PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Celeron G470 vs Core 2 Duo E4600 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Celeron G470 vs Core 2 Duo E4600: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Celeron G470

2013

Why buy it

✅Costs $98 less on MSRP ($35 MSRP vs $133 MSRP).
✅Delivers 276.9% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 35.0 vs 9.3 PassMark/$ ($35 MSRP vs $133 MSRP).
✅Draws 35W instead of 65W, a 30W reduction.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge), while Core 2 Duo E4600 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (1,225 vs 1,235).

Core 2 Duo E4600

2007

Why buy it

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 9.3 vs 35.0 PassMark/$ ($133 MSRP vs $35 MSRP).
❌85.7% higher power demand at 65W vs 35W.
❌No integrated graphics, while Celeron G470 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Core 2 Duo E4600 better than Celeron G470?

Yes. Core 2 Duo E4600 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 2.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data and 0.8% better PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Core 2 Duo E4600 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 2.2% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core 2 Duo E4600 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.8% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 2 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core 2 Duo E4600 is still the much better call for a fresh build. Core 2 Duo E4600 comes in 280.0% more expensive on MSRP at $133 MSRP versus $35 MSRP, and it still gives you a 2.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Celeron G470 only looks stronger on raw value math because it is extremely cheap, but that usually means used-market pricing on an obsolete 2013 platform. Even with 276.9% better value on paper (35.0 vs 9.3 PassMark/$), it really only makes sense as a cheap stopgap or a niche existing-platform option for someone already on LGA1155.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Celeron G470 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2013 vs 2007). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Celeron G470 vs Core 2 Duo E4600 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Celeron G470

The Celeron G470 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It features 1 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency: 2 GHz. L3 cache: 1.5 MB Intel® Smart Cache. Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1155. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-1066, DDR3-1333. Passmark benchmark score: 1,225 points. Launch price was $69.

Core 2 Duo E4600

The Core 2 Duo E4600 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2008-01-01. It is based on the Allendale (2006−2009) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 2.4 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: LGA775. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR1, DDR2, DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,235 points. Launch price was $249.

⚡

Processing Power

The Celeron G470 packs 1 cores / 2 threads, while the Core 2 Duo E4600 offers 2 cores / 2 threads — the Core 2 Duo E4600 has 1 more core. The Core 2 Duo E4600 is built on the Allendale (2006−2009) architecture. In PassMark, the Celeron G470 scores 1,225 against the Core 2 Duo E4600's 1,235 — a 0.8% lead for the Core 2 Duo E4600. L3 cache: 1.5 MB Intel® Smart Cache on the Celeron G470 vs 0 kB on the Core 2 Duo E4600.

Feature	Celeron G470	Core 2 Duo E4600
Cores / Threads	1 / 2	2 / 2+100%
Boost Clock	—	2.4 GHz
Base Clock	2 GHz	2.4 GHz+20%
L3 Cache	1.5 MB Intel® Smart Cache	0 kB
L2 Cache	—	2 MB
Process	32 nm-51%	65 nm
Architecture	—	Allendale (2006−2009)
PassMark	1,225	1,235
Geekbench 6 Single	300	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron G470 uses the LGA1155 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core 2 Duo E4600 uses LGA775 (PCIe 1.1) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3-1066 on the Celeron G470 versus DDR2-800 on the Core 2 Duo E4600 — the Celeron G470 supports 33.3% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Celeron G470 supports up to 32 GB of RAM compared to 16 GB — 100% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 16 (Celeron G470) vs 0 (Core 2 Duo E4600) — the Celeron G470 offers 16 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: H61,B65,H67,Z68 (Celeron G470) and Q963,P35,G31 (Core 2 Duo E4600).

Feature	Celeron G470	Core 2 Duo E4600
Socket	LGA1155	LGA775
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0+173%	PCIe 1.1
Max RAM Speed	DDR3-1066+33%	DDR2-800
Max RAM Capacity	32 GB+100%	16 GB
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	No	No
PCIe Lanes	16	0

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x (Celeron G470) / not specified (Core 2 Duo E4600). The Celeron G470 includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge)), while the Core 2 Duo E4600 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron G470 targets Budget. Direct competitor: Celeron G470 rivals Pentium G630.

Feature	Celeron G470	Core 2 Duo E4600
Integrated GPU	Yes	No
IGPU Model	HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge)	—
Unlocked	No	—
AVX-512	No	—
Virtualization	VT-x	—
Target Use	Budget	—

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Celeron G470 was priced at $35, while the Core 2 Duo E4600 came in at $133. On launch pricing ($35 vs $133), Celeron G470 was $98 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Celeron G470 delivers 35.0 pts/$ vs 9.3 pts/$ for the Core 2 Duo E4600 — making the Celeron G470 the 116.1% better value option.

Feature	Celeron G470	Core 2 Duo E4600
MSRP	$35-74%	$133
Performance per Dollar	35.0+276%	9.3
Release Date	2013	2007

Search Celeron G470 on Amazon

Search Core 2 Duo E4600 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.