
Core i3-2310E vs Celeron G3900TE

Core i3-2310E

Celeron G3900TE
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Core i3-2310E is positioned at rank 1130 and the Celeron G3900TE is on rank 467, so the Celeron G3900TE offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Core i3-2310E
Performance Per Dollar Celeron G3900TE
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Core i3-2310E | Celeron G3900TE |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ❌ Lower gaming performance | ✅ Superior gaming performance |
| Workstation | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks | ✅ Better multi-core power |
| Price | ✅ More affordable ($20) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($45) |
| Longevity | 🛑 Legacy (Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) / 32 nm) | 🛑 Legacy (Skylake (2015−2016) / 14 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Core i3-2310E | Celeron G3900TE |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅ Better overall value (+124%) | ❌ Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅ More affordable ($20) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($45) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i3-2310E and Celeron G3900TE

Core i3-2310E
The Core i3-2310E is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 February 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.1 GHz, with boost up to 2.1 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1023. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,845 points. Launch price was $225.

Celeron G3900TE
The Celeron G3900TE is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 19 October 2015 (10 years ago). It is based on the Skylake (2015−2016) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 2.3 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1151. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3L-1600. Passmark benchmark score: 1,850 points. Launch price was $42.
Processing Power
The Core i3-2310E packs 2 cores / 4 threads, matching the Celeron G3900TE's 2 cores. Boost clocks reach 2.1 GHz on the Core i3-2310E versus 2.3 GHz on the Celeron G3900TE — a 9.1% clock advantage for the Celeron G3900TE. The Core i3-2310E uses the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture (32 nm), while the Celeron G3900TE uses Skylake (2015−2016) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core i3-2310E scores 1,845 against the Celeron G3900TE's 1,850 — a 0.3% lead for the Celeron G3900TE. L3 cache: 3 MB (total) on the Core i3-2310E vs 2 MB on the Celeron G3900TE.
| Feature | Core i3-2310E | Celeron G3900TE |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 2 / 4 | 2 / 2 |
| Boost Clock | 2.1 GHz | 2.3 GHz+10% |
| Base Clock | 2.1 GHz | — |
| L3 Cache | 3 MB (total)+50% | 2 MB |
| L2 Cache | 256K (per core) | 512 kB+100% |
| Process | 32 nm | 14 nm-56% |
| Architecture | Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) | Skylake (2015−2016) |
| PassMark | 1,845 | 1,850 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | — | 514 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | — | 903 |
Memory & Platform
The Core i3-2310E uses the BGA1023 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Celeron G3900TE uses LGA1151 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 1333 on the Core i3-2310E versus DDR4-2133 on the Celeron G3900TE — the Core i3-2310E supports 198.8% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Celeron G3900TE supports up to 64 GB of RAM compared to 16 — 120% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 16 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: HM65,HM67,QM67,QS67 (Core i3-2310E) and H110,Q170 (Celeron G3900TE).
| Feature | Core i3-2310E | Celeron G3900TE |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | BGA1023 | LGA1151 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 2.0 | PCIe 3.0+50% |
| Max RAM Speed | 1333+33225% | DDR4-2133 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 16 | 64 GB+419430300% |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | ❌ | ✅ |
| PCIe Lanes | 16 | 16 |
Advanced Features
Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: true (Core i3-2310E) vs VT-x, VT-d (Celeron G3900TE). Both include integrated graphics — Intel HD Graphics 3000 (Core i3-2310E) and Intel HD Graphics 510 (Celeron G3900TE) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron G3900TE targets Embedded. Direct competitor: Core i3-2310E rivals Core i3-2330M; Celeron G3900TE rivals Pentium G4400T.
| Feature | Core i3-2310E | Celeron G3900TE |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | Yes |
| IGPU Model | Intel HD Graphics 3000 | Intel HD Graphics 510 |
| Unlocked | No | No |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | true | VT-x, VT-d |
| Target Use | — | Embedded |
Value Analysis
The Core i3-2310E launched at $225 MSRP, while the Celeron G3900TE debuted at $42. At current prices ($20 vs $45), the Core i3-2310E is $25 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i3-2310E delivers 92.3 pts/$ vs 41.1 pts/$ for the Celeron G3900TE — making the Core i3-2310E the 76.7% better value option.
| Feature | Core i3-2310E | Celeron G3900TE |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $225 | $42-81% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $20-56% | $45 |
| Performance per Dollar | 92.3+125% | 41.1 |
| Release Date | 2011 | 2015 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.















