
Core i3-2310E

Core i7-740QM
Core i3-2310E vs Core i7-740QM Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Core i3-2310E vs Core i7-740QM FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Core i3-2310E vs Core i7-740QM: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Core i3-2310E
2011Why buy it
- ✅+0.2% higher PassMark.
- ✅Costs $153 less on MSRP ($225 MSRP vs $378 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 68.3% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 8.2 vs 4.9 PassMark/$ ($225 MSRP vs $378 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 35W instead of 45W, a 10W reduction.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel HD Graphics 3000, while Core i7-740QM needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-740QM across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (3 MB vs 6 MB).
Core i7-740QM
2010Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +3.0% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+100% larger total L3 cache (6 MB vs 3 MB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (1,842 vs 1,845).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 4.9 vs 8.2 PassMark/$ ($378 MSRP vs $225 MSRP).
- ❌28.6% higher power demand at 45W vs 35W.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Core i3-2310E can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Quick Answers
So, is Core i3-2310E better than Core i7-740QM?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core i3-2310E vs Core i7-740QM Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i3-2310E
The Core i3-2310E is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 February 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.1 GHz, with boost up to 2.1 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1023. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,845 points. Launch price was $225.

Core i7-740QM
The Core i7-740QM is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 20 June 2010 (15 years ago). It is based on the Clarksfield (2009−2010) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 1.73 GHz, with boost up to 2.93 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: PGA988. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-1066, DDR3-1333. Passmark benchmark score: 1,842 points. Launch price was $546.
Processing Power
The Core i3-2310E packs 2 cores / 4 threads, while the Core i7-740QM offers 4 cores / 8 threads — the Core i7-740QM has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 2.1 GHz on the Core i3-2310E versus 2.93 GHz on the Core i7-740QM — a 33% clock advantage for the Core i7-740QM (base: 2.1 GHz vs 1.73 GHz). The Core i3-2310E uses the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture (32 nm), while the Core i7-740QM uses Clarksfield (2009−2010) (45 nm). In PassMark, the Core i3-2310E scores 1,845 against the Core i7-740QM's 1,842 — a 0.2% lead for the Core i3-2310E. L3 cache: 3 MB (total) on the Core i3-2310E vs 6 MB (total) on the Core i7-740QM.
| Feature | Core i3-2310E | Core i7-740QM |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 2 / 4 | 4 / 8+100% |
| Boost Clock | 2.1 GHz | 2.93 GHz+40% |
| Base Clock | 2.1 GHz+21% | 1.73 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 3 MB (total) | 6 MB (total)+100% |
| L2 Cache | 256K (per core) | 256 kB (per core) |
| Process | 32 nm-29% | 45 nm |
| Architecture | Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) | Clarksfield (2009−2010) |
| PassMark | 1,845 | 1,842 |
Memory & Platform
The Core i3-2310E uses the BGA1023 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Core i7-740QM uses PGA988 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to 1333 memory speed. The Core i3-2310E supports up to 16 of RAM compared to 8 — 100% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 16 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: HM65,HM67,QM67,QS67 (Core i3-2310E) and PM55,HM55,QM57 (Core i7-740QM).
| Feature | Core i3-2310E | Core i7-740QM |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | BGA1023 | PGA988 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 2.0 | PCIe 2.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | 1333 | 1333 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 16+100% | 8 |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | No | No |
| PCIe Lanes | 16 | 16 |
Advanced Features
Neither processor supports overclocking. Both support true virtualization. The Core i3-2310E includes integrated graphics (Intel HD Graphics 3000), while the Core i7-740QM requires a dedicated GPU. Direct competitor: Core i3-2310E rivals Core i3-2330M; Core i7-740QM rivals Core 2 Quad Q9000.
| Feature | Core i3-2310E | Core i7-740QM |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | No |
| IGPU Model | Intel HD Graphics 3000 | None |
| Unlocked | No | No |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | true | true |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Core i3-2310E was priced at $225, while the Core i7-740QM came in at $378. On launch pricing ($225 vs $378), Core i3-2310E was $153 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i3-2310E delivers 8.2 pts/$ vs 4.9 pts/$ for the Core i7-740QM — making the Core i3-2310E the 50.9% better value option.
| Feature | Core i3-2310E | Core i7-740QM |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $225-40% | $378 |
| Performance per Dollar | 8.2+67% | 4.9 |
| Release Date | 2011 | 2010 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.














