Celeron G470 vs Core 2 Duo E6420
Celeron G470
Core 2 Duo E6420
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Celeron G470 is positioned at rank 542 and the Core 2 Duo E6420 is on rank 1054, so the Celeron G470 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Celeron G470
Performance Per Dollar Core 2 Duo E6420
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Celeron G470 | Core 2 Duo E6420 |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ❌ Lower gaming performance | ✅ Superior gaming performance |
| Workstation | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks | ✅ Better multi-core power |
| Price | Equivalent pricing | Equivalent pricing |
| Longevity | 🛑 Legacy (Legacy / 32 nm) | 🛑 Legacy (Conroe (2006−2007) / 65 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Celeron G470 | Core 2 Duo E6420 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency | ✅ Better overall value (+1%) |
| Upfront Cost | Equivalent pricing | Equivalent pricing |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Celeron G470 and Core 2 Duo E6420
Celeron G470
The Celeron G470 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It features 1 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency: 2 GHz. L3 cache: 1.5 MB Intel® Smart Cache. Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1155. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-1066, DDR3-1333. Passmark benchmark score: 1,225 points. Launch price was $69.
Core 2 Duo E6420
The Core 2 Duo E6420 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2008-01-01. It is based on the Conroe (2006−2007) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.13 GHz, with boost up to 2.13 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 4 MB. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: LGA775. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR1, DDR2, DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,235 points. Launch price was $249.
Processing Power
The Celeron G470 packs 1 cores / 2 threads, while the Core 2 Duo E6420 offers 2 cores / 2 threads — the Core 2 Duo E6420 has 1 more core. The Core 2 Duo E6420 is built on the Conroe (2006−2007) architecture. In PassMark, the Celeron G470 scores 1,225 against the Core 2 Duo E6420's 1,235 — a 0.8% lead for the Core 2 Duo E6420. L3 cache: 1.5 MB Intel® Smart Cache on the Celeron G470 vs 0 kB on the Core 2 Duo E6420.
| Feature | Celeron G470 | Core 2 Duo E6420 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 1 / 2 | 2 / 2+100% |
| Boost Clock | — | 2.13 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2 GHz | 2.13 GHz+6% |
| L3 Cache | 1.5 MB Intel® Smart Cache | 0 kB |
| L2 Cache | — | 4 MB |
| Process | 32 nm-51% | 65 nm |
| Architecture | — | Conroe (2006−2007) |
| PassMark | 1,225 | 1,235 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 300 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Celeron G470 uses the LGA1155 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core 2 Duo E6420 uses LGA775 (PCIe 1.1) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3-1066 on the Celeron G470 versus 1066 on the Core 2 Duo E6420 — the Core 2 Duo E6420 supports 198.9% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Celeron G470 supports up to 32 GB of RAM compared to 16 — 66.7% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 16 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: H61,B65,H67,Z68 (Celeron G470) and P35,G31,G33,P45 (Core 2 Duo E6420).
| Feature | Celeron G470 | Core 2 Duo E6420 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1155 | LGA775 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0+173% | PCIe 1.1 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR3-1066 | 1066+35433% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 32 GB+209715100% | 16 |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | ❌ | ❌ |
| PCIe Lanes | 16 | 16 |
Advanced Features
Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: VT-x (Celeron G470) vs true (Core 2 Duo E6420). The Celeron G470 includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge)), while the Core 2 Duo E6420 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron G470 targets Budget. Direct competitor: Celeron G470 rivals Pentium G630; Core 2 Duo E6420 rivals Athlon 64 X2 5400+.
| Feature | Celeron G470 | Core 2 Duo E6420 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | No |
| IGPU Model | HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge) | None |
| Unlocked | No | No |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | VT-x | true |
| Target Use | Budget | — |
Value Analysis
The Celeron G470 launched at $35 MSRP, while the Core 2 Duo E6420 debuted at $183. At current prices ($10 vs $10), the Core 2 Duo E6420 is $0 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Celeron G470 delivers 122.5 pts/$ vs 123.5 pts/$ for the Core 2 Duo E6420 — making the Core 2 Duo E6420 the 0.8% better value option.
| Feature | Celeron G470 | Core 2 Duo E6420 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $35-81% | $183 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $10 | $10 |
| Performance per Dollar | 122.5 | 123.5 |
| Release Date | 2013 | 2007 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Celeron G470 and Core 2 Duo E6420
