A6-5357M vs Core i3-2310M

A6-5357M vs Core i3-2310M Performance Spectrum

A6-5357M

2 / 2

1,219

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Core i3-2310M

2 / 4

1,222

+0.2%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

A6-5357M vs Core i3-2310M FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

A6-5357M vs Core i3-2310M: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

A6-5357M

2013

Why buy it

✅+8.6% higher Geekbench single-core performance for gaming and desktop responsiveness.
✅Draws 35W instead of 512W, a 477W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (1,219 vs 1,222).

Core i3-2310M

2011

Why buy it

✅+0.2% higher PassMark.

Trade-offs

❌Lower Geekbench single-core performance for gaming (350 vs 380).
❌1362.9% higher power demand at 512W vs 35W.

Quick Answers

So, is A6-5357M better than Core i3-2310M?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, A6-5357M is ahead with a 1.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Core i3-2310M pulls ahead with 0.2% better PassMark.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i3-2310M is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.2% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

A6-5357M still makes the most sense overall. A6-5357M comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 1.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

A6-5357M makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2013 vs 2011). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

A6-5357M vs Core i3-2310M Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

A6-5357M

The A6-5357M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Richland (2013−2014) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.9 GHz, with boost up to 3.5 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: FP2. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,219 points. Launch price was $70.

Core i3-2310M

The Core i3-2310M is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 February 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.1 GHz, with boost up to 2.1 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: PGA988. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,222 points. Launch price was $225.

⚡

Processing Power

The A6-5357M packs 2 cores / 2 threads, matching the Core i3-2310M's 2 cores. Boost clocks reach 3.5 GHz on the A6-5357M versus 2.1 GHz on the Core i3-2310M — a 50% clock advantage for the A6-5357M (base: 2.9 GHz vs 2.1 GHz). The A6-5357M uses the Richland (2013−2014) architecture (32 nm), while the Core i3-2310M uses Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) (32 nm). In PassMark, the A6-5357M scores 1,219 against the Core i3-2310M's 1,222 — a 0.2% lead for the Core i3-2310M. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 380 vs 350, a 8.2% lead for the A6-5357M that directly translates to higher frame rates. L3 cache: 0 kB on the A6-5357M vs 3 MB (total) on the Core i3-2310M.

Feature	A6-5357M	Core i3-2310M
Cores / Threads	2 / 2	2 / 4
Boost Clock	3.5 GHz+67%	2.1 GHz
Base Clock	2.9 GHz+38%	2.1 GHz
L3 Cache	0 kB	3 MB (total)
L2 Cache	512K (per core)+100%	256K (per core)
Process	32 nm	32 nm
Architecture	Richland (2013−2014)	Sandy Bridge (2011−2013)
PassMark	1,219	1,222
Geekbench 6 Single	380+9%	350
Geekbench 6 Multi	—	658

🧠

Memory & Platform

The A6-5357M uses the FP2 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core i3-2310M uses PGA988 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3-1600 on the A6-5357M versus DDR3-1333 on the Core i3-2310M — the A6-5357M supports 20% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. Both support up to 16 GB of RAM. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 16 PCIe lanes.

Feature	A6-5357M	Core i3-2310M
Socket	FP2	PGA988
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0+50%	PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR3-1600+20%	DDR3-1333
Max RAM Capacity	16 GB	16 GB
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	No	No
PCIe Lanes	16	16

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: AMD-V (A6-5357M) vs VT-x (Core i3-2310M). Both include integrated graphics — Radeon HD 8450G (A6-5357M) and HD Graphics 3000 (Core i3-2310M) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: A6-5357M targets Budget Laptop, Core i3-2310M targets Budget. Direct competitor: A6-5357M rivals Core i3-3120M; Core i3-2310M rivals Athlon Silver 3050U.