Celeron G3900TE vs Core i3-2310E

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Celeron G3900TE vs Core i3-2310E FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Celeron G3900TE vs Core i3-2310E: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Celeron G3900TE

2015

Why buy it

✅Costs $183 less on MSRP ($42 MSRP vs $225 MSRP).
✅Delivers 437.2% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 44.0 vs 8.2 PassMark/$ ($42 MSRP vs $225 MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌Smaller total L3 cache (2 MB vs 3 MB).

Core i3-2310E

2011

Why buy it

✅+50% larger total L3 cache (3 MB vs 2 MB).

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (1,845 vs 1,850).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 8.2 vs 44.0 PassMark/$ ($225 MSRP vs $42 MSRP).

Quick Answers

So, is Celeron G3900TE better than Core i3-2310E?

Yes. Celeron G3900TE is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 0.4% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 0.3% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Celeron G3900TE is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 0.4% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Celeron G3900TE is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.3% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 2 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Celeron G3900TE is the better buy right now. Celeron G3900TE comes in $183 cheaper on MSRP at $42 MSRP versus $225 MSRP, and it still gives you a 0.4% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 437.2% better value on MSRP (44.0 vs 8.2 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Celeron G3900TE makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2015 vs 2011) and more multi-core headroom with 2 cores / 2 threads instead of 2/4. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Celeron G3900TE vs Core i3-2310E Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Celeron G3900TE

The Celeron G3900TE is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 19 October 2015 (10 years ago). It is based on the Skylake (2015−2016) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 2.3 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1151. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3L-1600. Passmark benchmark score: 1,850 points. Launch price was $42.

Core i3-2310E

The Core i3-2310E is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 February 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.1 GHz, with boost up to 2.1 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1023. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,845 points. Launch price was $225.

⚡

Processing Power

The Celeron G3900TE packs 2 cores / 2 threads, matching the Core i3-2310E's 2 cores. Boost clocks reach 2.3 GHz on the Celeron G3900TE versus 2.1 GHz on the Core i3-2310E — a 9.1% clock advantage for the Celeron G3900TE. The Celeron G3900TE uses the Skylake (2015−2016) architecture (14 nm), while the Core i3-2310E uses Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron G3900TE scores 1,850 against the Core i3-2310E's 1,845 — a 0.3% lead for the Celeron G3900TE. L3 cache: 2 MB on the Celeron G3900TE vs 3 MB (total) on the Core i3-2310E.

Feature	Celeron G3900TE	Core i3-2310E
Cores / Threads	2 / 2	2 / 4
Boost Clock	2.3 GHz+10%	2.1 GHz
Base Clock	—	2.1 GHz
L3 Cache	2 MB	3 MB (total)+50%
L2 Cache	512 kB+100%	256K (per core)
Process	14 nm-56%	32 nm
Architecture	Skylake (2015−2016)	Sandy Bridge (2011−2013)
PassMark	1,850	1,845
Geekbench 6 Single	514	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	903	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron G3900TE uses the LGA1151 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core i3-2310E uses BGA1023 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-2133 on the Celeron G3900TE versus 1333 on the Core i3-2310E — the Celeron G3900TE supports 60% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Celeron G3900TE supports up to 64 GB of RAM compared to 16 GB — 300% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 16 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: H110,Q170 (Celeron G3900TE) and HM65,HM67,QM67,QS67 (Core i3-2310E).

Feature	Celeron G3900TE	Core i3-2310E
Socket	LGA1151	BGA1023
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0+50%	PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR4-2133+60%	1333
Max RAM Capacity	64 GB+300%	16 GB
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	Yes	No
PCIe Lanes	16	16

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (Celeron G3900TE) vs true (Core i3-2310E). Both include integrated graphics — Intel HD Graphics 510 (Celeron G3900TE) and Intel HD Graphics 3000 (Core i3-2310E) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron G3900TE targets Embedded. Direct competitor: Celeron G3900TE rivals Pentium G4400T; Core i3-2310E rivals Core i3-2330M.

Feature	Celeron G3900TE	Core i3-2310E
Integrated GPU	Yes	Yes
IGPU Model	Intel HD Graphics 510	Intel HD Graphics 3000
Unlocked	No	No
AVX-512	No	No
Virtualization	VT-x, VT-d	true
Target Use	Embedded	—

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Celeron G3900TE was priced at $42, while the Core i3-2310E came in at $225. On launch pricing ($42 vs $225), Celeron G3900TE was $183 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Celeron G3900TE delivers 44.0 pts/$ vs 8.2 pts/$ for the Core i3-2310E — making the Celeron G3900TE the 137.2% better value option.

Feature	Celeron G3900TE	Core i3-2310E
MSRP	$42-81%	$225
Performance per Dollar	44.0+437%	8.2
Release Date	2015	2011

Search Celeron G3900TE on Amazon

Search Core i3-2310E on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.