Core i3-14100F vs Xeon E5-4667 v3

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i3-14100F vs Xeon E5-4667 v3 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i3-14100F vs Xeon E5-4667 v3: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i3-14100F

2024

Why buy it

✅Costs $19 less on MSRP ($109 MSRP vs $128 MSRP).
✅Delivers 17.3% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 141.1 vs 120.3 PassMark/$ ($109 MSRP vs $128 MSRP).
✅Draws 58W instead of 135W, a 77W reduction.
✅Newer platform on LGA1700 with DDR5 support instead of LGA2011 and DDR4.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (15,381 vs 15,397).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (12 MB vs 40 MB).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon E5-4667 v3, which brings 16 cores / 32 threads.

Xeon E5-4667 v3

2015

Why buy it

✅+0.1% higher PassMark.
✅+233.3% larger total L3 cache (40 MB vs 12 MB).
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 16 cores / 32 threads.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 120.3 vs 141.1 PassMark/$ ($128 MSRP vs $109 MSRP).
❌132.8% higher power demand at 135W vs 58W.
❌Older platform position on LGA2011 with DDR4, while Core i3-14100F moves to LGA1700 and DDR5.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i3-14100F better than Xeon E5-4667 v3?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon E5-4667 v3 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Core i3-14100F is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon E5-4667 v3 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.1% better PassMark, backed by 16 cores and 32 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 233.3% larger total L3 cache (40 MB vs 12 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i3-14100F is the better buy right now. Core i3-14100F comes in $19 cheaper on MSRP at $109 MSRP versus $128 MSRP, and it still gives you a 1.3% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. The compromise is that Xeon E5-4667 v3 is still stronger for heavier multi-core work with 0.1% better PassMark. It is also 17.3% better value on MSRP (141.1 vs 120.3 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i3-14100F makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2024 vs 2015) and a healthier platform with LGA1700 and DDR5 instead of LGA2011. That gives you a healthier platform runway for motherboard, RAM, and later CPU upgrades.

Core i3-14100F vs Xeon E5-4667 v3 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i3-14100F

The Core i3-14100F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 8 January 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-R (2023−2025) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.7 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 58 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 15,381 points. Launch price was $109.

Xeon E5-4667 v3

The Xeon E5-4667 v3 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Haswell-EP (2014−2015) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 2.9 GHz. L3 cache: 40 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 135 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 15,397 points. Launch price was $800.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i3-14100F packs 4 cores / 8 threads, while the Xeon E5-4667 v3 offers 16 cores / 32 threads — the Xeon E5-4667 v3 has 12 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.7 GHz on the Core i3-14100F versus 2.9 GHz on the Xeon E5-4667 v3 — a 47.4% clock advantage for the Core i3-14100F (base: 3.5 GHz vs 2 GHz). The Core i3-14100F uses the Raptor Lake-R (2023−2025) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Xeon E5-4667 v3 uses Haswell-EP (2014−2015) (22 nm). In PassMark, the Core i3-14100F scores 15,381 against the Xeon E5-4667 v3's 15,397 — a 0.1% lead for the Xeon E5-4667 v3. L3 cache: 12 MB (total) on the Core i3-14100F vs 40 MB (total) on the Xeon E5-4667 v3.

Feature	Core i3-14100F	Xeon E5-4667 v3
Cores / Threads	4 / 8	16 / 32+300%
Boost Clock	4.7 GHz+62%	2.9 GHz
Base Clock	3.5 GHz+75%	2 GHz
L3 Cache	12 MB (total)	40 MB (total)+233%
L2 Cache	1.25 MB (per core)	256K (per core)+20380%
Process	Intel 7 nm-68%	22 nm
Architecture	Raptor Lake-R (2023−2025)	Haswell-EP (2014−2015)
PassMark	15,381	15,397

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i3-14100F uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Xeon E5-4667 v3 uses LGA2011 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Core i3-14100F	Xeon E5-4667 v3
Socket	LGA1700	LGA2011
PCIe Generation	PCIe 5.0+67%	PCIe 3.0

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Core i3-14100F was priced at $109, while the Xeon E5-4667 v3 came in at $128. On launch pricing ($109 vs $128), Core i3-14100F was $19 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i3-14100F delivers 141.1 pts/$ vs 120.3 pts/$ for the Xeon E5-4667 v3 — making the Core i3-14100F the 15.9% better value option.

Feature	Core i3-14100F	Xeon E5-4667 v3
MSRP	$109-15%	$128
Performance per Dollar	141.1+17%	120.3
Release Date	2024	2015

Search Core i3-14100F on Amazon

Search Xeon E5-4667 v3 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.