A9-9410
VS
Athlon II X3 420e

A9-9410 vs Athlon II X3 420e

AMD

A9-9410

2 Cores2 Thrd15 WWMax: 3.5 GHz2016
VS
AMD

Athlon II X3 420e

3 Cores3 Thrd45 WWMax: 2.6 GHz2010

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The A9-9410 is positioned at rank 1071 and the Athlon II X3 420e is on rank 906, so the Athlon II X3 420e offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar A9-9410

#1059
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
2840%
#1060
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
2799%
#1061
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
2569%
#1062
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
2558%
#1063
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
2534%
#1065
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
2447%
#1066
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
2347%
#1067
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
2343%
#1068
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
2280%
#1071
A9-9410
MSRP: $150|Avg: $25
100%
#1073
A8 Pro-7150B
MSRP: $150|Avg: $20
99%
#1074
A9-9420
MSRP: $150|Avg: $30
99%
#1076
Celeron B730
MSRP: $70|Avg: $10
99%
#1078
A9-9425
MSRP: $150|Avg: $30
98%
#1080
Core i5-4402E
MSRP: $266|Avg: $100
98%
#1082
A6-7000
MSRP: $100|Avg: $15
97%
#1083
Core i5-2520M
MSRP: $225|Avg: N/A
96%
#1084
Core i7-2710QE
MSRP: $378|Avg: $40
96%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Athlon II X3 420e

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
21424%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
20243%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
14698%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
4428%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
3507%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
3068%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
1757%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
1734%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
1579%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
1579%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
1561%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
1519%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
1498%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
1492%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
1478%
#395
Ryzen Threadripper 3970X
MSRP: $4491|Avg: $4491
96%
#906
Athlon II X3 420e
MSRP: $107|Avg: $15
100%
#908
Celeron E1500
MSRP: $53|Avg: $5
99%
#909
Pentium G6950
MSRP: $87|Avg: $25
99%
#910
Pentium J4205
MSRP: $161|Avg: $161
99%
#911
Core i3-2120
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
99%
#912
Pentium E6600
MSRP: $84|Avg: $50
98%
#913
Pentium E5500
MSRP: $75|Avg: $25
98%
#914
Pentium G3460
MSRP: $149|Avg: $25
98%
#915
Pentium E6700
MSRP: $86|Avg: $5
97%
#916
Phenom II X4 820
MSRP: $150|Avg: $50
97%
#917
Core i7-3930K
MSRP: $583|Avg: $150
97%
#919
Sempron LE-1250
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $20
96%
#920
Core i7-4930K
MSRP: $670|Avg: $100
96%
#921
Pentium E6500
MSRP: $84|Avg: $10
96%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Generational Difference: This comparison involves processors from different technological eras. The A9-9410 (2016) utilizes 28 nm technology and DDR4-2133, providing a fundamental performance advantage.
InsightA9-9410Athlon II X3 420e
Gaming
Superior gaming performance
Lower gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
⚠️ Higher cost ($25)
More affordable ($15)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Stoney Ridge (2016−2019) / 28 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Rana (2009−2011) / 45 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Athlon II X3 420e (2010) relies on 45 nm technology and DDR3, placing it in a different performance category relative to modern standards.
InsightA9-9410Athlon II X3 420e
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Better overall value (+67%)
Upfront Cost
⚠️ Higher cost ($25)
More affordable ($15)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of A9-9410 and Athlon II X3 420e

AMD

A9-9410

The A9-9410 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 31 May 2016 (9 years ago). It is based on the Stoney Ridge (2016−2019) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.9 GHz, with boost up to 3.5 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 2048 kB. Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: FP4. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2133. Passmark benchmark score: 1,550 points. Launch price was $69.

AMD

Athlon II X3 420e

The Athlon II X3 420e is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 21 September 2010 (15 years ago). It is based on the Rana (2009−2011) architecture. It features 3 cores and 3 threads. Base frequency is 2.6 GHz, with boost up to 2.6 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: AM3. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,557 points. Launch price was $116.

Processing Power

The A9-9410 packs 2 cores / 2 threads, while the Athlon II X3 420e offers 3 cores / 3 threads — the Athlon II X3 420e has 1 more core. Boost clocks reach 3.5 GHz on the A9-9410 versus 2.6 GHz on the Athlon II X3 420e — a 29.5% clock advantage for the A9-9410 (base: 2.9 GHz vs 2.6 GHz). The A9-9410 uses the Stoney Ridge (2016−2019) architecture (28 nm), while the Athlon II X3 420e uses Rana (2009−2011) (45 nm). In PassMark, the A9-9410 scores 1,550 against the Athlon II X3 420e's 1,557 — a 0.5% lead for the Athlon II X3 420e. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 350 vs 314, a 10.8% lead for the A9-9410 that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 650 vs 880 (30.1% advantage for the Athlon II X3 420e). Both processors carry 0 kB of L3 cache.

FeatureA9-9410Athlon II X3 420e
Cores / Threads
2 / 2
3 / 3+50%
Boost Clock
3.5 GHz+35%
2.6 GHz
Base Clock
2.9 GHz+12%
2.6 GHz
L3 Cache
0 kB
0 kB
L2 Cache
2048 kB+300%
512 kB (per core)
Process
28 nm-38%
45 nm
Architecture
Stoney Ridge (2016−2019)
Rana (2009−2011)
PassMark
1,550
1,557
Geekbench 6 Single
350+11%
314
Geekbench 6 Multi
650
880+35%
🧠

Memory & Platform

The A9-9410 uses the FP4 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Athlon II X3 420e uses AM3 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-2133 on the A9-9410 versus DDR3-1333 on the Athlon II X3 420e — the A9-9410 supports 28.6% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Athlon II X3 420e supports up to 16 GB of RAM compared to 8 GB 66.7% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 1 (A9-9410) vs 2 (Athlon II X3 420e). PCIe lanes: 8 (A9-9410) vs 16 (Athlon II X3 420e) — the Athlon II X3 420e offers 8 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: SoC (A9-9410) and 760G,785G,880G (Athlon II X3 420e).

FeatureA9-9410Athlon II X3 420e
Socket
FP4
AM3
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0+50%
PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR4-2133+33%
DDR3-1333
Max RAM Capacity
8 GB
16 GB+100%
RAM Channels
1
2+100%
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
8
16+100%
🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Both support AMD-V virtualization. The A9-9410 includes integrated graphics (Radeon R5), while the Athlon II X3 420e requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: A9-9410 targets Budget Laptop, Athlon II X3 420e targets Legacy Desktop. Direct competitor: A9-9410 rivals Pentium N4200; Athlon II X3 420e rivals Athlon II X3 415e.

FeatureA9-9410Athlon II X3 420e
Integrated GPU
Yes
No
IGPU Model
Radeon R5
Unlocked
No
No
AVX-512
No
No
Virtualization
AMD-V
AMD-V
Target Use
Budget Laptop
Legacy Desktop
💰

Value Analysis

The A9-9410 launched at $150 MSRP, while the Athlon II X3 420e debuted at $107. At current prices ($25 vs $15), the Athlon II X3 420e is $10 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the A9-9410 delivers 62.0 pts/$ vs 103.8 pts/$ for the Athlon II X3 420e — making the Athlon II X3 420e the 50.4% better value option.

FeatureA9-9410Athlon II X3 420e
MSRP
$150
$107-29%
Avg Price (30d)
$25
$15-40%
Performance per Dollar
62.0
103.8+67%
Release Date
2016
2010