A9-9410 vs Core i3-2340UE

CPU

GPU

A9-9410

2 Cores2 Thrd15 WWMax: 3.5 GHz2016

Similar parts

·······

Buy on Amazon

Core i3-2340UE

2 Cores4 Thrd17 WWMax: 1.3 GHz2011

Similar parts

·······

Buy on Amazon

A9-9410 vs Core i3-2340UE Performance Spectrum

A9-9410

2 / 2

1,550

+0.3%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5945WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Core i3-2340UE

2 / 4

1,545

0.0%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

A9-9410 vs Core i3-2340UE FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

A9-9410 vs Core i3-2340UE: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

A9-9410

2016

Why buy it

✅+52.2% higher Geekbench single-core performance for gaming and desktop responsiveness.
✅Costs $50 less on MSRP ($150 MSRP vs $200 MSRP).
✅Delivers 33.8% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 10.3 vs 7.7 PassMark/$ ($150 MSRP vs $200 MSRP).
✅Draws 15W instead of 17W, a 2W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.

Core i3-2340UE

2011

Why buy it

✅100% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 8) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Lower Geekbench single-core performance for gaming (230 vs 350).
❌Lower PassMark (1,545 vs 1,550).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 7.7 vs 10.3 PassMark/$ ($200 MSRP vs $150 MSRP).

Quick Answers

So, is A9-9410 better than Core i3-2340UE?

Yes. A9-9410 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 1.8% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 0.3% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, A9-9410 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 1.8% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, A9-9410 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.3% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 2 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

A9-9410 is the better buy right now. A9-9410 comes in $50 cheaper on MSRP at $150 MSRP versus $200 MSRP, and it still gives you a 1.8% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 33.8% better value on MSRP (10.3 vs 7.7 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

A9-9410 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2016 vs 2011) and more multi-core headroom with 2 cores / 2 threads instead of 2/4. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

A9-9410 vs Core i3-2340UE Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

A9-9410

The A9-9410 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 31 May 2016 (9 years ago). It is based on the Stoney Ridge (2016−2019) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.9 GHz, with boost up to 3.5 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 2048 kB. Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: FP4. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2133. Passmark benchmark score: 1,550 points. Launch price was $69.

Core i3-2340UE

The Core i3-2340UE is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 June 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Max frequency: 1.3 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1023. Thermal design power (TDP): 17 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,545 points. Launch price was $250.

⚡

Processing Power

The A9-9410 packs 2 cores / 2 threads, matching the Core i3-2340UE's 2 cores. Boost clocks reach 3.5 GHz on the A9-9410 versus 1.3 GHz on the Core i3-2340UE — a 91.7% clock advantage for the A9-9410. The A9-9410 uses the Stoney Ridge (2016−2019) architecture (28 nm), while the Core i3-2340UE uses Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) (32 nm). In PassMark, the A9-9410 scores 1,550 against the Core i3-2340UE's 1,545 — a 0.3% lead for the A9-9410. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 350 vs 230, a 41.4% lead for the A9-9410 that directly translates to higher frame rates. L3 cache: 0 kB on the A9-9410 vs 3 MB (total) on the Core i3-2340UE.

Feature	A9-9410	Core i3-2340UE
Cores / Threads	2 / 2	2 / 4
Boost Clock	3.5 GHz+169%	1.3 GHz
Base Clock	2.9 GHz	—
L3 Cache	0 kB	3 MB (total)
L2 Cache	2048 kB+700%	256K (per core)
Process	28 nm-13%	32 nm
Architecture	Stoney Ridge (2016−2019)	Sandy Bridge (2011−2013)
PassMark	1,550	1,545
Geekbench 6 Single	350+52%	230
Geekbench 6 Multi	650	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The A9-9410 uses the FP4 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core i3-2340UE uses BGA1023 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-2133 on the A9-9410 versus DDR3-1333 on the Core i3-2340UE — the A9-9410 supports 60% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Core i3-2340UE supports up to 16 GB of RAM compared to 8 GB — 100% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 1 (A9-9410) vs 2 (Core i3-2340UE). PCIe lanes: 8 (A9-9410) vs 16 (Core i3-2340UE) — the Core i3-2340UE offers 8 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: SoC (A9-9410) and HM65,QM67 (Core i3-2340UE).

Feature	A9-9410	Core i3-2340UE
Socket	FP4	BGA1023
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0+50%	PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR4-2133+60%	DDR3-1333
Max RAM Capacity	8 GB	16 GB+100%
RAM Channels	1	2+100%
ECC Support	No	Yes
PCIe Lanes	8	16+100%

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: AMD-V (A9-9410) vs VT-x, EPT (Core i3-2340UE). Both include integrated graphics — Radeon R5 (A9-9410) and HD Graphics 3000 (Core i3-2340UE) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: A9-9410 targets Budget Laptop, Core i3-2340UE targets Embedded. Direct competitor: A9-9410 rivals Pentium N4200; Core i3-2340UE rivals Embedded G-Series.

Feature	A9-9410	Core i3-2340UE
Integrated GPU	Yes	Yes
IGPU Model	Radeon R5	HD Graphics 3000
Unlocked	No	No
AVX-512	No	No
Virtualization	AMD-V	VT-x, EPT
Target Use	Budget Laptop	Embedded

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the A9-9410 was priced at $150, while the Core i3-2340UE came in at $200. On launch pricing ($150 vs $200), A9-9410 was $50 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the A9-9410 delivers 10.3 pts/$ vs 7.7 pts/$ for the Core i3-2340UE — making the A9-9410 the 28.9% better value option.

Feature	A9-9410	Core i3-2340UE
MSRP	$150-25%	$200
Performance per Dollar	10.3+34%	7.7
Release Date	2016	2011

Search A9-9410 on Amazon

Search Core i3-2340UE on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.