Celeron G470 vs Phenom II X2 545

Celeron G470 vs Phenom II X2 545 Performance Spectrum

Celeron G470

1 / 2

1,225

0.0%

1,233

+0.7%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Celeron G470 vs Phenom II X2 545 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Celeron G470 vs Phenom II X2 545: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Celeron G470

2013

Why buy it

✅Draws 35W instead of 80W, a 45W reduction.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge), while Phenom II X2 545 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (1,225 vs 1,233).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (1.5 MB vs 6 MB).
❌Launch MSRP is still $35 MSRP, while Phenom II X2 545 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.

Phenom II X2 545

2009

Why buy it

✅+300% larger total L3 cache (6 MB vs 1.5 MB).

Trade-offs

❌128.6% higher power demand at 80W vs 35W.
❌No integrated graphics, while Celeron G470 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Phenom II X2 545 better than Celeron G470?

Yes. Phenom II X2 545 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 0.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data and 0.7% better PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Phenom II X2 545 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 0.1% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Phenom II X2 545 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.7% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 2 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 300% larger total L3 cache (6 MB vs 1.5 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Phenom II X2 545 is still the much better call for a fresh build. Phenom II X2 545 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $35 MSRP, and it still gives you a 0.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Celeron G470 only looks stronger on raw value math because it is extremely cheap, but that usually means used-market pricing on an obsolete 2013 platform. Even with 100.0% better value on paper (35.0 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), it really only makes sense as a cheap stopgap or a niche existing-platform option for someone already on LGA1155.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Celeron G470 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2013 vs 2009). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Celeron G470 vs Phenom II X2 545 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Celeron G470

The Celeron G470 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It features 1 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency: 2 GHz. L3 cache: 1.5 MB Intel® Smart Cache. Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1155. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-1066, DDR3-1333. Passmark benchmark score: 1,225 points. Launch price was $69.

Phenom II X2 545

The Phenom II X2 545 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 1 June 2009 (16 years ago). It is based on the Callisto (2009−2010) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 3 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB (per core). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: AM3. Thermal design power (TDP): 80 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,233 points. Launch price was $50.

⚡

Processing Power

The Celeron G470 packs 1 cores / 2 threads, while the Phenom II X2 545 offers 2 cores / 2 threads — the Phenom II X2 545 has 1 more core. The Phenom II X2 545 is built on the Callisto (2009−2010) architecture. In PassMark, the Celeron G470 scores 1,225 against the Phenom II X2 545's 1,233 — a 0.7% lead for the Phenom II X2 545. L3 cache: 1.5 MB Intel® Smart Cache on the Celeron G470 vs 6 MB (per core) on the Phenom II X2 545.

Feature	Celeron G470	Phenom II X2 545
Cores / Threads	1 / 2	2 / 2+100%
Boost Clock	—	3 GHz
Base Clock	2 GHz	3 GHz+50%
L3 Cache	1.5 MB Intel® Smart Cache	6 MB (per core)+300%
L2 Cache	—	512 kB (per core)
Process	32 nm-29%	45 nm
Architecture	—	Callisto (2009−2010)
PassMark	1,225	1,233
Geekbench 6 Single	300	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron G470 uses the LGA1155 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Phenom II X2 545 uses AM3 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Celeron G470	Phenom II X2 545
Socket	LGA1155	AM3
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0+50%	PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR3-1066	—
Max RAM Capacity	32 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	No	—
PCIe Lanes	16	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x (Celeron G470) / not specified (Phenom II X2 545). The Celeron G470 includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge)), while the Phenom II X2 545 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron G470 targets Budget. Direct competitor: Celeron G470 rivals Pentium G630.