Core i3-2310M vs Core i3-2328M

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i3-2310M vs Core i3-2328M FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i3-2310M vs Core i3-2328M: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i3-2310M

2011

Why buy it

✅+6.4% higher Geekbench single-core performance for gaming and desktop responsiveness.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (1,222 vs 1,234).

Core i3-2328M

2012

Why buy it

✅+1% higher PassMark.

Trade-offs

❌Lower Geekbench single-core performance for gaming (329 vs 350).

Quick Answers

So, is Core i3-2328M better than Core i3-2310M?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Core i3-2310M is ahead with 6.4% stronger Geekbench single-core performance. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Core i3-2328M pulls ahead with 1% better PassMark.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i3-2328M is the stronger fit. You are getting 1% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i3-2328M still makes the most sense overall. Core i3-2328M comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you 1% better PassMark.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i3-2328M makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2012 vs 2011) and more multi-core headroom with 2 cores / 4 threads instead of 2/4. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Core i3-2310M vs Core i3-2328M Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i3-2310M

The Core i3-2310M is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 February 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.1 GHz, with boost up to 2.1 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: PGA988. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,222 points. Launch price was $225.

Core i3-2328M

The Core i3-2328M is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 September 2012 (13 years ago). It is based on the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 2.2 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: PGA988. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,234 points. Launch price was $225.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Core i3-2310M and Core i3-2328M share an identical 2-core/4-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 2.1 GHz on the Core i3-2310M versus 2.2 GHz on the Core i3-2328M — a 4.7% clock advantage for the Core i3-2328M (base: 2.1 GHz vs 2.2 GHz). Both are built on the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture using a 32 nm process. In PassMark, the Core i3-2310M scores 1,222 against the Core i3-2328M's 1,234 — a 1% lead for the Core i3-2328M. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 350 vs 329, a 6.2% lead for the Core i3-2310M that directly translates to higher frame rates. Both processors carry 3 MB (total) of L3 cache.

Feature	Core i3-2310M	Core i3-2328M
Cores / Threads	2 / 4	2 / 4
Boost Clock	2.1 GHz	2.2 GHz+5%
Base Clock	2.1 GHz	2.2 GHz+5%
L3 Cache	3 MB (total)	3 MB (total)
L2 Cache	256K (per core)	256K (per core)
Process	32 nm	32 nm
Architecture	Sandy Bridge (2011−2013)	Sandy Bridge (2011−2013)
PassMark	1,222	1,234
Geekbench 6 Single	350+6%	329
Geekbench 6 Multi	658	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

Both processors use the PGA988 socket with PCIe 2.0. Both support up to DDR3-1333 memory speed. Both support up to 16 GB of RAM. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 16 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: Sandy Bridge (Core i3-2310M) and HM65,HM67,QM67,HM75,HM76,HM77 (Core i3-2328M).

Feature	Core i3-2310M	Core i3-2328M
Socket	PGA988	PGA988
PCIe Generation	PCIe 2.0	PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR3-1333	DDR3-1333
Max RAM Capacity	16 GB	16 GB
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	No	No
PCIe Lanes	16	16

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: VT-x (Core i3-2310M) vs VT-x, EPT (Core i3-2328M). Both include integrated graphics — HD Graphics 3000 (Core i3-2310M) and HD Graphics 3000 (Core i3-2328M) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i3-2310M targets Budget, Core i3-2328M targets Budget Laptop. Direct competitor: Core i3-2310M rivals Athlon Silver 3050U; Core i3-2328M rivals Pentium B980.