Celeron G470
VS
E2-6110

Celeron G470 vs E2-6110

Intel

Celeron G470

1 Cores2 Thrd35 WW2013
VS
AMD

E2-6110

4 Cores4 Thrd15 WWMax: 1.5 GHz2014

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Celeron G470 is positioned at rank 542 and the E2-6110 is on rank 864, so the Celeron G470 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Celeron G470

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
8906%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
8415%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
6110%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
1841%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
1458%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
1276%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
731%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
721%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
657%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
656%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
649%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
632%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
623%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
620%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
615%
#377
Core i3-9100HL
MSRP: $225|Avg: $100
99%
#378
Core i9-12900TE
MSRP: $494|Avg: $664
98%
#542
Celeron G470
MSRP: $35|Avg: $10
100%
#543
Pentium G3220
MSRP: $54|Avg: $15
100%
#545
Athlon 5370
MSRP: $55|Avg: $15
99%
#548
Core i3-6100
MSRP: $125|Avg: $30
98%
#549
Core i3-6300T
MSRP: $117|Avg: $15
97%
#550
Core i3-6098P
MSRP: $117|Avg: $59
97%
#551
Core i7-7800X
MSRP: $383|Avg: $254
97%
#552
Core i3-7101TE
MSRP: $117|Avg: $60
97%
#555
FX-8320E
MSRP: $147|Avg: $60
96%
#556
Pentium G3260
MSRP: $64|Avg: $21
94%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar E2-6110

#852
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
1426%
#853
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
1405%
#854
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
1290%
#855
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
1284%
#856
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
1273%
#858
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
1229%
#859
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
1178%
#860
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
1176%
#861
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
1145%
#864
E2-6110
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#867
Core i7-1160G7
MSRP: $426|Avg: N/A
100%
#873
Celeron M 540
MSRP: $86|Avg: $20
99%
#877
Microsoft SQ1
MSRP: $300|Avg: $180
98%
#879
Core i5-6440HQ
MSRP: $250|Avg: N/A
98%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Leadership: The E2-6110 delivers superior performance across the board. It outperforms the Celeron G470 in both compute-intensive tasks (0.7% faster) and gaming workloads.
InsightCeleron G470E2-6110
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
⚠️ Higher cost ($10)
More affordable ($0)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Legacy / 32 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Beema (2014) / 28 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

InsightCeleron G470E2-6110
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
⚠️ Higher cost ($10)
More affordable ($0)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Celeron G470 and E2-6110

Intel

Celeron G470

The Celeron G470 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It features 1 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency: 2 GHz. L3 cache: 1.5 MB Intel® Smart Cache. Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1155. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-1066, DDR3-1333. Passmark benchmark score: 1,225 points. Launch price was $69.

AMD

E2-6110

The E2-6110 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Beema (2014) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Max frequency: 1.5 GHz. L2 cache: 2048 kB. Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: FT3. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-1600. Passmark benchmark score: 1,234 points. Launch price was $50.

Processing Power

The Celeron G470 packs 1 cores / 2 threads, while the E2-6110 offers 4 cores / 4 threads — the E2-6110 has 3 more cores. The E2-6110 is built on the Beema (2014) architecture. In PassMark, the Celeron G470 scores 1,225 against the E2-6110's 1,234 — a 0.7% lead for the E2-6110.

FeatureCeleron G470E2-6110
Cores / Threads
1 / 2
4 / 4+300%
Boost Clock
1.5 GHz
Base Clock
2 GHz
L3 Cache
1.5 MB Intel® Smart Cache
L2 Cache
2048 kB
Process
32 nm
28 nm-13%
Architecture
Beema (2014)
PassMark
1,225
1,234
Geekbench 6 Single
300
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron G470 uses the LGA1155 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the E2-6110 uses FT3 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureCeleron G470E2-6110
Socket
LGA1155
FT3
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0
PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR3-1066
Max RAM Capacity
32 GB
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
16
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x (Celeron G470) / not specified (E2-6110). The Celeron G470 includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge)), while the E2-6110 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron G470 targets Budget. Direct competitor: Celeron G470 rivals Pentium G630.

FeatureCeleron G470E2-6110
Integrated GPU
Yes
IGPU Model
HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge)
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
VT-x
Target Use
Budget