A9-9410
Core 2 Duo E7300
A9-9410 vs Core 2 Duo E7300 Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
A9-9410 vs Core 2 Duo E7300 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
Valorant
Among Us
Apex Legends
ARC Raiders
Baldur's Gate 3
Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
A9-9410 vs Core 2 Duo E7300: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
A9-9410
2016Why buy it
- ✅Draws 15W instead of 65W, a 50W reduction.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon R5, while Core 2 Duo E7300 needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower Geekbench single-core performance for gaming (350 vs 412).
- ❌Lower Geekbench multi-core (650 vs 725).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 10.3 vs 11.7 PassMark/$ ($150 MSRP vs $133 MSRP).
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core 2 Duo E7300.
Core 2 Duo E7300
2008Why buy it
- ✅+17.7% higher Geekbench single-core performance for gaming and desktop responsiveness.
- ✅Costs $17 less on MSRP ($133 MSRP vs $150 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 13.1% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 11.7 vs 10.3 PassMark/$ ($133 MSRP vs $150 MSRP).
- ✅100% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 8) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Stock), unlike A9-9410.
Trade-offs
- ❌333.3% higher power demand at 65W vs 15W.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while A9-9410 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Quick Answers
So, is Core 2 Duo E7300 better than A9-9410?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
A9-9410 vs Core 2 Duo E7300 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
A9-9410
The A9-9410 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 31 May 2016 (9 years ago). It is based on the Stoney Ridge (2016−2019) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.9 GHz, with boost up to 3.5 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 2048 kB. Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: FP4. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2133. Passmark benchmark score: 1,550 points. Launch price was $69.
Core 2 Duo E7300
The Core 2 Duo E7300 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2008-01-01. It is based on the Wolfdale (2008−2010) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.66 GHz, with boost up to 2.67 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 3 MB (total). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: LGA775. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR1, DDR2, DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,555 points. Launch price was $249.
Processing Power
Both the A9-9410 and Core 2 Duo E7300 share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 3.5 GHz on the A9-9410 versus 2.67 GHz on the Core 2 Duo E7300 — a 26.9% clock advantage for the A9-9410 (base: 2.9 GHz vs 2.66 GHz). The A9-9410 uses the Stoney Ridge (2016−2019) architecture (28 nm), while the Core 2 Duo E7300 uses Wolfdale (2008−2010) (45 nm). In PassMark, the A9-9410 scores 1,550 against the Core 2 Duo E7300's 1,555 — a 0.3% lead for the Core 2 Duo E7300. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 350 vs 412, a 16.3% lead for the Core 2 Duo E7300 that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 650 vs 725 (10.9% advantage for the Core 2 Duo E7300). Both processors carry 0 kB of L3 cache.
| Feature | A9-9410 | Core 2 Duo E7300 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 2 / 2 | 2 / 2 |
| Boost Clock | 3.5 GHz+31% | 2.67 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2.9 GHz+9% | 2.66 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 0 kB | 0 kB |
| L2 Cache | 2048 kB | 3 MB (total)+50% |
| Process | 28 nm-38% | 45 nm |
| Architecture | Stoney Ridge (2016−2019) | Wolfdale (2008−2010) |
| PassMark | 1,550 | 1,555 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 350 | 412+18% |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 650 | 725+12% |
Memory & Platform
The A9-9410 uses the FP4 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core 2 Duo E7300 uses LGA775 (PCIe 1.1) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-2133 on the A9-9410 versus DDR2-800 on the Core 2 Duo E7300 — the A9-9410 supports 166.6% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. Both support up to 8 GB of RAM. Memory channels: 1 (A9-9410) vs 2 (Core 2 Duo E7300). PCIe lanes: 8 (A9-9410) vs 16 (Core 2 Duo E7300) — the Core 2 Duo E7300 offers 8 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: SoC (A9-9410) and P35,G33,G41,P45 (Core 2 Duo E7300).
| Feature | A9-9410 | Core 2 Duo E7300 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FP4 | LGA775 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0+173% | PCIe 1.1 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-2133+167% | DDR2-800 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| RAM Channels | 1 | 2+100% |
| ECC Support | No | No |
| PCIe Lanes | 8 | 16+100% |
Advanced Features
Only the Core 2 Duo E7300 has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Virtualization support: AMD-V (A9-9410) vs VT-x (Core 2 Duo E7300). The A9-9410 includes integrated graphics (Radeon R5), while the Core 2 Duo E7300 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: A9-9410 targets Budget Laptop, Core 2 Duo E7300 targets Legacy Desktop. Direct competitor: A9-9410 rivals Pentium N4200; Core 2 Duo E7300 rivals Athlon II X2 245.
| Feature | A9-9410 | Core 2 Duo E7300 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | No |
| IGPU Model | Radeon R5 | None |
| Unlocked | No | Yes |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | AMD-V | VT-x |
| Target Use | Budget Laptop | Legacy Desktop |
Value Analysis
At launch, the A9-9410 was priced at $150, while the Core 2 Duo E7300 came in at $133. On launch pricing ($150 vs $133), Core 2 Duo E7300 was $17 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the A9-9410 delivers 10.3 pts/$ vs 11.7 pts/$ for the Core 2 Duo E7300 — making the Core 2 Duo E7300 the 12.3% better value option.
| Feature | A9-9410 | Core 2 Duo E7300 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $150 | $133-11% |
| Performance per Dollar | 10.3 | 11.7+14% |
| Release Date | 2016 | 2008 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on A9-9410 and Core 2 Duo E7300
