
Core i3-1315UE

Xeon E5-2450 v2
Core i3-1315UE vs Xeon E5-2450 v2 Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Core i3-1315UE vs Xeon E5-2450 v2 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Core i3-1315UE vs Xeon E5-2450 v2: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Core i3-1315UE
2023Why buy it
- ✅Draws 15W instead of 95W, a 80W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on FCBGA1744 with DDR5 support instead of LGA1356 and older memory support.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel UHD Graphics, while Xeon E5-2450 v2 needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon E5-2450 v2 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (9,003 vs 9,057).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (10 MB vs 20 MB).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon E5-2450 v2, which brings 8 cores / 16 threads.
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $312 MSRP, while Xeon E5-2450 v2 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
Xeon E5-2450 v2
2013Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +3.4% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+100% larger total L3 cache (20 MB vs 10 MB).
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 8 cores / 16 threads.
Trade-offs
- ❌533.3% higher power demand at 95W vs 15W.
- ❌Older platform position on LGA1356, while Core i3-1315UE moves to FCBGA1744 and DDR5.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Core i3-1315UE can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Quick Answers
So, is Xeon E5-2450 v2 better than Core i3-1315UE?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core i3-1315UE vs Xeon E5-2450 v2 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i3-1315UE
The Core i3-1315UE is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-U (2023) architecture. It features 6 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 1.2 GHz, with boost up to 4.5 GHz. L3 cache: 10 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1744. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 9,003 points. Launch price was $149.

Xeon E5-2450 v2
The Xeon E5-2450 v2 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Ivy Bridge-EN (2013−2014) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 3.3 GHz. L3 cache: 20 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1356. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 9,057 points. Launch price was $800.
Processing Power
The Core i3-1315UE packs 6 cores / 8 threads, while the Xeon E5-2450 v2 offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Xeon E5-2450 v2 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.5 GHz on the Core i3-1315UE versus 3.3 GHz on the Xeon E5-2450 v2 — a 30.8% clock advantage for the Core i3-1315UE (base: 1.2 GHz vs 2.5 GHz). The Core i3-1315UE uses the Raptor Lake-U (2023) architecture (10 nm), while the Xeon E5-2450 v2 uses Ivy Bridge-EN (2013−2014) (22 nm). In PassMark, the Core i3-1315UE scores 9,003 against the Xeon E5-2450 v2's 9,057 — a 0.6% lead for the Xeon E5-2450 v2. L3 cache: 10 MB (total) on the Core i3-1315UE vs 20 MB (total) on the Xeon E5-2450 v2.
| Feature | Core i3-1315UE | Xeon E5-2450 v2 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 6 / 8 | 8 / 16+33% |
| Boost Clock | 4.5 GHz+36% | 3.3 GHz |
| Base Clock | 1.2 GHz | 2.5 GHz+108% |
| L3 Cache | 10 MB (total) | 20 MB (total)+100% |
| L2 Cache | 1.25 MB (per core)+400% | 256 kB (per core) |
| Process | 10 nm-55% | 22 nm |
| Architecture | Raptor Lake-U (2023) | Ivy Bridge-EN (2013−2014) |
| PassMark | 9,003 | 9,057 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 2,000 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 2,100 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Core i3-1315UE uses the FCBGA1744 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Xeon E5-2450 v2 uses LGA1356 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core i3-1315UE | Xeon E5-2450 v2 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FCBGA1744 | LGA1356 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0+67% | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-5200 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 96 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | No | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 20 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d (Core i3-1315UE) / not specified (Xeon E5-2450 v2). The Core i3-1315UE includes integrated graphics (Intel UHD Graphics), while the Xeon E5-2450 v2 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i3-1315UE targets Mainstream Laptop.
| Feature | Core i3-1315UE | Xeon E5-2450 v2 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | — |
| IGPU Model | Intel UHD Graphics | — |
| Unlocked | No | — |
| AVX-512 | No | — |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | — |
| Target Use | Mainstream Laptop | — |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.













