A10 Pro-7350B vs Celeron G3900TE
A10 Pro-7350B
Celeron G3900TE
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The A10 Pro-7350B is positioned at rank 597 and the Celeron G3900TE is on rank 467, so the Celeron G3900TE offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar A10 Pro-7350B
Performance Per Dollar Celeron G3900TE
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | A10 Pro-7350B | Celeron G3900TE |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ❌ Lower gaming performance | ✅ Superior gaming performance |
| Workstation | ✅ Better multi-core power | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks |
| Price | ✅ More affordable ($0) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($45) |
| Longevity | 🛑 Legacy (Kaveri (2014−2015) / 28 nm) | 🛑 Legacy (Skylake (2015−2016) / 14 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | A10 Pro-7350B | Celeron G3900TE |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅ More affordable ($0) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($45) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of A10 Pro-7350B and Celeron G3900TE
A10 Pro-7350B
The A10 Pro-7350B is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 4 June 2014 (11 years ago). It is based on the Kaveri (2014−2015) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.1 GHz, with boost up to 3.3 GHz. L2 cache: 4096 kB. Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: FP3. Thermal design power (TDP): 4 MB. Memory support: DDR3-1600. Passmark benchmark score: 1,862 points. Launch price was $69.
Celeron G3900TE
The Celeron G3900TE is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 19 October 2015 (10 years ago). It is based on the Skylake (2015−2016) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 2.3 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1151. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3L-1600. Passmark benchmark score: 1,850 points. Launch price was $42.
Processing Power
The A10 Pro-7350B packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Celeron G3900TE offers 2 cores / 2 threads — the A10 Pro-7350B has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.3 GHz on the A10 Pro-7350B versus 2.3 GHz on the Celeron G3900TE — a 35.7% clock advantage for the A10 Pro-7350B. The A10 Pro-7350B uses the Kaveri (2014−2015) architecture (28 nm), while the Celeron G3900TE uses Skylake (2015−2016) (14 nm). In PassMark, the A10 Pro-7350B scores 1,862 against the Celeron G3900TE's 1,850 — a 0.6% lead for the A10 Pro-7350B. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 286 vs 514, a 57% lead for the Celeron G3900TE that directly translates to higher frame rates.
| Feature | A10 Pro-7350B | Celeron G3900TE |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 4 / 4+100% | 2 / 2 |
| Boost Clock | 3.3 GHz+43% | 2.3 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2.1 GHz | — |
| L3 Cache | — | 2 MB |
| L2 Cache | 4096 kB+700% | 512 kB |
| Process | 28 nm | 14 nm-50% |
| Architecture | Kaveri (2014−2015) | Skylake (2015−2016) |
| PassMark | 1,862 | 1,850 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 286 | 514+80% |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | — | 903 |
Memory & Platform
The A10 Pro-7350B uses the FP3 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Celeron G3900TE uses LGA1151 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3-1600 on the A10 Pro-7350B versus DDR4-2133 on the Celeron G3900TE — the Celeron G3900TE supports 28.6% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Celeron G3900TE supports up to 64 GB of RAM compared to 16 GB — 120% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 8 (A10 Pro-7350B) vs 16 (Celeron G3900TE) — the Celeron G3900TE offers 8 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives.
| Feature | A10 Pro-7350B | Celeron G3900TE |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FP3 | LGA1151 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR3-1600 | DDR4-2133+33% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 16 GB | 64 GB+300% |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | ❌ | ✅ |
| PCIe Lanes | 8 | 16+100% |
Advanced Features
Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: AMD-V (A10 Pro-7350B) vs VT-x, VT-d (Celeron G3900TE). Both include integrated graphics — Radeon R6 (A10 Pro-7350B) and Intel HD Graphics 510 (Celeron G3900TE) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: A10 Pro-7350B targets Business Laptop, Celeron G3900TE targets Embedded. Direct competitor: A10 Pro-7350B rivals Core i5-4300U; Celeron G3900TE rivals Pentium G4400T.
| Feature | A10 Pro-7350B | Celeron G3900TE |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | Yes |
| IGPU Model | Radeon R6 | Intel HD Graphics 510 |
| Unlocked | No | No |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | AMD-V | VT-x, VT-d |
| Target Use | Business Laptop | Embedded |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on A10 Pro-7350B and Celeron G3900TE
