
Celeron G3900TE vs Phenom X4 9600B

Celeron G3900TE

Phenom X4 9600B
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Celeron G3900TE is positioned at rank 467 and the Phenom X4 9600B is on rank 1055, so the Celeron G3900TE offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Celeron G3900TE
Performance Per Dollar Phenom X4 9600B
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Celeron G3900TE | Phenom X4 9600B |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | Balanced gaming performance | Balanced gaming performance |
| Workstation | ✅ Better multi-core power | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks |
| Price | ⚠️ Higher cost ($45) | ✅ More affordable ($20) |
| Longevity | 🛑 Legacy (Skylake (2015−2016) / 14 nm) | 🛑 Legacy (Agena (2007−2008) / 65 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Celeron G3900TE | Phenom X4 9600B |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency | ✅ Better overall value (+124%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️ Higher cost ($45) | ✅ More affordable ($20) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Celeron G3900TE and Phenom X4 9600B

Celeron G3900TE
The Celeron G3900TE is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 19 October 2015 (10 years ago). It is based on the Skylake (2015−2016) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 2.3 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1151. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3L-1600. Passmark benchmark score: 1,850 points. Launch price was $42.

Phenom X4 9600B
The Phenom X4 9600B is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2009-01-01. It is based on the Agena (2007−2008) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Max frequency: 2.3 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: AM2+. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 1,842 points. Launch price was $149.
Processing Power
The Celeron G3900TE packs 2 cores / 2 threads, while the Phenom X4 9600B offers 4 cores / 4 threads — the Phenom X4 9600B has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 2.3 GHz on the Celeron G3900TE versus 2.3 GHz on the Phenom X4 9600B — identical boost frequencies. The Celeron G3900TE uses the Skylake (2015−2016) architecture (14 nm), while the Phenom X4 9600B uses Agena (2007−2008) (65 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron G3900TE scores 1,850 against the Phenom X4 9600B's 1,842 — a 0.4% lead for the Celeron G3900TE. L3 cache: 2 MB on the Celeron G3900TE vs 2 MB (total) on the Phenom X4 9600B.
| Feature | Celeron G3900TE | Phenom X4 9600B |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 2 / 2 | 4 / 4+100% |
| Boost Clock | 2.3 GHz | 2.3 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 2 MB | 2 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 512 kB | 512 kB (per core) |
| Process | 14 nm-78% | 65 nm |
| Architecture | Skylake (2015−2016) | Agena (2007−2008) |
| PassMark | 1,850 | 1,842 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 514 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 903 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Celeron G3900TE uses the LGA1151 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Phenom X4 9600B uses AM2+ (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-2133 on the Celeron G3900TE versus DDR2-1066 on the Phenom X4 9600B — the Celeron G3900TE supports 66.7% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Celeron G3900TE supports up to 64 GB of RAM compared to 16 GB — 120% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 16 (Celeron G3900TE) vs 0 (Phenom X4 9600B) — the Celeron G3900TE offers 16 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives.
| Feature | Celeron G3900TE | Phenom X4 9600B |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1151 | AM2+ |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0+50% | PCIe 2.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-2133+100% | DDR2-1066 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 64 GB+300% | 16 GB |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | ✅ | ❌ |
| PCIe Lanes | 16 | 0 |
Advanced Features
Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (Celeron G3900TE) vs AMD-V (Phenom X4 9600B). The Celeron G3900TE includes integrated graphics (Intel HD Graphics 510), while the Phenom X4 9600B requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron G3900TE targets Embedded, Phenom X4 9600B targets Business. Direct competitor: Celeron G3900TE rivals Pentium G4400T.
| Feature | Celeron G3900TE | Phenom X4 9600B |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | No |
| IGPU Model | Intel HD Graphics 510 | — |
| Unlocked | No | No |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | AMD-V |
| Target Use | Embedded | Business |
Value Analysis
The Celeron G3900TE launched at $42 MSRP, while the Phenom X4 9600B debuted at $278. At current prices ($45 vs $20), the Phenom X4 9600B is $25 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Celeron G3900TE delivers 41.1 pts/$ vs 92.1 pts/$ for the Phenom X4 9600B — making the Phenom X4 9600B the 76.6% better value option.
| Feature | Celeron G3900TE | Phenom X4 9600B |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $42-85% | $278 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $45 | $20-56% |
| Performance per Dollar | 41.1 | 92.1+124% |
| Release Date | 2015 | 2008 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












