Core i3-2340UE
VS
A9-9420

Core i3-2340UE vs A9-9420

Intel

Core i3-2340UE

2 Cores4 Thrd17 WWMax: 1.3 GHz2011
VS
AMD

A9-9420

2 Cores2 Thrd15 WWMax: 3.6 GHz2016

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Core i3-2340UE is positioned at rank 1137 and the A9-9420 is on rank 1074, so the A9-9420 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Core i3-2340UE

#1125
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
3796%
#1126
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
3740%
#1127
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
3433%
#1128
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
3418%
#1129
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
3387%
#1131
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
3270%
#1132
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
3136%
#1133
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
3131%
#1134
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
3047%
#1137
Core i3-2340UE
MSRP: $200|Avg: $200
100%
#1138
Core i7-2820QM
MSRP: $568|Avg: N/A
100%
#1139
Core i5-520M
MSRP: $225|Avg: N/A
99%
#1141
Celeron 807
MSRP: $70|Avg: $10
99%
#1142
Pentium B950
MSRP: $134|Avg: $35
99%
#1143
Celeron 220
MSRP: $42|Avg: $42
99%
#1144
Pentium B960
MSRP: $134|Avg: $15
98%
#1146
Pentium 957
MSRP: $134|Avg: $10
98%
#1147
Core 2 Duo SL9400
MSRP: $284|Avg: N/A
98%
#1149
Pentium N3540
MSRP: $161|Avg: $161
97%
#1150
Core i7-3555LE
MSRP: $300|Avg: $280
97%
#1151
Core i3-2377M
MSRP: $250|Avg: N/A
96%
#1152
Core 2 Duo E8435
MSRP: $150|Avg: $74
95%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar A9-9420

#1062
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
2862%
#1063
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
2820%
#1064
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
2589%
#1065
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
2578%
#1066
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
2554%
#1068
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
2466%
#1069
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
2365%
#1070
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
2361%
#1071
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
2298%
#1074
A9-9420
MSRP: $150|Avg: $30
100%
#1075
Celeron B730
MSRP: $70|Avg: $10
100%
#1078
A9-9425
MSRP: $150|Avg: $30
99%
#1080
Core i5-4402E
MSRP: $266|Avg: $100
98%
#1081
A6-7000
MSRP: $100|Avg: $15
98%
#1083
Core i5-2520M
MSRP: $225|Avg: N/A
97%
#1084
Core i7-2710QE
MSRP: $378|Avg: $40
97%
#1089
Core i5-3610ME
MSRP: $276|Avg: $22
94%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Trade-off: The A9-9420 leads in gaming performance. However, the Core i3-2340UE is the stronger candidate for professional workloads, offering 0.5% greater multi-core processing power.
InsightCore i3-2340UEA9-9420
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Better multi-core power
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Price
⚠️ Higher cost ($200)
More affordable ($30)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) / 32 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Stoney Ridge (2016−2019) / 28 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

Efficiency: Even within a comparison of older hardware, the A9-9420 stands out as the superior choice. It is effectively 85% cheaper ($30 vs $200) while identifying as the stronger performer.
InsightCore i3-2340UEA9-9420
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Better overall value (+564%)
Upfront Cost
⚠️ Higher cost ($200)
More affordable ($30)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core i3-2340UE and A9-9420

Intel

Core i3-2340UE

The Core i3-2340UE is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 June 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Max frequency: 1.3 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1023. Thermal design power (TDP): 17 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,545 points. Launch price was $250.

AMD

A9-9420

The A9-9420 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 31 May 2016 (9 years ago). It is based on the Stoney Ridge (2016−2019) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 3.6 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 1 MB (total). Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: FT4. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 1,538 points. Launch price was $69.

Processing Power

The Core i3-2340UE packs 2 cores / 4 threads, matching the A9-9420's 2 cores. Boost clocks reach 1.3 GHz on the Core i3-2340UE versus 3.6 GHz on the A9-9420 — a 93.9% clock advantage for the A9-9420. The Core i3-2340UE uses the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture (32 nm), while the A9-9420 uses Stoney Ridge (2016−2019) (28 nm). In PassMark, the Core i3-2340UE scores 1,545 against the A9-9420's 1,538 — a 0.5% lead for the Core i3-2340UE. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 230 vs 497, a 73.5% lead for the A9-9420 that directly translates to higher frame rates. L3 cache: 3 MB (total) on the Core i3-2340UE vs 0 kB on the A9-9420.

FeatureCore i3-2340UEA9-9420
Cores / Threads
2 / 4
2 / 2
Boost Clock
1.3 GHz
3.6 GHz+177%
Base Clock
3 GHz
L3 Cache
3 MB (total)
0 kB
L2 Cache
256K (per core)
1 MB (total)+300%
Process
32 nm
28 nm-13%
Architecture
Sandy Bridge (2011−2013)
Stoney Ridge (2016−2019)
PassMark
1,545
1,538
Geekbench 6 Single
230
497+116%
Geekbench 6 Multi
950
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i3-2340UE uses the BGA1023 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the A9-9420 uses FT4 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3-1333 on the Core i3-2340UE versus DDR4-2133 on the A9-9420 — the A9-9420 supports 28.6% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Core i3-2340UE supports up to 16 GB of RAM compared to 8 GB 66.7% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Core i3-2340UE) vs 1 (A9-9420). PCIe lanes: 16 (Core i3-2340UE) vs 8 (A9-9420) — the Core i3-2340UE offers 8 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: HM65,QM67 (Core i3-2340UE) and SoC (A9-9420).

FeatureCore i3-2340UEA9-9420
Socket
BGA1023
FT4
PCIe Generation
PCIe 2.0
PCIe 3.0+50%
Max RAM Speed
DDR3-1333
DDR4-2133+33%
Max RAM Capacity
16 GB+100%
8 GB
RAM Channels
2+100%
1
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
16+100%
8
🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: VT-x, EPT (Core i3-2340UE) vs AMD-V (A9-9420). Both include integrated graphics HD Graphics 3000 (Core i3-2340UE) and Radeon R5 (A9-9420) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i3-2340UE targets Embedded, A9-9420 targets Budget Laptop. Direct competitor: Core i3-2340UE rivals Embedded G-Series; A9-9420 rivals Pentium N4200.

FeatureCore i3-2340UEA9-9420
Integrated GPU
Yes
Yes
IGPU Model
HD Graphics 3000
Radeon R5
Unlocked
No
No
AVX-512
No
No
Virtualization
VT-x, EPT
AMD-V
Target Use
Embedded
Budget Laptop
💰

Value Analysis

The Core i3-2340UE launched at $200 MSRP, while the A9-9420 debuted at $150. At current prices ($200 vs $30), the A9-9420 is $170 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i3-2340UE delivers 7.7 pts/$ vs 51.3 pts/$ for the A9-9420 — making the A9-9420 the 147.6% better value option.

FeatureCore i3-2340UEA9-9420
MSRP
$200
$150-25%
Avg Price (30d)
$200
$30-85%
Performance per Dollar
7.7
51.3+566%
Release Date
2011
2016