PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Celeron J4005 vs Core i3-2340UE FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Celeron J4005 vs Core i3-2340UE: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Celeron J4005

2017

Why buy it

✅+95.7% higher Geekbench single-core performance for gaming and desktop responsiveness.
✅+33.3% larger total L3 cache (4 MB vs 3 MB).
✅Draws 10W instead of 17W, a 7W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (1,543 vs 1,545).

Core i3-2340UE

2011

Why buy it

✅+0.1% higher PassMark.
✅166.7% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 6) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Lower Geekbench single-core performance for gaming (230 vs 450).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (3 MB vs 4 MB).
❌Launch MSRP is still $200 MSRP, while Celeron J4005 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌70% higher power demand at 17W vs 10W.

Quick Answers

So, is Celeron J4005 better than Core i3-2340UE?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Celeron J4005 is ahead with a 0.5% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Core i3-2340UE pulls ahead with 0.1% better PassMark. Celeron J4005 also has the bigger cache pool with 33.3% larger total L3 cache (4 MB vs 3 MB).

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i3-2340UE is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.1% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Celeron J4005 is the easy recommendation for a fresh desktop build. Celeron J4005 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $200 MSRP, and it still gives you a 0.5% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Core i3-2340UE only looks good on raw value math because it is a cheap legacy laptop chip, not because it is a real desktop gaming recommendation. It simply does not keep up in modern games.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Celeron J4005 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2017 vs 2011) and 33.3% larger total L3 cache (4 MB vs 3 MB). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Celeron J4005 vs Core i3-2340UE Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Celeron J4005

The Celeron J4005 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 11 December 2017 (7 years ago). It is based on the Goldmont Plus (2017) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 2.7 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB. L2 cache: 4 MB (total). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1090. Thermal design power (TDP): 10 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 1,543 points. Launch price was $107.

Core i3-2340UE

The Core i3-2340UE is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 June 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Max frequency: 1.3 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1023. Thermal design power (TDP): 17 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,545 points. Launch price was $250.

⚡

Processing Power

The Celeron J4005 packs 2 cores / 2 threads, matching the Core i3-2340UE's 2 cores. Boost clocks reach 2.7 GHz on the Celeron J4005 versus 1.3 GHz on the Core i3-2340UE — a 70% clock advantage for the Celeron J4005. The Celeron J4005 uses the Goldmont Plus (2017) architecture (14 nm), while the Core i3-2340UE uses Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron J4005 scores 1,543 against the Core i3-2340UE's 1,545 — a 0.1% lead for the Core i3-2340UE. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 450 vs 230, a 64.7% lead for the Celeron J4005 that directly translates to higher frame rates. L3 cache: 4 MB on the Celeron J4005 vs 3 MB (total) on the Core i3-2340UE.

Feature	Celeron J4005	Core i3-2340UE
Cores / Threads	2 / 2	2 / 4
Boost Clock	2.7 GHz+108%	1.3 GHz
Base Clock	2 GHz	—
L3 Cache	4 MB+33%	3 MB (total)
L2 Cache	4 MB (total)	256K (per core)+6300%
Process	14 nm-56%	32 nm
Architecture	Goldmont Plus (2017)	Sandy Bridge (2011−2013)
PassMark	1,543	1,545
Geekbench 6 Single	450+96%	230
Geekbench 6 Multi	800	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron J4005 uses the FCBGA1090 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core i3-2340UE uses BGA1023 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-2400 on the Celeron J4005 versus DDR3-1333 on the Core i3-2340UE — the Celeron J4005 supports 80% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Core i3-2340UE supports up to 16 GB of RAM compared to 8 GB — 100% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 6 (Celeron J4005) vs 16 (Core i3-2340UE) — the Core i3-2340UE offers 10 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: SoC (Celeron J4005) and HM65,QM67 (Core i3-2340UE).

Feature	Celeron J4005	Core i3-2340UE
Socket	FCBGA1090	BGA1023
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0+50%	PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR4-2400+80%	DDR3-1333
Max RAM Capacity	8 GB	16 GB+100%
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	No	Yes
PCIe Lanes	6	16+167%

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Celeron J4005) vs VT-x, EPT (Core i3-2340UE). Both include integrated graphics — Intel UHD Graphics 600 (Celeron J4005) and HD Graphics 3000 (Core i3-2340UE) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron J4005 targets Entry Level Desktop, Core i3-2340UE targets Embedded. Direct competitor: Celeron J4005 rivals Ryzen Embedded R1102G; Core i3-2340UE rivals Embedded G-Series.

Feature	Celeron J4005	Core i3-2340UE
Integrated GPU	Yes	Yes
IGPU Model	Intel UHD Graphics 600	HD Graphics 3000
Unlocked	No	No
AVX-512	No	No
Virtualization	VT-x, VT-d, EPT	VT-x, EPT
Target Use	Entry Level Desktop	Embedded