PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i3-1315UE vs Xeon E5-2670 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i3-1315UE vs Xeon E5-2670: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i3-1315UE

2023

Why buy it

✅Costs $1,240 less on MSRP ($312 MSRP vs $1,552 MSRP).
✅Delivers 403.1% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 28.9 vs 5.7 PassMark/$ ($312 MSRP vs $1,552 MSRP).
✅Draws 15W instead of 115W, a 100W reduction.
✅Newer platform on FCBGA1744 with DDR5 support instead of LGA2011 and older memory support.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel UHD Graphics, while Xeon E5-2670 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Smaller total L3 cache (10 MB vs 20 MB).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon E5-2670, which brings 8 cores / 16 threads and 40 PCIe lanes.

Xeon E5-2670

2012

Why buy it

✅+100% larger total L3 cache (20 MB vs 10 MB).
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 8 cores / 16 threads, plus 40 PCIe lanes vs 20.
✅100% more PCIe lanes (40 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (8,901 vs 9,003).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 5.7 vs 28.9 PassMark/$ ($1,552 MSRP vs $312 MSRP).
❌666.7% higher power demand at 115W vs 15W.
❌Older platform position on LGA2011, while Core i3-1315UE moves to FCBGA1744 and DDR5.
❌No integrated graphics, while Core i3-1315UE can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i3-1315UE better than Xeon E5-2670?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon E5-2670 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Core i3-1315UE is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Core i3-1315UE is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 2.3% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i3-1315UE is the stronger fit. You are getting 1.1% better PassMark, backed by 6 cores and 8 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i3-1315UE is the better buy right now. Core i3-1315UE comes in $1,240 cheaper on MSRP at $312 MSRP versus $1,552 MSRP, and it still gives you a 2.3% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 403.1% better value on MSRP (28.9 vs 5.7 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i3-1315UE makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2023 vs 2012), a healthier platform with FCBGA1744 and DDR5 instead of LGA2011, and more multi-core headroom with 6 cores / 8 threads instead of 8/16. That gives you a healthier platform runway for motherboard, RAM, and later CPU upgrades.

Core i3-1315UE vs Xeon E5-2670 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i3-1315UE

The Core i3-1315UE is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-U (2023) architecture. It features 6 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 1.2 GHz, with boost up to 4.5 GHz. L3 cache: 10 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1744. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 9,003 points. Launch price was $149.

Xeon E5-2670

The Xeon E5-2670 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 6 March 2012 (13 years ago). It is based on the Sandy Bridge-EP (2012) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.6 GHz, with boost up to 3.3 GHz. L3 cache: 20480 kB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 115 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 8,901 points. Launch price was $145.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i3-1315UE packs 6 cores / 8 threads, while the Xeon E5-2670 offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Xeon E5-2670 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.5 GHz on the Core i3-1315UE versus 3.3 GHz on the Xeon E5-2670 — a 30.8% clock advantage for the Core i3-1315UE (base: 1.2 GHz vs 2.6 GHz). The Core i3-1315UE uses the Raptor Lake-U (2023) architecture (10 nm), while the Xeon E5-2670 uses Sandy Bridge-EP (2012) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Core i3-1315UE scores 9,003 against the Xeon E5-2670's 8,901 — a 1.1% lead for the Core i3-1315UE. L3 cache: 10 MB (total) on the Core i3-1315UE vs 20480 kB (total) on the Xeon E5-2670.

Feature	Core i3-1315UE	Xeon E5-2670
Cores / Threads	6 / 8	8 / 16+33%
Boost Clock	4.5 GHz+36%	3.3 GHz
Base Clock	1.2 GHz	2.6 GHz+117%
L3 Cache	10 MB (total)	20480 kB (total)+100%
L2 Cache	1.25 MB (per core)+400%	256 kB (per core)
Process	10 nm-69%	32 nm
Architecture	Raptor Lake-U (2023)	Sandy Bridge-EP (2012)
PassMark	9,003+1%	8,901
Geekbench 6 Single	2,000	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	2,100	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i3-1315UE uses the FCBGA1744 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Xeon E5-2670 uses LGA2011 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-5200 on the Core i3-1315UE versus DDR3-1600 on the Xeon E5-2670 — the Core i3-1315UE supports 225% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Xeon E5-2670 supports up to 384 GB of RAM compared to 96 GB — 300% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Core i3-1315UE) vs 4 (Xeon E5-2670). PCIe lanes: 20 (Core i3-1315UE) vs 40 (Xeon E5-2670) — the Xeon E5-2670 offers 20 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: Raptor Lake-U (Core i3-1315UE) and Intel X79,Intel C602 (Xeon E5-2670).

Feature	Core i3-1315UE	Xeon E5-2670
Socket	FCBGA1744	LGA2011
PCIe Generation	PCIe 5.0+150%	PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR5-5200+225%	DDR3-1600
Max RAM Capacity	96 GB	384 GB+300%
RAM Channels	2	4+100%
ECC Support	No	Yes
PCIe Lanes	20	40+100%

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Both support VT-x, VT-d virtualization. The Core i3-1315UE includes integrated graphics (Intel UHD Graphics), while the Xeon E5-2670 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i3-1315UE targets Mainstream Laptop, Xeon E5-2670 targets Server.

Feature	Core i3-1315UE	Xeon E5-2670
Integrated GPU	Yes	No
IGPU Model	Intel UHD Graphics	—
Unlocked	No	No
AVX-512	No	No
Virtualization	VT-x, VT-d	VT-x, VT-d
Target Use	Mainstream Laptop	Server

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Core i3-1315UE was priced at $312, while the Xeon E5-2670 came in at $1552. On launch pricing ($312 vs $1552), Core i3-1315UE was $1240 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i3-1315UE delivers 28.9 pts/$ vs 5.7 pts/$ for the Xeon E5-2670 — making the Core i3-1315UE the 133.7% better value option.

Feature	Core i3-1315UE	Xeon E5-2670
MSRP	$312-80%	$1552
Performance per Dollar	28.9+407%	5.7
Release Date	2023	2012

Search Core i3-1315UE on Amazon

Search Xeon E5-2670 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.