
A10 Pro-7350B

Athlon II X3 450
A10 Pro-7350B vs Athlon II X3 450 Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
A10 Pro-7350B vs Athlon II X3 450 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
A10 Pro-7350B vs Athlon II X3 450: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
A10 Pro-7350B
2014Why buy it
- ✅Draws 4W instead of 95W, a 91W reduction.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon R6, while Athlon II X3 450 needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower Geekbench single-core performance for gaming (286 vs 380).
- ❌Lower PassMark (1,862 vs 1,865).
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Athlon II X3 450.
Athlon II X3 450
2010Why buy it
- ✅+32.9% higher Geekbench single-core performance for gaming and desktop responsiveness.
- ✅100% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 8) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (AMD Stock), unlike A10 Pro-7350B.
Trade-offs
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $87 MSRP, while A10 Pro-7350B mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌2275% higher power demand at 95W vs 4W.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while A10 Pro-7350B can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Quick Answers
So, is Athlon II X3 450 better than A10 Pro-7350B?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
A10 Pro-7350B vs Athlon II X3 450 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

A10 Pro-7350B
The A10 Pro-7350B is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 4 June 2014 (11 years ago). It is based on the Kaveri (2014−2015) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.1 GHz, with boost up to 3.3 GHz. L2 cache: 4096 kB. Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: FP3. Thermal design power (TDP): 4 MB. Memory support: DDR3-1600. Passmark benchmark score: 1,862 points. Launch price was $69.

Athlon II X3 450
The Athlon II X3 450 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 21 September 2010 (15 years ago). It is based on the Rana (2009−2011) architecture. It features 3 cores and 3 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 3.2 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: AM3. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,865 points. Launch price was $45.
Processing Power
The A10 Pro-7350B packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Athlon II X3 450 offers 3 cores / 3 threads — the A10 Pro-7350B has 1 more core. Boost clocks reach 3.3 GHz on the A10 Pro-7350B versus 3.2 GHz on the Athlon II X3 450 — a 3.1% clock advantage for the A10 Pro-7350B (base: 2.1 GHz vs 3.2 GHz). The A10 Pro-7350B uses the Kaveri (2014−2015) architecture (28 nm), while the Athlon II X3 450 uses Rana (2009−2011) (45 nm). In PassMark, the A10 Pro-7350B scores 1,862 against the Athlon II X3 450's 1,865 — a 0.2% lead for the Athlon II X3 450. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 286 vs 380, a 28.2% lead for the Athlon II X3 450 that directly translates to higher frame rates.
| Feature | A10 Pro-7350B | Athlon II X3 450 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 4 / 4+33% | 3 / 3 |
| Boost Clock | 3.3 GHz+3% | 3.2 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2.1 GHz | 3.2 GHz+52% |
| L3 Cache | — | 0 kB |
| L2 Cache | 4096 kB+700% | 512 kB (per core) |
| Process | 28 nm-38% | 45 nm |
| Architecture | Kaveri (2014−2015) | Rana (2009−2011) |
| PassMark | 1,862 | 1,865 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 286 | 380+33% |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | — | 980 |
Memory & Platform
The A10 Pro-7350B uses the FP3 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Athlon II X3 450 uses AM3 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3-1600 on the A10 Pro-7350B versus DDR3-1333 on the Athlon II X3 450 — the A10 Pro-7350B supports 20% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Athlon II X3 450 supports up to 32 GB of RAM compared to 16 GB — 100% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 8 (A10 Pro-7350B) vs 16 (Athlon II X3 450) — the Athlon II X3 450 offers 8 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives.
| Feature | A10 Pro-7350B | Athlon II X3 450 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FP3 | AM3 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0+50% | PCIe 2.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR3-1600+20% | DDR3-1333 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 16 GB | 32 GB+100% |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | No | No |
| PCIe Lanes | 8 | 16+100% |
Advanced Features
Neither processor supports overclocking. Both support AMD-V virtualization. The A10 Pro-7350B includes integrated graphics (Radeon R6), while the Athlon II X3 450 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: A10 Pro-7350B targets Business Laptop, Athlon II X3 450 targets Desktop. Direct competitor: A10 Pro-7350B rivals Core i5-4300U.
| Feature | A10 Pro-7350B | Athlon II X3 450 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | No |
| IGPU Model | Radeon R6 | — |
| Unlocked | No | No |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | AMD-V | AMD-V |
| Target Use | Business Laptop | Desktop |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.















