A6-5357M vs Pentium Dual Core T4300

AMD

A6-5357M

2 Cores2 Thrd35 WWMax: 3.5 GHz2013
Similar parts
·······
VS
Intel

Pentium Dual Core T4300

2 Cores2 Thrd35 WWMax: 2.1 GHz2009

A6-5357M vs Pentium Dual Core T4300 Performance Spectrum

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

A6-5357M vs Pentium Dual Core T4300 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

A6-5357M vs Pentium Dual Core T4300: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

A6-5357M

2013

Why buy it

  • 100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
  • Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon HD 8450G, while Pentium Dual Core T4300 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

  • Lower PassMark (1,219 vs 1,232).

Pentium Dual Core T4300

2009

Why buy it

  • +1.1% higher PassMark.

Trade-offs

  • Launch MSRP is still $150 MSRP, while A6-5357M mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
  • No integrated graphics, while A6-5357M can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Pentium Dual Core T4300 better than A6-5357M?
It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, A6-5357M is ahead with a 2.7% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Pentium Dual Core T4300 pulls ahead with 1.1% better PassMark.
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Pentium Dual Core T4300 is the stronger fit. You are getting 1.1% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 2 threads.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Pentium Dual Core T4300 is the better buy right now. Pentium Dual Core T4300 comes in at an unclear MSRP at $150 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you 1.1% better PassMark. The compromise is that A6-5357M is still the better pure gaming CPU with a 2.7% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (8.2 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
A6-5357M makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2013 vs 2009). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

A6-5357M vs Pentium Dual Core T4300 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

AMD

A6-5357M

The A6-5357M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Richland (2013−2014) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.9 GHz, with boost up to 3.5 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: FP2. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,219 points. Launch price was $70.

Intel

Pentium Dual Core T4300

The Pentium Dual Core T4300 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the NetBurst (2000−2006) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.1 GHz, with boost up to 2.1 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: P. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,232 points. Launch price was $69.

Processing Power

Both the A6-5357M and Pentium Dual Core T4300 share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 3.5 GHz on the A6-5357M versus 2.1 GHz on the Pentium Dual Core T4300 — a 50% clock advantage for the A6-5357M (base: 2.9 GHz vs 2.1 GHz). The A6-5357M uses the Richland (2013−2014) architecture (32 nm), while the Pentium Dual Core T4300 uses NetBurst (2000−2006) (45 nm). In PassMark, the A6-5357M scores 1,219 against the Pentium Dual Core T4300's 1,232 — a 1.1% lead for the Pentium Dual Core T4300. Both processors carry 0 kB of L3 cache.

FeatureA6-5357MPentium Dual Core T4300
Cores / Threads
2 / 2
2 / 2
Boost Clock
3.5 GHz+67%
2.1 GHz
Base Clock
2.9 GHz+38%
2.1 GHz
L3 Cache
0 kB
0 kB
L2 Cache
512K (per core)+51100%
1 MB
Process
32 nm-29%
45 nm
Architecture
Richland (2013−2014)
NetBurst (2000−2006)
PassMark
1,219
1,232+1%
Geekbench 6 Single
380
🧠

Memory & Platform

The A6-5357M uses the FP2 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Pentium Dual Core T4300 uses P (PCIe 1.1) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3-1600 on the A6-5357M versus DDR3-800 on the Pentium Dual Core T4300 — the A6-5357M supports 100% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The A6-5357M supports up to 16 GB of RAM compared to 8 GB 100% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 16 (A6-5357M) vs 0 (Pentium Dual Core T4300) — the A6-5357M offers 16 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives.

FeatureA6-5357MPentium Dual Core T4300
Socket
FP2
P
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0+173%
PCIe 1.1
Max RAM Speed
DDR3-1600+100%
DDR3-800
Max RAM Capacity
16 GB+100%
8 GB
RAM Channels
2
2
ECC Support
No
No
PCIe Lanes
16
0
🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: AMD-V (A6-5357M) vs No VT-x (Pentium Dual Core T4300). The A6-5357M includes integrated graphics (Radeon HD 8450G), while the Pentium Dual Core T4300 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: A6-5357M targets Budget Laptop, Pentium Dual Core T4300 targets Mobile. Direct competitor: A6-5357M rivals Core i3-3120M.

FeatureA6-5357MPentium Dual Core T4300
Integrated GPU
Yes
No
IGPU Model
Radeon HD 8450G
Unlocked
No
No
AVX-512
No
No
Virtualization
AMD-V
No VT-x
Target Use
Budget Laptop
Mobile