Celeron G470 vs E2-6110

Celeron G470 vs E2-6110 Performance Spectrum

Celeron G470

1 / 2

1,225

0.0%

1,234

+0.7%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Celeron G470 vs E2-6110 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Celeron G470 vs E2-6110: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Celeron G470

2013

Why buy it

✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge), while E2-6110 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (1,225 vs 1,234).
❌Launch MSRP is still $35 MSRP, while E2-6110 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌133.3% higher power demand at 35W vs 15W.

E2-6110

2014

Why buy it

✅Draws 15W instead of 35W, a 20W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌No integrated graphics, while Celeron G470 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is E2-6110 better than Celeron G470?

Yes. E2-6110 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 2.3% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 0.7% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, E2-6110 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 2.3% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, E2-6110 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.7% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

E2-6110 is still the much better call for a fresh build. E2-6110 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $35 MSRP, and it still gives you a 2.3% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Celeron G470 only looks stronger on raw value math because it is extremely cheap, but that usually means used-market pricing on an obsolete 2013 platform. Even with 100.0% better value on paper (35.0 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), it really only makes sense as a cheap stopgap or a niche existing-platform option for someone already on LGA1155.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

E2-6110 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2014 vs 2013) and more multi-core headroom with 4 cores / 4 threads instead of 1/2. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Celeron G470 vs E2-6110 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Celeron G470

The Celeron G470 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It features 1 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency: 2 GHz. L3 cache: 1.5 MB Intel® Smart Cache. Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1155. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-1066, DDR3-1333. Passmark benchmark score: 1,225 points. Launch price was $69.

E2-6110

The E2-6110 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Beema (2014) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Max frequency: 1.5 GHz. L2 cache: 2048 kB. Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: FT3. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-1600. Passmark benchmark score: 1,234 points. Launch price was $50.

⚡

Processing Power

The Celeron G470 packs 1 cores / 2 threads, while the E2-6110 offers 4 cores / 4 threads — the E2-6110 has 3 more cores. The E2-6110 is built on the Beema (2014) architecture. In PassMark, the Celeron G470 scores 1,225 against the E2-6110's 1,234 — a 0.7% lead for the E2-6110.

Feature	Celeron G470	E2-6110
Cores / Threads	1 / 2	4 / 4+300%
Boost Clock	—	1.5 GHz
Base Clock	2 GHz	—
L3 Cache	1.5 MB Intel® Smart Cache	—
L2 Cache	—	2048 kB
Process	32 nm	28 nm-13%
Architecture	—	Beema (2014)
PassMark	1,225	1,234
Geekbench 6 Single	300	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron G470 uses the LGA1155 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the E2-6110 uses FT3 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Celeron G470	E2-6110
Socket	LGA1155	FT3
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR3-1066	—
Max RAM Capacity	32 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	No	—
PCIe Lanes	16	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x (Celeron G470) / not specified (E2-6110). The Celeron G470 includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge)), while the E2-6110 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron G470 targets Budget. Direct competitor: Celeron G470 rivals Pentium G630.