A6-5357M vs Celeron 3855U

A6-5357M vs Celeron 3855U Performance Spectrum

A6-5357M

2 / 2

1,219

+0.3%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Celeron 3855U

2 / 2

1,215

0.0%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

A6-5357M vs Celeron 3855U FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

A6-5357M vs Celeron 3855U: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

A6-5357M

2013

Why buy it

✅+5.3% higher Geekbench single-core performance for gaming and desktop responsiveness.
✅60% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 10) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌133.3% higher power demand at 35W vs 15W.

Celeron 3855U

2015

Why buy it

✅Draws 15W instead of 35W, a 20W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower Geekbench single-core performance for gaming (361 vs 380).
❌Lower PassMark (1,215 vs 1,219).

Quick Answers

So, is A6-5357M better than Celeron 3855U?

Yes. A6-5357M is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 0.5% average FPS lead across 48 shared CPU game tests in our data and 0.3% better PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, A6-5357M is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 0.5% more average FPS across 48 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, A6-5357M is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.3% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 2 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

A6-5357M still makes the most sense overall. A6-5357M comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 0.5% average FPS lead across 48 shared CPU game tests in our data.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Celeron 3855U makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2015 vs 2013). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

A6-5357M vs Celeron 3855U Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

A6-5357M

The A6-5357M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Richland (2013−2014) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.9 GHz, with boost up to 3.5 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: FP2. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,219 points. Launch price was $70.

Celeron 3855U

The Celeron 3855U is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 15 August 2015 (10 years ago). It is based on the Skylake (2015−2016) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.6 GHz, with boost up to 1.6 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1356. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-1866/2133, LPDDR3-1600/1866, DDR3L-1333/1600. Passmark benchmark score: 1,215 points. Launch price was $107.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the A6-5357M and Celeron 3855U share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 3.5 GHz on the A6-5357M versus 1.6 GHz on the Celeron 3855U — a 74.5% clock advantage for the A6-5357M (base: 2.9 GHz vs 1.6 GHz). The A6-5357M uses the Richland (2013−2014) architecture (32 nm), while the Celeron 3855U uses Skylake (2015−2016) (14 nm). In PassMark, the A6-5357M scores 1,219 against the Celeron 3855U's 1,215 — a 0.3% lead for the A6-5357M. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 380 vs 361, a 5.1% lead for the A6-5357M that directly translates to higher frame rates. L3 cache: 0 kB on the A6-5357M vs 2 MB on the Celeron 3855U.

Feature	A6-5357M	Celeron 3855U
Cores / Threads	2 / 2	2 / 2
Boost Clock	3.5 GHz+119%	1.6 GHz
Base Clock	2.9 GHz+81%	1.6 GHz
L3 Cache	0 kB	2 MB
L2 Cache	512K (per core)	512 kB
Process	32 nm	14 nm-56%
Architecture	Richland (2013−2014)	Skylake (2015−2016)
PassMark	1,219	1,215
Geekbench 6 Single	380+5%	361
Geekbench 6 Multi	—	632

🧠

Memory & Platform

The A6-5357M uses the FP2 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Celeron 3855U uses BGA1356 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3-1600 on the A6-5357M versus DDR4 2133 MHz on the Celeron 3855U — the Celeron 3855U supports 33.3% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Celeron 3855U supports up to 32 GB of RAM compared to 16 GB — 100% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 16 (A6-5357M) vs 10 (Celeron 3855U) — the A6-5357M offers 6 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives.

Feature	A6-5357M	Celeron 3855U
Socket	FP2	BGA1356
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR3-1600	DDR4 2133 MHz+33%
Max RAM Capacity	16 GB	32 GB+100%
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	No	No
PCIe Lanes	16+60%	10

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: AMD-V (A6-5357M) vs true (Celeron 3855U). Both include integrated graphics — Radeon HD 8450G (A6-5357M) and Intel HD Graphics 510 (Celeron 3855U) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: A6-5357M targets Budget Laptop, Celeron 3855U targets Budget. Direct competitor: A6-5357M rivals Core i3-3120M; Celeron 3855U rivals Pentium 3825U.