A6-5357M vs Celeron G470

A6-5357M vs Celeron G470 Performance Spectrum

A6-5357M

2 / 2

1,219

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Celeron G470

1 / 2

1,225

+0.5%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

A6-5357M vs Celeron G470 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

A6-5357M vs Celeron G470: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

A6-5357M

2013

Why buy it

✅+26.7% higher Geekbench single-core performance for gaming and desktop responsiveness.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (1,219 vs 1,225).

Celeron G470

2013

Why buy it

✅+0.5% higher PassMark.

Trade-offs

❌Lower Geekbench single-core performance for gaming (300 vs 380).
❌Launch MSRP is still $35 MSRP, while A6-5357M mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.

Quick Answers

So, is Celeron G470 better than A6-5357M?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, A6-5357M is ahead with a 0.7% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Celeron G470 pulls ahead with 0.5% better PassMark.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Celeron G470 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.5% better PassMark, backed by 1 cores and 2 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Celeron G470 is the better buy right now. Celeron G470 comes in at an unclear MSRP at $35 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you 0.5% better PassMark. The compromise is that A6-5357M is still the better pure gaming CPU with a 0.7% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (35.0 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Celeron G470 is the safer long-term CPU choice because it gives you more room to grow and a better platform outlook.

A6-5357M vs Celeron G470 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

A6-5357M

The A6-5357M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Richland (2013−2014) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.9 GHz, with boost up to 3.5 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: FP2. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,219 points. Launch price was $70.

Celeron G470

The Celeron G470 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It features 1 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency: 2 GHz. L3 cache: 1.5 MB Intel® Smart Cache. Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1155. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-1066, DDR3-1333. Passmark benchmark score: 1,225 points. Launch price was $69.

⚡

Processing Power

The A6-5357M packs 2 cores / 2 threads, while the Celeron G470 offers 1 cores / 2 threads — the A6-5357M has 1 more core. The A6-5357M is built on the Richland (2013−2014) architecture. In PassMark, the A6-5357M scores 1,219 against the Celeron G470's 1,225 — a 0.5% lead for the Celeron G470. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 380 vs 300, a 23.5% lead for the A6-5357M that directly translates to higher frame rates. L3 cache: 0 kB on the A6-5357M vs 1.5 MB Intel® Smart Cache on the Celeron G470.

Feature	A6-5357M	Celeron G470
Cores / Threads	2 / 2+100%	1 / 2
Boost Clock	3.5 GHz	—
Base Clock	2.9 GHz+45%	2 GHz
L3 Cache	0 kB	1.5 MB Intel® Smart Cache
L2 Cache	512K (per core)	—
Process	32 nm	32 nm
Architecture	Richland (2013−2014)	—
PassMark	1,219	1,225
Geekbench 6 Single	380+27%	300

🧠

Memory & Platform

The A6-5357M uses the FP2 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Celeron G470 uses LGA1155 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3-1600 on the A6-5357M versus DDR3-1066 on the Celeron G470 — the A6-5357M supports 50.1% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Celeron G470 supports up to 32 GB of RAM compared to 16 GB — 100% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 16 PCIe lanes.

Feature	A6-5357M	Celeron G470
Socket	FP2	LGA1155
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR3-1600+50%	DDR3-1066
Max RAM Capacity	16 GB	32 GB+100%
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	No	No
PCIe Lanes	16	16

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: AMD-V (A6-5357M) vs VT-x (Celeron G470). Both include integrated graphics — Radeon HD 8450G (A6-5357M) and HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge) (Celeron G470) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: A6-5357M targets Budget Laptop, Celeron G470 targets Budget. Direct competitor: A6-5357M rivals Core i3-3120M; Celeron G470 rivals Pentium G630.