Celeron G470 vs Xeon 5140

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Celeron G470 vs Xeon 5140 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Celeron G470 vs Xeon 5140: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Celeron G470

2013

Why buy it

✅Draws 35W instead of 65W, a 30W reduction.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge), while Xeon 5140 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (1,225 vs 1,235).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon 5140, which brings 2 cores / 2 threads.
❌Launch MSRP is still $35 MSRP, while Xeon 5140 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.

Xeon 5140

2006

Why buy it

✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 2 cores / 2 threads.

Trade-offs

❌85.7% higher power demand at 65W vs 35W.
❌No integrated graphics, while Celeron G470 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon 5140 better than Celeron G470?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon 5140 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Celeron G470 is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Xeon 5140 has the edge because it leads the single-thread side of this matchup with 0.8% stronger overall PassMark.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon 5140 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.8% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 2 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Xeon 5140 is still the much better call for a fresh build. Xeon 5140 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $35 MSRP, and it still gives you 0.8% higher PassMark. Celeron G470 only looks stronger on raw value math because it is extremely cheap, but that usually means used-market pricing on an obsolete 2013 platform. Even with 100.0% better value on paper (35.0 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), it really only makes sense as a cheap stopgap or a niche existing-platform option for someone already on LGA1155.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Celeron G470 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2013 vs 2006). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Celeron G470 vs Xeon 5140 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Celeron G470

The Celeron G470 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It features 1 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency: 2 GHz. L3 cache: 1.5 MB Intel® Smart Cache. Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1155. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-1066, DDR3-1333. Passmark benchmark score: 1,225 points. Launch price was $69.

Xeon 5140

The Xeon 5140 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in Junho 2006 (19 years ago). It is based on the Woodcrest (2006) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.33 GHz, with boost up to 2.33 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 4 MB. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: LGA771. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR2. Passmark benchmark score: 1,235 points. Launch price was $15.

⚡

Processing Power

The Celeron G470 packs 1 cores / 2 threads, while the Xeon 5140 offers 2 cores / 2 threads — the Xeon 5140 has 1 more core. The Xeon 5140 is built on the Woodcrest (2006) architecture. In PassMark, the Celeron G470 scores 1,225 against the Xeon 5140's 1,235 — a 0.8% lead for the Xeon 5140. L3 cache: 1.5 MB Intel® Smart Cache on the Celeron G470 vs 0 kB on the Xeon 5140.

Feature	Celeron G470	Xeon 5140
Cores / Threads	1 / 2	2 / 2+100%
Boost Clock	—	2.33 GHz
Base Clock	2 GHz	2.33 GHz+17%
L3 Cache	1.5 MB Intel® Smart Cache	0 kB
L2 Cache	—	4 MB
Process	32 nm-51%	65 nm
Architecture	—	Woodcrest (2006)
PassMark	1,225	1,235
Geekbench 6 Single	300	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron G470 uses the LGA1155 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon 5140 uses LGA771 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Celeron G470	Xeon 5140
Socket	LGA1155	LGA771
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0+50%	PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR3-1066	—
Max RAM Capacity	32 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	No	—
PCIe Lanes	16	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x (Celeron G470) / not specified (Xeon 5140). The Celeron G470 includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge)), while the Xeon 5140 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron G470 targets Budget. Direct competitor: Celeron G470 rivals Pentium G630.