Core i3-2310M
VS
Celeron G470

Core i3-2310M vs Celeron G470

Intel

Core i3-2310M

2 Cores4 Thrd512 WWMax: 2.1 GHz2011
VS
Intel

Celeron G470

1 Cores2 Thrd35 WW2013

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Core i3-2310M is positioned at rank 1032 and the Celeron G470 is on rank 542, so the Celeron G470 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Core i3-2310M

#1019
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
2401%
#1020
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
2366%
#1021
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
2172%
#1022
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
2162%
#1023
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
2142%
#1025
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
2069%
#1026
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
1984%
#1027
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
1980%
#1028
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
1927%
#1031
Core i5-4400E
MSRP: $266|Avg: $50
100%
#1032
Core i3-2310M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#1033
Pentium Dual Core T4400
MSRP: $107|Avg: $5
98%
#1036
Core i7-8665UE
MSRP: $409|Avg: $409
97%
#1037
Celeron T3300
MSRP: $86|Avg: $15
96%
#1038
Celeron Dual-Core T3300
MSRP: $86|Avg: $30
96%
#1041
Core i7-3612QE
MSRP: $426|Avg: $50
95%
#1042
A10-7300
MSRP: $150|Avg: $50
95%
#1043
Pentium Dual Core T4200
MSRP: $100|Avg: $10
94%
#1044
A6 Micro-6500T
MSRP: $100|Avg: $15
94%
#1045
Pentium N3520
MSRP: $100|Avg: $10
94%
#1046
E2-3800
MSRP: $100|Avg: $20
93%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Celeron G470

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
8906%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
8415%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
6110%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
1841%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
1458%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
1276%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
731%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
721%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
657%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
656%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
649%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
632%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
623%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
620%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
615%
#377
Core i3-9100HL
MSRP: $225|Avg: $100
99%
#378
Core i9-12900TE
MSRP: $494|Avg: $664
98%
#542
Celeron G470
MSRP: $35|Avg: $10
100%
#543
Pentium G3220
MSRP: $54|Avg: $15
100%
#545
Athlon 5370
MSRP: $55|Avg: $15
99%
#548
Core i3-6100
MSRP: $125|Avg: $30
98%
#549
Core i3-6300T
MSRP: $117|Avg: $15
97%
#550
Core i3-6098P
MSRP: $117|Avg: $59
97%
#551
Core i7-7800X
MSRP: $383|Avg: $254
97%
#552
Core i3-7101TE
MSRP: $117|Avg: $60
97%
#555
FX-8320E
MSRP: $147|Avg: $60
96%
#556
Pentium G3260
MSRP: $64|Avg: $21
94%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Trade-off: The Core i3-2310M leads in gaming performance. However, the Celeron G470 is the stronger candidate for professional workloads, offering 0.2% greater multi-core processing power.
InsightCore i3-2310MCeleron G470
Gaming
Superior gaming performance
Lower gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($10)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) / 32 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Legacy / 32 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

InsightCore i3-2310MCeleron G470
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($10)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core i3-2310M and Celeron G470

Intel

Core i3-2310M

The Core i3-2310M is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 February 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.1 GHz, with boost up to 2.1 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: PGA988. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,222 points. Launch price was $225.

Intel

Celeron G470

The Celeron G470 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It features 1 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency: 2 GHz. L3 cache: 1.5 MB Intel® Smart Cache. Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1155. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-1066, DDR3-1333. Passmark benchmark score: 1,225 points. Launch price was $69.

Processing Power

The Core i3-2310M packs 2 cores / 4 threads, while the Celeron G470 offers 1 cores / 2 threads — the Core i3-2310M has 1 more core. The Core i3-2310M is built on the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture. In PassMark, the Core i3-2310M scores 1,222 against the Celeron G470's 1,225 — a 0.2% lead for the Celeron G470. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 350 vs 300, a 15.4% lead for the Core i3-2310M that directly translates to higher frame rates. L3 cache: 3 MB (total) on the Core i3-2310M vs 1.5 MB Intel® Smart Cache on the Celeron G470.

FeatureCore i3-2310MCeleron G470
Cores / Threads
2 / 4+100%
1 / 2
Boost Clock
2.1 GHz
Base Clock
2.1 GHz+5%
2 GHz
L3 Cache
3 MB (total)+100%
1.5 MB Intel® Smart Cache
L2 Cache
256K (per core)
Process
32 nm
32 nm
Architecture
Sandy Bridge (2011−2013)
PassMark
1,222
1,225
Geekbench 6 Single
350+17%
300
Geekbench 6 Multi
658
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i3-2310M uses the PGA988 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Celeron G470 uses LGA1155 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR3-1333 memory speed. The Celeron G470 supports up to 32 GB of RAM compared to 16 GB 66.7% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 16 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: Sandy Bridge (Core i3-2310M) and H61,B65,H67,Z68 (Celeron G470).

FeatureCore i3-2310MCeleron G470
Socket
PGA988
LGA1155
PCIe Generation
PCIe 2.0
PCIe 3.0+50%
Max RAM Speed
DDR3-1333
DDR3-1066
Max RAM Capacity
16 GB
32 GB+100%
RAM Channels
2
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
16
16
🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Both support VT-x virtualization. Both include integrated graphics HD Graphics 3000 (Core i3-2310M) and HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge) (Celeron G470) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i3-2310M targets Budget, Celeron G470 targets Budget. Direct competitor: Core i3-2310M rivals Athlon Silver 3050U; Celeron G470 rivals Pentium G630.

FeatureCore i3-2310MCeleron G470
Integrated GPU
Yes
Yes
IGPU Model
HD Graphics 3000
HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge)
Unlocked
No
No
AVX-512
No
No
Virtualization
VT-x
VT-x
Target Use
Budget
Budget