PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Celeron G470 vs Pentium G620 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Celeron G470 vs Pentium G620: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Celeron G470

2013

Why buy it

✅Costs $29 less on MSRP ($35 MSRP vs $64 MSRP).
✅Delivers 80.9% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 35.0 vs 19.3 PassMark/$ ($35 MSRP vs $64 MSRP).
✅Draws 35W instead of 65W, a 30W reduction.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge), while Pentium G620 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (1,225 vs 1,238).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (1.5 MB vs 3 MB).

Pentium G620

2011

Why buy it

✅+100% larger total L3 cache (3 MB vs 1.5 MB).

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 19.3 vs 35.0 PassMark/$ ($64 MSRP vs $35 MSRP).
❌85.7% higher power demand at 65W vs 35W.
❌No integrated graphics, while Celeron G470 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Pentium G620 better than Celeron G470?

Yes. Pentium G620 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 0.4% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data and 1.1% better PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Pentium G620 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 0.4% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Pentium G620 is the stronger fit. You are getting 1.1% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 2 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 100% larger total L3 cache (3 MB vs 1.5 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Pentium G620 is still the much better call for a fresh build. Pentium G620 comes in 82.9% more expensive on MSRP at $64 MSRP versus $35 MSRP, and it still gives you a 0.4% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Celeron G470 only looks stronger on raw value math because it is extremely cheap, but that usually means used-market pricing on an obsolete 2013 platform. Even with 80.9% better value on paper (35.0 vs 19.3 PassMark/$), it really only makes sense as a cheap stopgap or a niche existing-platform option for someone already on LGA1155.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Celeron G470 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2013 vs 2011). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Celeron G470 vs Pentium G620 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Celeron G470

The Celeron G470 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It features 1 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency: 2 GHz. L3 cache: 1.5 MB Intel® Smart Cache. Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1155. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-1066, DDR3-1333. Passmark benchmark score: 1,225 points. Launch price was $69.

Pentium G620

The Pentium G620 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 22 May 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.6 GHz, with boost up to 2.6 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1155. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,238 points. Launch price was $60.

⚡

Processing Power

The Celeron G470 packs 1 cores / 2 threads, while the Pentium G620 offers 2 cores / 2 threads — the Pentium G620 has 1 more core. The Pentium G620 is built on the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture. In PassMark, the Celeron G470 scores 1,225 against the Pentium G620's 1,238 — a 1.1% lead for the Pentium G620. L3 cache: 1.5 MB Intel® Smart Cache on the Celeron G470 vs 3 MB (total) on the Pentium G620.

Feature	Celeron G470	Pentium G620
Cores / Threads	1 / 2	2 / 2+100%
Boost Clock	—	2.6 GHz
Base Clock	2 GHz	2.6 GHz+30%
L3 Cache	1.5 MB Intel® Smart Cache	3 MB (total)+100%
L2 Cache	—	256 kB (per core)
Process	32 nm	32 nm
Architecture	—	Sandy Bridge (2011−2013)
PassMark	1,225	1,238+1%
Geekbench 6 Single	300	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

Both processors use the LGA1155 socket with PCIe 3.0.

Feature	Celeron G470	Pentium G620
Socket	LGA1155	LGA1155
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0+50%	PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR3-1066	—
Max RAM Capacity	32 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	No	—
PCIe Lanes	16	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x (Celeron G470) / not specified (Pentium G620). The Celeron G470 includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge)), while the Pentium G620 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron G470 targets Budget. Direct competitor: Celeron G470 rivals Pentium G630.

Feature	Celeron G470	Pentium G620
Integrated GPU	Yes	—
IGPU Model	HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge)	—
Unlocked	No	—
AVX-512	No	—
Virtualization	VT-x	—
Target Use	Budget	—

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Celeron G470 was priced at $35, while the Pentium G620 came in at $64. On launch pricing ($35 vs $64), Celeron G470 was $29 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Celeron G470 delivers 35.0 pts/$ vs 19.3 pts/$ for the Pentium G620 — making the Celeron G470 the 57.6% better value option.

Feature	Celeron G470	Pentium G620
MSRP	$35-45%	$64
Performance per Dollar	35.0+81%	19.3
Release Date	2013	2011

Search Celeron G470 on Amazon

Search Pentium G620 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.