Core i3-2340UE vs Turion X2 RM-70

Core i3-2340UE vs Turion X2 RM-70 Performance Spectrum

Core i3-2340UE

2 / 4

1,545

0.0%

1,556

+0.7%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5945WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i3-2340UE vs Turion X2 RM-70 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i3-2340UE vs Turion X2 RM-70: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i3-2340UE

2011

Why buy it

✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with HD Graphics 3000, while Turion X2 RM-70 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (1,545 vs 1,556).
❌Launch MSRP is still $200 MSRP, while Turion X2 RM-70 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌1600% higher power demand at 17W vs 1W.

Turion X2 RM-70

2008

Why buy it

✅Draws 1W instead of 17W, a 16W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌No integrated graphics, while Core i3-2340UE can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Turion X2 RM-70 better than Core i3-2340UE?

Yes. Turion X2 RM-70 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 1.7% average FPS lead across 48 shared CPU game tests in our data and 0.7% better PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Turion X2 RM-70 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 1.7% more average FPS across 48 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Turion X2 RM-70 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.7% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 2 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Turion X2 RM-70 is the easy recommendation for a fresh desktop build. Turion X2 RM-70 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $200 MSRP, and it still gives you a 1.7% average FPS lead across 48 shared CPU game tests in our data. Core i3-2340UE only looks good on raw value math because it is a cheap legacy laptop chip, not because it is a real desktop gaming recommendation. It simply does not keep up in modern games, especially when the gap is already 1.7% in the shared gaming data.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i3-2340UE makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2011 vs 2008). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Core i3-2340UE vs Turion X2 RM-70 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i3-2340UE

The Core i3-2340UE is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 June 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Max frequency: 1.3 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1023. Thermal design power (TDP): 17 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,545 points. Launch price was $250.

Turion X2 RM-70

The Turion X2 RM-70 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Puma (2008−2009) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 2 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: S1. Thermal design power (TDP): 1 MB. Passmark benchmark score: 1,556 points. Launch price was $69.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i3-2340UE packs 2 cores / 4 threads, matching the Turion X2 RM-70's 2 cores. Boost clocks reach 1.3 GHz on the Core i3-2340UE versus 2 GHz on the Turion X2 RM-70 — a 42.4% clock advantage for the Turion X2 RM-70. The Core i3-2340UE uses the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture (32 nm), while the Turion X2 RM-70 uses Puma (2008−2009) (65 nm). In PassMark, the Core i3-2340UE scores 1,545 against the Turion X2 RM-70's 1,556 — a 0.7% lead for the Turion X2 RM-70. L3 cache: 3 MB (total) on the Core i3-2340UE vs 0 kB on the Turion X2 RM-70.

Feature	Core i3-2340UE	Turion X2 RM-70
Cores / Threads	2 / 4	2 / 2
Boost Clock	1.3 GHz	2 GHz+54%
L3 Cache	3 MB (total)	0 kB
L2 Cache	256K (per core)+25500%	1 MB
Process	32 nm-51%	65 nm
Architecture	Sandy Bridge (2011−2013)	Puma (2008−2009)
PassMark	1,545	1,556
Geekbench 6 Single	230	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i3-2340UE uses the BGA1023 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Turion X2 RM-70 uses S1 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Core i3-2340UE	Turion X2 RM-70
Socket	BGA1023	S1
PCIe Generation	PCIe 2.0	PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR3-1333	—
Max RAM Capacity	16 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	Yes	—
PCIe Lanes	16	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x, EPT (Core i3-2340UE) / not specified (Turion X2 RM-70). The Core i3-2340UE includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics 3000), while the Turion X2 RM-70 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i3-2340UE targets Embedded. Direct competitor: Core i3-2340UE rivals Embedded G-Series.