A9-9410
Celeron J4005
A9-9410 vs Celeron J4005 Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
A9-9410 vs Celeron J4005 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
Valorant
Among Us
Apex Legends
ARC Raiders
Baldur's Gate 3
Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
A9-9410 vs Celeron J4005: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
A9-9410
2016Why buy it
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower Geekbench single-core performance for gaming (350 vs 450).
- ❌Lower Geekbench multi-core (650 vs 800).
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $150 MSRP, while Celeron J4005 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌50% higher power demand at 15W vs 10W.
Celeron J4005
2017Why buy it
- ✅+28.6% higher Geekbench single-core performance for gaming and desktop responsiveness.
- ✅Draws 10W instead of 15W, a 5W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.
Quick Answers
So, is Celeron J4005 better than A9-9410?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
A9-9410 vs Celeron J4005 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
A9-9410
The A9-9410 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 31 May 2016 (9 years ago). It is based on the Stoney Ridge (2016−2019) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.9 GHz, with boost up to 3.5 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 2048 kB. Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: FP4. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2133. Passmark benchmark score: 1,550 points. Launch price was $69.
Celeron J4005
The Celeron J4005 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 11 December 2017 (7 years ago). It is based on the Goldmont Plus (2017) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 2.7 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB. L2 cache: 4 MB (total). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1090. Thermal design power (TDP): 10 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 1,543 points. Launch price was $107.
Processing Power
Both the A9-9410 and Celeron J4005 share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 3.5 GHz on the A9-9410 versus 2.7 GHz on the Celeron J4005 — a 25.8% clock advantage for the A9-9410 (base: 2.9 GHz vs 2 GHz). The A9-9410 uses the Stoney Ridge (2016−2019) architecture (28 nm), while the Celeron J4005 uses Goldmont Plus (2017) (14 nm). In PassMark, the A9-9410 scores 1,550 against the Celeron J4005's 1,543 — a 0.5% lead for the A9-9410. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 350 vs 450, a 25% lead for the Celeron J4005 that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 650 vs 800 (20.7% advantage for the Celeron J4005). L3 cache: 0 kB on the A9-9410 vs 4 MB on the Celeron J4005.
| Feature | A9-9410 | Celeron J4005 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 2 / 2 | 2 / 2 |
| Boost Clock | 3.5 GHz+30% | 2.7 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2.9 GHz+45% | 2 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 0 kB | 4 MB |
| L2 Cache | 2048 kB | 4 MB (total)+100% |
| Process | 28 nm | 14 nm-50% |
| Architecture | Stoney Ridge (2016−2019) | Goldmont Plus (2017) |
| PassMark | 1,550 | 1,543 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 350 | 450+29% |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 650 | 800+23% |
Memory & Platform
The A9-9410 uses the FP4 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Celeron J4005 uses FCBGA1090 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-2133 on the A9-9410 versus DDR4-2400 on the Celeron J4005 — the Celeron J4005 supports 12.5% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. Both support up to 8 GB of RAM. Memory channels: 1 (A9-9410) vs 2 (Celeron J4005). PCIe lanes: 8 (A9-9410) vs 6 (Celeron J4005) — the A9-9410 offers 2 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: SoC (A9-9410) and SoC (Celeron J4005).
| Feature | A9-9410 | Celeron J4005 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FP4 | FCBGA1090 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-2133 | DDR4-2400+13% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| RAM Channels | 1 | 2+100% |
| ECC Support | No | No |
| PCIe Lanes | 8+33% | 6 |
Advanced Features
Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: AMD-V (A9-9410) vs VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Celeron J4005). Both include integrated graphics — Radeon R5 (A9-9410) and Intel UHD Graphics 600 (Celeron J4005) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: A9-9410 targets Budget Laptop, Celeron J4005 targets Entry Level Desktop. Direct competitor: A9-9410 rivals Pentium N4200; Celeron J4005 rivals Ryzen Embedded R1102G.
| Feature | A9-9410 | Celeron J4005 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | Yes |
| IGPU Model | Radeon R5 | Intel UHD Graphics 600 |
| Unlocked | No | No |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | AMD-V | VT-x, VT-d, EPT |
| Target Use | Budget Laptop | Entry Level Desktop |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on A9-9410 and Celeron J4005
