores / 12 threads.
Xeon E5-2685 v3
2014Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +11.8% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+150% larger total L3 cache (30 MB vs 12 MB).
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 12 cores / 12 threads.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 6.2 vs 95.5 PassMark/$ ($2,090 MSRP vs $134 MSRP).
- ❌242.9% higher power demand at 120W vs 35W.
- ❌Older platform position on LGA2011-3 with DDR4, while Core i3-13100T moves to LGA1700 and DDR5.
Quick Answers
So, is Xeon E5-2685 v3 better than Core i3-13100T?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core i3-13100T vs Xeon E5-2685 v3 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i3-13100T
The Core i3-13100T is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.2 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 12,798 points. Launch price was $134.

Xeon E5-2685 v3
The Xeon E5-2685 v3 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Haswell-EP (2014−2015) architecture. It features 12 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 2.6 GHz, with boost up to 3.3 GHz. L3 cache: 30 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011-3. Thermal design power (TDP): 120 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-1600, DDR4-1866, DDR4-2133. Passmark benchmark score: 12,944 points. Launch price was $800.
Processing Power
The Core i3-13100T packs 4 cores / 8 threads, while the Xeon E5-2685 v3 offers 12 cores / 12 threads — the Xeon E5-2685 v3 has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.2 GHz on the Core i3-13100T versus 3.3 GHz on the Xeon E5-2685 v3 — a 24% clock advantage for the Core i3-13100T (base: 2.5 GHz vs 2.6 GHz). The Core i3-13100T uses the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Xeon E5-2685 v3 uses Haswell-EP (2014−2015) (22 nm). In PassMark, the Core i3-13100T scores 12,798 against the Xeon E5-2685 v3's 12,944 — a 1.1% lead for the Xeon E5-2685 v3. L3 cache: 12 MB (total) on the Core i3-13100T vs 30 MB (total) on the Xeon E5-2685 v3.
| Feature | Core i3-13100T | Xeon E5-2685 v3 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 4 / 8 | 12 / 12+200% |
| Boost Clock | 4.2 GHz+27% | 3.3 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2.5 GHz | 2.6 GHz+4% |
| L3 Cache | 12 MB (total) | 30 MB (total)+150% |
| L2 Cache | 1.25 MB (per core) | 256K (per core)+20380% |
| Process | Intel 7 nm-68% | 22 nm |
| Architecture | Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) | Haswell-EP (2014−2015) |
| PassMark | 12,798 | 12,944+1% |
Memory & Platform
The Core i3-13100T uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Xeon E5-2685 v3 uses LGA2011-3 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core i3-13100T | Xeon E5-2685 v3 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1700 | LGA2011-3 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0 | PCIe 5.0 |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Core i3-13100T was priced at $134, while the Xeon E5-2685 v3 came in at $2090. On launch pricing ($134 vs $2090), Core i3-13100T was $1956 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i3-13100T delivers 95.5 pts/$ vs 6.2 pts/$ for the Xeon E5-2685 v3 — making the Core i3-13100T the 175.6% better value option.
| Feature | Core i3-13100T | Xeon E5-2685 v3 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $134-94% | $2090 |
| Performance per Dollar | 95.5+1440% | 6.2 |
| Release Date | 2023 | 2014 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.














