Core i3-14100F vs Ryzen 7 PRO 2700

Core i3-14100F vs Ryzen 7 PRO 2700 Performance Spectrum

Core i3-14100F

4 / 8

15,381

+0.3%

15,342

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX

Ryzen 9 8940HX

Ryzen 9 9950X3D

Ryzen Threadripper 9960X

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i3-14100F vs Ryzen 7 PRO 2700 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i3-14100F vs Ryzen 7 PRO 2700: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i3-14100F

2024

Why buy it

✅+0.3% higher PassMark.
✅Costs $190 less on MSRP ($109 MSRP vs $299 MSRP).
✅Delivers 175.0% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 141.1 vs 51.3 PassMark/$ ($109 MSRP vs $299 MSRP).
✅Draws 58W instead of 65W, a 7W reduction.
✅Newer platform on LGA1700 with DDR5 support instead of AM4 and DDR4.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 PRO 2700 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Smaller total L3 cache (12 MB vs 16 MB).

Ryzen 7 PRO 2700

2018

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +3.5% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+33.3% larger total L3 cache (16 MB vs 12 MB).

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (15,342 vs 15,381).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 51.3 vs 141.1 PassMark/$ ($299 MSRP vs $109 MSRP).
❌Older platform position on AM4 with DDR4, while Core i3-14100F moves to LGA1700 and DDR5.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i3-14100F better than Ryzen 7 PRO 2700?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Ryzen 7 PRO 2700 is ahead with a 3.5% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Core i3-14100F pulls ahead with 0.3% better PassMark. Ryzen 7 PRO 2700 also has the bigger cache pool with 33.3% larger total L3 cache (16 MB vs 12 MB).

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i3-14100F is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.3% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 8 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i3-14100F is the better buy right now. Core i3-14100F comes in $190 cheaper on MSRP at $109 MSRP versus $299 MSRP, and it still gives you 0.3% better PassMark. The compromise is that Ryzen 7 PRO 2700 is still the better pure gaming CPU with a 3.5% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 175.0% better value on MSRP (141.1 vs 51.3 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper. That said, if you already own a compatible AM4 + DDR4 setup, Ryzen 7 PRO 2700 can still make sense as a platform-matched option because it avoids a motherboard and RAM swap, but on MSRP alone you would want to find it meaningfully cheaper in real-world listings before that path becomes easy to justify.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i3-14100F makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2024 vs 2018), a healthier platform with LGA1700 and DDR5 instead of AM4, and more multi-core headroom with 4 cores / 8 threads instead of 8/16. That gives you a healthier platform runway for motherboard, RAM, and later CPU upgrades.

Core i3-14100F vs Ryzen 7 PRO 2700 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i3-14100F

The Core i3-14100F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 8 January 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-R (2023−2025) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.7 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 58 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 15,381 points. Launch price was $109.

Ryzen 7 PRO 2700

The Ryzen 7 PRO 2700 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 19 September 2018 (7 years ago). It is based on the Zen+ (2018−2019) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 4.1 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 15,342 points. Launch price was $299.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i3-14100F packs 4 cores / 8 threads, while the Ryzen 7 PRO 2700 offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Ryzen 7 PRO 2700 has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.7 GHz on the Core i3-14100F versus 4.1 GHz on the Ryzen 7 PRO 2700 — a 13.6% clock advantage for the Core i3-14100F (base: 3.5 GHz vs 3.2 GHz). The Core i3-14100F uses the Raptor Lake-R (2023−2025) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Ryzen 7 PRO 2700 uses Zen+ (2018−2019) (12 nm). In PassMark, the Core i3-14100F scores 15,381 against the Ryzen 7 PRO 2700's 15,342 — a 0.3% lead for the Core i3-14100F. L3 cache: 12 MB (total) on the Core i3-14100F vs 16 MB (total) on the Ryzen 7 PRO 2700.

Feature	Core i3-14100F	Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
Cores / Threads	4 / 8	8 / 16+100%
Boost Clock	4.7 GHz+15%	4.1 GHz
Base Clock	3.5 GHz+9%	3.2 GHz
L3 Cache	12 MB (total)	16 MB (total)+33%
L2 Cache	1.25 MB (per core)	512K (per core)+40860%
Process	Intel 7 nm-42%	12 nm
Architecture	Raptor Lake-R (2023−2025)	Zen+ (2018−2019)
PassMark	15,381	15,342

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i3-14100F uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Ryzen 7 PRO 2700 uses AM4 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Core i3-14100F	Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
Socket	LGA1700	AM4
PCIe Generation	PCIe 5.0+67%	PCIe 3.0

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Core i3-14100F was priced at $109, while the Ryzen 7 PRO 2700 came in at $299. On launch pricing ($109 vs $299), Core i3-14100F was $190 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i3-14100F delivers 141.1 pts/$ vs 51.3 pts/$ for the Ryzen 7 PRO 2700 — making the Core i3-14100F the 93.3% better value option.

Feature	Core i3-14100F	Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP	$109-64%	$299
Performance per Dollar	141.1+175%	51.3
Release Date	2024	2018

Search Core i3-14100F on Amazon

Search Ryzen 7 PRO 2700 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.