A10 Pro-7350B vs Atom x7-E3950
A10 Pro-7350B
Atom x7-E3950
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The A10 Pro-7350B is positioned at rank 597 and the Atom x7-E3950 is on rank 480, so the Atom x7-E3950 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar A10 Pro-7350B
Performance Per Dollar Atom x7-E3950
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | A10 Pro-7350B | Atom x7-E3950 |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ✅ Superior gaming performance | ❌ Lower gaming performance |
| Workstation | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks | ✅ Better multi-core power |
| Price | Equivalent pricing | Equivalent pricing |
| Longevity | 🛑 Legacy (Kaveri (2014−2015) / 28 nm) | 🛑 Legacy (Apollo Lake (2014−2016) / 14 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | A10 Pro-7350B | Atom x7-E3950 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | Equivalent pricing | Equivalent pricing |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of A10 Pro-7350B and Atom x7-E3950
A10 Pro-7350B
The A10 Pro-7350B is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 4 June 2014 (11 years ago). It is based on the Kaveri (2014−2015) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.1 GHz, with boost up to 3.3 GHz. L2 cache: 4096 kB. Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: FP3. Thermal design power (TDP): 4 MB. Memory support: DDR3-1600. Passmark benchmark score: 1,862 points. Launch price was $69.
Atom x7-E3950
The Atom x7-E3950 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 30 August 2014 (11 years ago). It is based on the Apollo Lake (2014−2016) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.6 GHz, with boost up to 2 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 2 MB (total). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1296. Thermal design power (TDP): 12 Watt. Memory support: DDR3, DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 1,864 points. Launch price was $57.
Processing Power
Both the A10 Pro-7350B and Atom x7-E3950 share an identical 4-core/4-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 3.3 GHz on the A10 Pro-7350B versus 2 GHz on the Atom x7-E3950 — a 49.1% clock advantage for the A10 Pro-7350B (base: 2.1 GHz vs 1.6 GHz). The A10 Pro-7350B uses the Kaveri (2014−2015) architecture (28 nm), while the Atom x7-E3950 uses Apollo Lake (2014−2016) (14 nm). In PassMark, the A10 Pro-7350B scores 1,862 against the Atom x7-E3950's 1,864 — a 0.1% lead for the Atom x7-E3950. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 286 vs 245, a 15.4% lead for the A10 Pro-7350B that directly translates to higher frame rates.
| Feature | A10 Pro-7350B | Atom x7-E3950 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 4 / 4 | 4 / 4 |
| Boost Clock | 3.3 GHz+65% | 2 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2.1 GHz+31% | 1.6 GHz |
| L3 Cache | — | 0 kB |
| L2 Cache | 4096 kB+100% | 2 MB (total) |
| Process | 28 nm | 14 nm-50% |
| Architecture | Kaveri (2014−2015) | Apollo Lake (2014−2016) |
| PassMark | 1,862 | 1,864 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 286+17% | 245 |
Memory & Platform
The A10 Pro-7350B uses the FP3 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Atom x7-E3950 uses FCBGA1296 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3-1600 on the A10 Pro-7350B versus LPDDR4-2400 on the Atom x7-E3950 — the Atom x7-E3950 supports 28.6% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The A10 Pro-7350B supports up to 16 GB of RAM compared to 8 GB — 66.7% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (A10 Pro-7350B) vs 4 (Atom x7-E3950). PCIe lanes: 8 (A10 Pro-7350B) vs 6 (Atom x7-E3950) — the A10 Pro-7350B offers 2 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives.
| Feature | A10 Pro-7350B | Atom x7-E3950 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FP3 | FCBGA1296 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR3-1600 | LPDDR4-2400+33% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 16 GB+100% | 8 GB |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 4+100% |
| ECC Support | ❌ | ✅ |
| PCIe Lanes | 8+33% | 6 |
Advanced Features
Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: AMD-V (A10 Pro-7350B) vs VT-x, VT-d (Atom x7-E3950). Both include integrated graphics — Radeon R6 (A10 Pro-7350B) and HD Graphics 505 (Atom x7-E3950) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: A10 Pro-7350B targets Business Laptop. Direct competitor: A10 Pro-7350B rivals Core i5-4300U.
| Feature | A10 Pro-7350B | Atom x7-E3950 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | Yes |
| IGPU Model | Radeon R6 | HD Graphics 505 |
| Unlocked | No | No |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | AMD-V | VT-x, VT-d |
| Target Use | Business Laptop | — |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on A10 Pro-7350B and Atom x7-E3950
