Core i3-14100 vs Xeon E5-4667 v3

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i3-14100 vs Xeon E5-4667 v3 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i3-14100 vs Xeon E5-4667 v3: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i3-14100

2024

Why buy it

✅Draws 60W instead of 135W, a 75W reduction.
✅Newer platform on LGA1700 with DDR5 support instead of LGA2011 and DDR4.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (15,213 vs 15,397).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (12 MB vs 40 MB).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon E5-4667 v3, which brings 16 cores / 32 threads.
❌
4.7% HIGHER MSRP
$134 MSRPvs$128 MSRP

Xeon E5-4667 v3

2015

Why buy it

✅+1.2% higher PassMark.
✅+233.3% larger total L3 cache (40 MB vs 12 MB).
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 16 cores / 32 threads.
✅Costs $6 less on MSRP ($128 MSRP vs $134 MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌125% higher power demand at 135W vs 60W.
❌Older platform position on LGA2011 with DDR4, while Core i3-14100 moves to LGA1700 and DDR5.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i3-14100 better than Xeon E5-4667 v3?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon E5-4667 v3 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Core i3-14100 is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon E5-4667 v3 is the stronger fit. You are getting 1.2% better PassMark, backed by 16 cores and 32 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 233.3% larger total L3 cache (40 MB vs 12 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i3-14100 is still the faster CPU overall, but Xeon E5-4667 v3 is easier to justify if budget matters more than peak performance. Core i3-14100 comes in 4.7% more expensive on MSRP at $134 MSRP versus $128 MSRP, and it still gives you a 1.5% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. The compromise is that Xeon E5-4667 v3 is still stronger for heavier multi-core work with 1.2% better PassMark. Xeon E5-4667 v3 is also 6.0% better value on MSRP (120.3 vs 113.5 PassMark/$), which is why it can still make sense for tighter-budget builds on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i3-14100 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2024 vs 2015) and a healthier platform with LGA1700 and DDR5 instead of LGA2011. That gives you a healthier platform runway for motherboard, RAM, and later CPU upgrades.

Core i3-14100 vs Xeon E5-4667 v3 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i3-14100

The Core i3-14100 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 8 January 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-R (2023−2025) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.7 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 60 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 15,213 points. Launch price was $134.

Xeon E5-4667 v3

The Xeon E5-4667 v3 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Haswell-EP (2014−2015) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 2.9 GHz. L3 cache: 40 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 135 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 15,397 points. Launch price was $800.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i3-14100 packs 4 cores / 8 threads, while the Xeon E5-4667 v3 offers 16 cores / 32 threads — the Xeon E5-4667 v3 has 12 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.7 GHz on the Core i3-14100 versus 2.9 GHz on the Xeon E5-4667 v3 — a 47.4% clock advantage for the Core i3-14100 (base: 3.5 GHz vs 2 GHz). The Core i3-14100 uses the Raptor Lake-R (2023−2025) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Xeon E5-4667 v3 uses Haswell-EP (2014−2015) (22 nm). In PassMark, the Core i3-14100 scores 15,213 against the Xeon E5-4667 v3's 15,397 — a 1.2% lead for the Xeon E5-4667 v3. L3 cache: 12 MB (total) on the Core i3-14100 vs 40 MB (total) on the Xeon E5-4667 v3.

Feature	Core i3-14100	Xeon E5-4667 v3
Cores / Threads	4 / 8	16 / 32+300%
Boost Clock	4.7 GHz+62%	2.9 GHz
Base Clock	3.5 GHz+75%	2 GHz
L3 Cache	12 MB (total)	40 MB (total)+233%
L2 Cache	1.25 MB (per core)	256K (per core)+20380%
Process	Intel 7 nm-68%	22 nm
Architecture	Raptor Lake-R (2023−2025)	Haswell-EP (2014−2015)
PassMark	15,213	15,397+1%

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i3-14100 uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Xeon E5-4667 v3 uses LGA2011 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Core i3-14100	Xeon E5-4667 v3
Socket	LGA1700	LGA2011
PCIe Generation	PCIe 5.0+67%	PCIe 3.0

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Core i3-14100 was priced at $134, while the Xeon E5-4667 v3 came in at $128. On launch pricing ($134 vs $128), Xeon E5-4667 v3 was $6 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i3-14100 delivers 113.5 pts/$ vs 120.3 pts/$ for the Xeon E5-4667 v3 — making the Xeon E5-4667 v3 the 5.8% better value option.

Feature	Core i3-14100	Xeon E5-4667 v3
MSRP	$134	$128-4%
Performance per Dollar	113.5	120.3+6%
Release Date	2024	2015

Search Core i3-14100 on Amazon

Search Xeon E5-4667 v3 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.