Core i3-14100 vs EPYC 7301

Core i3-14100 vs EPYC 7301 Performance Spectrum

Core i3-14100

4 / 8

15,213

+1.5%

14,991

0.0%

Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 370

Ryzen 9 8940HX

Ryzen 9 9950X3D

Ryzen Threadripper 9960X

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i3-14100 vs EPYC 7301 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i3-14100 vs EPYC 7301: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i3-14100

2024

Why buy it

✅+1.5% higher PassMark.
✅Draws 60W instead of 170W, a 110W reduction.
✅Newer platform on LGA1700 with DDR5 support instead of TR4 and DDR4.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than EPYC 7301 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Smaller total L3 cache (12 MB vs 64 MB).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than EPYC 7301, which brings 16 cores / 32 threads.
❌Launch MSRP is still $134 MSRP, while EPYC 7301 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.

EPYC 7301

2017

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +5.4% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+433.3% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 12 MB).
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 16 cores / 32 threads.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (14,991 vs 15,213).
❌183.3% higher power demand at 170W vs 60W.
❌Older platform position on TR4 with DDR4, while Core i3-14100 moves to LGA1700 and DDR5.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i3-14100 better than EPYC 7301?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. EPYC 7301 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Core i3-14100 is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i3-14100 is the stronger fit. You are getting 1.5% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 8 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i3-14100 is the better buy right now. Core i3-14100 comes in at an unclear MSRP at $134 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you 1.5% better PassMark. The compromise is that EPYC 7301 is still the better pure gaming CPU with a 5.4% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (113.5 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i3-14100 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2024 vs 2017), a healthier platform with LGA1700 and DDR5 instead of TR4, and more multi-core headroom with 4 cores / 8 threads instead of 16/32. That gives you a healthier platform runway for motherboard, RAM, and later CPU upgrades.

Core i3-14100 vs EPYC 7301 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i3-14100

The Core i3-14100 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 8 January 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-R (2023−2025) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.7 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 60 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 15,213 points. Launch price was $134.

EPYC 7301

The EPYC 7301 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 29 June 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Naples (2017−2018) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 2.7 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: TR4. Thermal design power (TDP): 170 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Eight-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 14,991 points. Launch price was $825.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i3-14100 packs 4 cores / 8 threads, while the EPYC 7301 offers 16 cores / 32 threads — the EPYC 7301 has 12 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.7 GHz on the Core i3-14100 versus 2.7 GHz on the EPYC 7301 — a 54.1% clock advantage for the Core i3-14100 (base: 3.5 GHz vs 2.2 GHz). The Core i3-14100 uses the Raptor Lake-R (2023−2025) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the EPYC 7301 uses Naples (2017−2018) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core i3-14100 scores 15,213 against the EPYC 7301's 14,991 — a 1.5% lead for the Core i3-14100. L3 cache: 12 MB (total) on the Core i3-14100 vs 64 MB (total) on the EPYC 7301.

Feature	Core i3-14100	EPYC 7301
Cores / Threads	4 / 8	16 / 32+300%
Boost Clock	4.7 GHz+74%	2.7 GHz
Base Clock	3.5 GHz+59%	2.2 GHz
L3 Cache	12 MB (total)	64 MB (total)+433%
L2 Cache	1.25 MB (per core)	512K (per core)+40860%
Process	Intel 7 nm-50%	14 nm
Architecture	Raptor Lake-R (2023−2025)	Naples (2017−2018)
PassMark	15,213+1%	14,991

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i3-14100 uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the EPYC 7301 uses TR4 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.