Celeron G470 vs Core i3-2310M

CPU

GPU

Celeron G470

1 Cores2 Thrd35 WW2013

Buy on Amazon

Core i3-2310M

2 Cores4 Thrd512 WWMax: 2.1 GHz2011

Buy on Amazon

Celeron G470 vs Core i3-2310M Performance Spectrum

Celeron G470

1 / 2

1,225

+0.2%

1,222

0.0%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Celeron G470 vs Core i3-2310M FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Celeron G470 vs Core i3-2310M: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Celeron G470

2013

Why buy it

✅+0.2% higher PassMark.
✅Draws 35W instead of 512W, a 477W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower Geekbench single-core performance for gaming (300 vs 350).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (1.5 MB vs 3 MB).
❌Launch MSRP is still $35 MSRP, while Core i3-2310M mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.

Core i3-2310M

2011

Why buy it

✅+16.7% higher Geekbench single-core performance for gaming and desktop responsiveness.
✅+100% larger total L3 cache (3 MB vs 1.5 MB).

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (1,222 vs 1,225).
❌1362.9% higher power demand at 512W vs 35W.

Quick Answers

So, is Celeron G470 better than Core i3-2310M?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Core i3-2310M is ahead with a 0.5% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Celeron G470 pulls ahead with 0.2% better PassMark. Core i3-2310M also has the bigger cache pool with 100% larger total L3 cache (3 MB vs 1.5 MB).

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Celeron G470 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.2% better PassMark, backed by 1 cores and 2 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Celeron G470 is the better buy right now. Celeron G470 comes in at an unclear MSRP at $35 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you 0.2% better PassMark. The compromise is that Core i3-2310M is still the better pure gaming CPU with a 0.5% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (35.0 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Celeron G470 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2013 vs 2011) and more multi-core headroom with 1 cores / 2 threads instead of 2/4. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Celeron G470 vs Core i3-2310M Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Celeron G470

The Celeron G470 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It features 1 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency: 2 GHz. L3 cache: 1.5 MB Intel® Smart Cache. Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1155. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-1066, DDR3-1333. Passmark benchmark score: 1,225 points. Launch price was $69.

Core i3-2310M

The Core i3-2310M is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 February 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.1 GHz, with boost up to 2.1 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: PGA988. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,222 points. Launch price was $225.

⚡

Processing Power

The Celeron G470 packs 1 cores / 2 threads, while the Core i3-2310M offers 2 cores / 4 threads — the Core i3-2310M has 1 more core. The Core i3-2310M is built on the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture. In PassMark, the Celeron G470 scores 1,225 against the Core i3-2310M's 1,222 — a 0.2% lead for the Celeron G470. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 300 vs 350, a 15.4% lead for the Core i3-2310M that directly translates to higher frame rates. L3 cache: 1.5 MB Intel® Smart Cache on the Celeron G470 vs 3 MB (total) on the Core i3-2310M.

Feature	Celeron G470	Core i3-2310M
Cores / Threads	1 / 2	2 / 4+100%
Boost Clock	—	2.1 GHz
Base Clock	2 GHz	2.1 GHz+5%
L3 Cache	1.5 MB Intel® Smart Cache	3 MB (total)+100%
L2 Cache	—	256K (per core)
Process	32 nm	32 nm
Architecture	—	Sandy Bridge (2011−2013)
PassMark	1,225	1,222
Geekbench 6 Single	300	350+17%
Geekbench 6 Multi	—	658

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron G470 uses the LGA1155 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core i3-2310M uses PGA988 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3-1066 on the Celeron G470 versus DDR3-1333 on the Core i3-2310M — the Core i3-2310M supports 25% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Celeron G470 supports up to 32 GB of RAM compared to 16 GB — 100% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 16 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: H61,B65,H67,Z68 (Celeron G470) and Sandy Bridge (Core i3-2310M).

Feature	Celeron G470	Core i3-2310M
Socket	LGA1155	PGA988
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0+50%	PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR3-1066	DDR3-1333+25%
Max RAM Capacity	32 GB+100%	16 GB
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	No	No
PCIe Lanes	16	16

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Both support VT-x virtualization. Both include integrated graphics — HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge) (Celeron G470) and HD Graphics 3000 (Core i3-2310M) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron G470 targets Budget, Core i3-2310M targets Budget. Direct competitor: Celeron G470 rivals Pentium G630; Core i3-2310M rivals Athlon Silver 3050U.