A10 Pro-7350B vs Celeron G3900TE

A10 Pro-7350B vs Celeron G3900TE Performance Spectrum

A10 Pro-7350B

4 / 4

1,862

+0.6%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Celeron G3900TE

2 / 2

1,850

0.0%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

A10 Pro-7350B vs Celeron G3900TE FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

A10 Pro-7350B vs Celeron G3900TE: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

A10 Pro-7350B

2014

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +3.9% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Draws 4W instead of 35W, a 31W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.

Celeron G3900TE

2015

Why buy it

✅100% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 8) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than A10 Pro-7350B across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (1,850 vs 1,862).
❌Launch MSRP is still $42 MSRP, while A10 Pro-7350B mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌775% higher power demand at 35W vs 4W.

Quick Answers

So, is A10 Pro-7350B better than Celeron G3900TE?

Yes. A10 Pro-7350B is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 3.9% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data and 0.6% better PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, A10 Pro-7350B is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 3.9% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, A10 Pro-7350B is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.6% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

A10 Pro-7350B is still the much better call for a fresh build. A10 Pro-7350B comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $42 MSRP, and it still gives you a 3.9% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Celeron G3900TE only looks stronger on raw value math because it is extremely cheap, but that usually means used-market pricing on an obsolete 2015 platform. Even with 100.0% better value on paper (44.0 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), it really only makes sense as a cheap stopgap or a niche existing-platform option for someone already on LGA1151.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Celeron G3900TE makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2015 vs 2014). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

A10 Pro-7350B vs Celeron G3900TE Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

A10 Pro-7350B

The A10 Pro-7350B is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 4 June 2014 (11 years ago). It is based on the Kaveri (2014−2015) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.1 GHz, with boost up to 3.3 GHz. L2 cache: 4096 kB. Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: FP3. Thermal design power (TDP): 4 MB. Memory support: DDR3-1600. Passmark benchmark score: 1,862 points. Launch price was $69.

Celeron G3900TE

The Celeron G3900TE is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 19 October 2015 (10 years ago). It is based on the Skylake (2015−2016) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 2.3 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1151. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3L-1600. Passmark benchmark score: 1,850 points. Launch price was $42.

⚡

Processing Power

The A10 Pro-7350B packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Celeron G3900TE offers 2 cores / 2 threads — the A10 Pro-7350B has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.3 GHz on the A10 Pro-7350B versus 2.3 GHz on the Celeron G3900TE — a 35.7% clock advantage for the A10 Pro-7350B. The A10 Pro-7350B uses the Kaveri (2014−2015) architecture (28 nm), while the Celeron G3900TE uses Skylake (2015−2016) (14 nm). In PassMark, the A10 Pro-7350B scores 1,862 against the Celeron G3900TE's 1,850 — a 0.6% lead for the A10 Pro-7350B. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 286 vs 514, a 57% lead for the Celeron G3900TE that directly translates to higher frame rates.

Feature	A10 Pro-7350B	Celeron G3900TE
Cores / Threads	4 / 4+100%	2 / 2
Boost Clock	3.3 GHz+43%	2.3 GHz
Base Clock	2.1 GHz	—
L3 Cache	—	2 MB
L2 Cache	4096 kB+700%	512 kB
Process	28 nm	14 nm-50%
Architecture	Kaveri (2014−2015)	Skylake (2015−2016)
PassMark	1,862	1,850
Geekbench 6 Single	286	514+80%
Geekbench 6 Multi	—	903

🧠

Memory & Platform

The A10 Pro-7350B uses the FP3 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Celeron G3900TE uses LGA1151 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3-1600 on the A10 Pro-7350B versus DDR4-2133 on the Celeron G3900TE — the Celeron G3900TE supports 33.3% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Celeron G3900TE supports up to 64 GB of RAM compared to 16 GB — 300% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 8 (A10 Pro-7350B) vs 16 (Celeron G3900TE) — the Celeron G3900TE offers 8 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives.

Feature	A10 Pro-7350B	Celeron G3900TE
Socket	FP3	LGA1151
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR3-1600	DDR4-2133+33%
Max RAM Capacity	16 GB	64 GB+300%
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	No	Yes
PCIe Lanes	8	16+100%

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: AMD-V (A10 Pro-7350B) vs VT-x, VT-d (Celeron G3900TE). Both include integrated graphics — Radeon R6 (A10 Pro-7350B) and Intel HD Graphics 510 (Celeron G3900TE) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: A10 Pro-7350B targets Business Laptop, Celeron G3900TE targets Embedded. Direct competitor: A10 Pro-7350B rivals Core i5-4300U; Celeron G3900TE rivals Pentium G4400T.