Celeron G470 vs Phenom X3 8450

Intel

Celeron G470

1 Cores2 Thrd35 WW2013
Similar parts
·······
VS
AMD

Phenom X3 8450

3 Cores3 Thrd95 WWMax: 2.1 GHz2008
Similar parts
·······

Celeron G470 vs Phenom X3 8450 Performance Spectrum

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Celeron G470 vs Phenom X3 8450 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Celeron G470 vs Phenom X3 8450: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Celeron G470

2013

Why buy it

  • Costs $110 less on MSRP ($35 MSRP vs $145 MSRP).
  • Delivers 315.6% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 35.0 vs 8.4 PassMark/$ ($35 MSRP vs $145 MSRP).
  • Draws 35W instead of 95W, a 60W reduction.
  • 100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
  • Integrated graphics onboard with HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge), while Phenom X3 8450 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

  • Smaller total L3 cache (1.5 MB vs 2 MB).

Phenom X3 8450

2008

Why buy it

  • +33.3% larger total L3 cache (2 MB vs 1.5 MB).

Trade-offs

  • Lower PassMark (1,221 vs 1,225).
  • Lower PassMark per dollar, at 8.4 vs 35.0 PassMark/$ ($145 MSRP vs $35 MSRP).
  • 171.4% higher power demand at 95W vs 35W.
  • No integrated graphics, while Celeron G470 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Celeron G470 better than Phenom X3 8450?
Yes. Celeron G470 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 0.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 0.3% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.
Which one is better for gaming?
If gaming is the priority, Celeron G470 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 0.1% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Celeron G470 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.3% better PassMark, backed by 1 cores and 2 threads.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Celeron G470 is the better buy right now. Celeron G470 comes in $110 cheaper on MSRP at $35 MSRP versus $145 MSRP, and it still gives you a 0.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 315.6% better value on MSRP (35.0 vs 8.4 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Celeron G470 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2013 vs 2008) and more multi-core headroom with 1 cores / 2 threads instead of 3/3. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Celeron G470 vs Phenom X3 8450 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Intel

Celeron G470

The Celeron G470 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It features 1 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency: 2 GHz. L3 cache: 1.5 MB Intel® Smart Cache. Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1155. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-1066, DDR3-1333. Passmark benchmark score: 1,225 points. Launch price was $69.

AMD

Phenom X3 8450

The Phenom X3 8450 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2009-01-01. It is based on the Toliman (2008) architecture. It features 3 cores and 3 threads. Max frequency: 2.1 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: AM2+. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 1,221 points. Launch price was $149.

Processing Power

The Celeron G470 packs 1 cores / 2 threads, while the Phenom X3 8450 offers 3 cores / 3 threads — the Phenom X3 8450 has 2 more cores. The Phenom X3 8450 is built on the Toliman (2008) architecture. In PassMark, the Celeron G470 scores 1,225 against the Phenom X3 8450's 1,221 — a 0.3% lead for the Celeron G470. L3 cache: 1.5 MB Intel® Smart Cache on the Celeron G470 vs 2 MB (total) on the Phenom X3 8450.

FeatureCeleron G470Phenom X3 8450
Cores / Threads
1 / 2
3 / 3+200%
Boost Clock
2.1 GHz
Base Clock
2 GHz
L3 Cache
1.5 MB Intel® Smart Cache
2 MB (total)+33%
L2 Cache
512 kB (per core)
Process
32 nm-51%
65 nm
Architecture
Toliman (2008)
PassMark
1,225
1,221
Geekbench 6 Single
300
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron G470 uses the LGA1155 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Phenom X3 8450 uses AM2+ (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureCeleron G470Phenom X3 8450
Socket
LGA1155
AM2+
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0+50%
PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR3-1066
Max RAM Capacity
32 GB
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
No
PCIe Lanes
16
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x (Celeron G470) / not specified (Phenom X3 8450). The Celeron G470 includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge)), while the Phenom X3 8450 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron G470 targets Budget. Direct competitor: Celeron G470 rivals Pentium G630.

FeatureCeleron G470Phenom X3 8450
Integrated GPU
Yes
IGPU Model
HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge)
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
VT-x
Target Use
Budget
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Celeron G470 was priced at $35, while the Phenom X3 8450 came in at $145. On launch pricing ($35 vs $145), Celeron G470 was $110 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Celeron G470 delivers 35.0 pts/$ vs 8.4 pts/$ for the Phenom X3 8450 — making the Celeron G470 the 122.4% better value option.

FeatureCeleron G470Phenom X3 8450
MSRP
$35-76%
$145
Performance per Dollar
35.0+317%
8.4
Release Date
2013
2008

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.