A9-9410 vs Core i5-4200Y

A9-9410 vs Core i5-4200Y Performance Spectrum

A9-9410

2 / 2

1,550

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5945WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Core i5-4200Y

2 / 4

1,558

+0.5%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

A9-9410 vs Core i5-4200Y FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

A9-9410 vs Core i5-4200Y: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

A9-9410

2016

Why buy it

✅Draws 15W instead of 512W, a 497W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower Geekbench single-core performance for gaming (350 vs 574).
❌Lower PassMark (1,550 vs 1,558).
❌Launch MSRP is still $150 MSRP, while Core i5-4200Y mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.

Core i5-4200Y

2013

Why buy it

✅+64% higher Geekbench single-core performance for gaming and desktop responsiveness.
✅50% more PCIe lanes (12 vs 8) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌3313.3% higher power demand at 512W vs 15W.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i5-4200Y better than A9-9410?

Yes. Core i5-4200Y is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 1.8% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data and 0.5% better PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Core i5-4200Y is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 1.8% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i5-4200Y is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.5% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i5-4200Y is the easy recommendation for a fresh desktop build. Core i5-4200Y comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $150 MSRP, and it still gives you a 1.8% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. A9-9410 only looks good on raw value math because it is a cheap legacy laptop chip, not because it is a real desktop gaming recommendation. It simply does not keep up in modern games.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

A9-9410 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2016 vs 2013). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

A9-9410 vs Core i5-4200Y Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

A9-9410

The A9-9410 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 31 May 2016 (9 years ago). It is based on the Stoney Ridge (2016−2019) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.9 GHz, with boost up to 3.5 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 2048 kB. Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: FP4. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2133. Passmark benchmark score: 1,550 points. Launch price was $69.

Core i5-4200Y

The Core i5-4200Y is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 June 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.4 GHz, with boost up to 1.9 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1168. Thermal design power (TDP): 11.5 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,558 points. Launch price was $297.

⚡

Processing Power

The A9-9410 packs 2 cores / 2 threads, matching the Core i5-4200Y's 2 cores. Boost clocks reach 3.5 GHz on the A9-9410 versus 1.9 GHz on the Core i5-4200Y — a 59.3% clock advantage for the A9-9410 (base: 2.9 GHz vs 1.4 GHz). The A9-9410 uses the Stoney Ridge (2016−2019) architecture (28 nm), while the Core i5-4200Y uses Haswell (2013−2015) (22 nm). In PassMark, the A9-9410 scores 1,550 against the Core i5-4200Y's 1,558 — a 0.5% lead for the Core i5-4200Y. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 350 vs 574, a 48.5% lead for the Core i5-4200Y that directly translates to higher frame rates. L3 cache: 0 kB on the A9-9410 vs 3 MB (total) on the Core i5-4200Y.

Feature	A9-9410	Core i5-4200Y
Cores / Threads	2 / 2	2 / 4
Boost Clock	3.5 GHz+84%	1.9 GHz
Base Clock	2.9 GHz+107%	1.4 GHz
L3 Cache	0 kB	3 MB (total)
L2 Cache	2048 kB+700%	256K (per core)
Process	28 nm	22 nm-21%
Architecture	Stoney Ridge (2016−2019)	Haswell (2013−2015)
PassMark	1,550	1,558
Geekbench 6 Single	350	574+64%
Geekbench 6 Multi	650	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The A9-9410 uses the FP4 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core i5-4200Y uses FCBGA1168 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-2133 on the A9-9410 versus DDR3L-1600 on the Core i5-4200Y — the A9-9410 supports 33.3% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Core i5-4200Y supports up to 16 GB of RAM compared to 8 GB — 100% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 1 (A9-9410) vs 2 (Core i5-4200Y). PCIe lanes: 8 (A9-9410) vs 12 (Core i5-4200Y) — the Core i5-4200Y offers 4 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: SoC (A9-9410) and HM86,HM87,QM87 (Core i5-4200Y).

Feature	A9-9410	Core i5-4200Y
Socket	FP4	FCBGA1168
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR4-2133+33%	DDR3L-1600
Max RAM Capacity	8 GB	16 GB+100%
RAM Channels	1	2+100%
ECC Support	No	No
PCIe Lanes	8	12+50%

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: AMD-V (A9-9410) vs VT-x, EPT (Core i5-4200Y). Both include integrated graphics — Radeon R5 (A9-9410) and HD Graphics 4200 (Core i5-4200Y) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: A9-9410 targets Budget Laptop, Core i5-4200Y targets Tablet/2-in-1. Direct competitor: A9-9410 rivals Pentium N4200; Core i5-4200Y rivals A4-5150M.