A10 Pro-7350B vs Core i7-2677M

A10 Pro-7350B vs Core i7-2677M Performance Spectrum

A10 Pro-7350B

4 / 4

1,862

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Core i7-2677M

2 / 4

1,875

+0.7%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

A10 Pro-7350B vs Core i7-2677M FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

A10 Pro-7350B vs Core i7-2677M: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

A10 Pro-7350B

2014

Why buy it

✅Draws 4W instead of 17W, a 13W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower Geekbench single-core performance for gaming (286 vs 562).
❌Lower PassMark (1,862 vs 1,875).

Core i7-2677M

2011

Why buy it

✅+96.5% higher Geekbench single-core performance for gaming and desktop responsiveness.
✅100% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 8) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌325% higher power demand at 17W vs 4W.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i7-2677M better than A10 Pro-7350B?

Yes. Core i7-2677M is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 2.3% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data and 0.7% better PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Core i7-2677M is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 2.3% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i7-2677M is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.7% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i7-2677M still makes the most sense overall. Core i7-2677M comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 2.3% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

A10 Pro-7350B makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2014 vs 2011). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

A10 Pro-7350B vs Core i7-2677M Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

A10 Pro-7350B

The A10 Pro-7350B is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 4 June 2014 (11 years ago). It is based on the Kaveri (2014−2015) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.1 GHz, with boost up to 3.3 GHz. L2 cache: 4096 kB. Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: FP3. Thermal design power (TDP): 4 MB. Memory support: DDR3-1600. Passmark benchmark score: 1,862 points. Launch price was $69.

Core i7-2677M

The Core i7-2677M is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 27 June 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.8 GHz, with boost up to 2.9 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1023. Thermal design power (TDP): 17 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-1066, DDR3-1333. Passmark benchmark score: 1,875 points. Launch price was $317.

⚡

Processing Power

The A10 Pro-7350B packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Core i7-2677M offers 2 cores / 4 threads — the A10 Pro-7350B has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.3 GHz on the A10 Pro-7350B versus 2.9 GHz on the Core i7-2677M — a 12.9% clock advantage for the A10 Pro-7350B (base: 2.1 GHz vs 1.8 GHz). The A10 Pro-7350B uses the Kaveri (2014−2015) architecture (28 nm), while the Core i7-2677M uses Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) (32 nm). In PassMark, the A10 Pro-7350B scores 1,862 against the Core i7-2677M's 1,875 — a 0.7% lead for the Core i7-2677M. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 286 vs 562, a 65.1% lead for the Core i7-2677M that directly translates to higher frame rates.

Feature	A10 Pro-7350B	Core i7-2677M
Cores / Threads	4 / 4+100%	2 / 4
Boost Clock	3.3 GHz+14%	2.9 GHz
Base Clock	2.1 GHz+17%	1.8 GHz
L3 Cache	—	4 MB
L2 Cache	4096 kB+700%	512 kB
Process	28 nm-13%	32 nm
Architecture	Kaveri (2014−2015)	Sandy Bridge (2011−2013)
PassMark	1,862	1,875
Geekbench 6 Single	286	562+97%

🧠

Memory & Platform

The A10 Pro-7350B uses the FP3 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core i7-2677M uses BGA1023 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3-1600 on the A10 Pro-7350B versus DDR3-1333 on the Core i7-2677M — the A10 Pro-7350B supports 20% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The A10 Pro-7350B supports up to 16 GB of RAM compared to 8 GB — 100% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 8 (A10 Pro-7350B) vs 16 (Core i7-2677M) — the Core i7-2677M offers 8 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives.

Feature	A10 Pro-7350B	Core i7-2677M
Socket	FP3	BGA1023
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0+50%	PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR3-1600+20%	DDR3-1333
Max RAM Capacity	16 GB+100%	8 GB
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	No	No
PCIe Lanes	8	16+100%

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: AMD-V (A10 Pro-7350B) vs VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i7-2677M). Both include integrated graphics — Radeon R6 (A10 Pro-7350B) and HD Graphics 3000 (Core i7-2677M) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: A10 Pro-7350B targets Business Laptop, Core i7-2677M targets Ultrabook. Direct competitor: A10 Pro-7350B rivals Core i5-4300U; Core i7-2677M rivals A6-3420M.