A10 Pro-7350B vs Core i3-4030U

A10 Pro-7350B vs Core i3-4030U Performance Spectrum

A10 Pro-7350B

4 / 4

1,862

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Core i3-4030U

2 / 4

1,876

+0.8%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

A10 Pro-7350B vs Core i3-4030U FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

A10 Pro-7350B vs Core i3-4030U: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

A10 Pro-7350B

2014

Why buy it

✅Draws 4W instead of 512W, a 508W reduction.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (8 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon R6, while Core i3-4030U needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (1,862 vs 1,876).

Core i3-4030U

2014

Why buy it

✅+0.8% higher PassMark.

Trade-offs

❌Launch MSRP is still $281 MSRP, while A10 Pro-7350B mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌12700% higher power demand at 512W vs 4W.
❌No integrated graphics, while A10 Pro-7350B can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i3-4030U better than A10 Pro-7350B?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, A10 Pro-7350B is ahead with a 2.3% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Core i3-4030U pulls ahead with 0.8% better PassMark.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i3-4030U is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.8% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i3-4030U is the better buy right now. Core i3-4030U comes in at an unclear MSRP at $281 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you 0.8% better PassMark. The compromise is that A10 Pro-7350B is still the better pure gaming CPU with a 2.3% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (6.7 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i3-4030U is the safer long-term CPU choice because it gives you more room to grow and a better platform outlook.

A10 Pro-7350B vs Core i3-4030U Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

A10 Pro-7350B

The A10 Pro-7350B is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 4 June 2014 (11 years ago). It is based on the Kaveri (2014−2015) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.1 GHz, with boost up to 3.3 GHz. L2 cache: 4096 kB. Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: FP3. Thermal design power (TDP): 4 MB. Memory support: DDR3-1600. Passmark benchmark score: 1,862 points. Launch price was $69.

Core i3-4030U

The Core i3-4030U is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 14 April 2014 (11 years ago). It is based on the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.9 GHz, with boost up to 1.9 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1168. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,876 points. Launch price was $281.

⚡

Processing Power

The A10 Pro-7350B packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Core i3-4030U offers 2 cores / 4 threads — the A10 Pro-7350B has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.3 GHz on the A10 Pro-7350B versus 1.9 GHz on the Core i3-4030U — a 53.8% clock advantage for the A10 Pro-7350B (base: 2.1 GHz vs 1.9 GHz). The A10 Pro-7350B uses the Kaveri (2014−2015) architecture (28 nm), while the Core i3-4030U uses Haswell (2013−2015) (22 nm). In PassMark, the A10 Pro-7350B scores 1,862 against the Core i3-4030U's 1,876 — a 0.7% lead for the Core i3-4030U.

Feature	A10 Pro-7350B	Core i3-4030U
Cores / Threads	4 / 4+100%	2 / 4
Boost Clock	3.3 GHz+74%	1.9 GHz
Base Clock	2.1 GHz+11%	1.9 GHz
L3 Cache	—	3 MB
L2 Cache	4096 kB+700%	512 kB
Process	28 nm	22 nm-21%
Architecture	Kaveri (2014−2015)	Haswell (2013−2015)
PassMark	1,862	1,876
Geekbench 6 Single	286	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The A10 Pro-7350B uses the FP3 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core i3-4030U uses FCBGA1168 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	A10 Pro-7350B	Core i3-4030U
Socket	FP3	FCBGA1168
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR3-1600	—
Max RAM Capacity	16 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	No	—
PCIe Lanes	8	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: AMD-V (A10 Pro-7350B) / not specified (Core i3-4030U). The A10 Pro-7350B includes integrated graphics (Radeon R6), while the Core i3-4030U requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: A10 Pro-7350B targets Business Laptop. Direct competitor: A10 Pro-7350B rivals Core i5-4300U.