Celeron J4005 vs Core Duo T2250

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Celeron J4005 vs Core Duo T2250 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Celeron J4005 vs Core Duo T2250: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Celeron J4005

2017

Why buy it

✅100+% more PCIe lanes (6 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel UHD Graphics 600, while Core Duo T2250 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌400% higher power demand at 10W vs 2W.

Core Duo T2250

2006

Why buy it

✅Draws 2W instead of 10W, a 8W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (1,537 vs 1,543).
❌No integrated graphics, while Celeron J4005 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Celeron J4005 better than Core Duo T2250?

Yes. Celeron J4005 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 0.4% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 0.4% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Celeron J4005 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 0.4% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Celeron J4005 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.4% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 2 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Celeron J4005 still makes the most sense overall. Celeron J4005 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 0.4% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Celeron J4005 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2017 vs 2006) and more multi-core headroom with 2 cores / 2 threads instead of 2/2. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Celeron J4005 vs Core Duo T2250 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Celeron J4005

The Celeron J4005 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 11 December 2017 (7 years ago). It is based on the Goldmont Plus (2017) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 2.7 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB. L2 cache: 4 MB (total). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1090. Thermal design power (TDP): 10 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 1,543 points. Launch price was $107.

Core Duo T2250

The Core Duo T2250 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2008-01-01. It is based on the Yonah (2005−2006) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.73 GHz, with boost up to 1.7 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: PGA478. Thermal design power (TDP): 31 Watt. Memory support: DDR1. Passmark benchmark score: 1,537 points. Launch price was $249.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Celeron J4005 and Core Duo T2250 share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 2.7 GHz on the Celeron J4005 versus 1.7 GHz on the Core Duo T2250 — a 45.5% clock advantage for the Celeron J4005 (base: 2 GHz vs 1.73 GHz). The Celeron J4005 uses the Goldmont Plus (2017) architecture (14 nm), while the Core Duo T2250 uses Yonah (2005−2006) (65 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron J4005 scores 1,543 against the Core Duo T2250's 1,537 — a 0.4% lead for the Celeron J4005. L3 cache: 4 MB on the Celeron J4005 vs 0 kB on the Core Duo T2250.

Feature	Celeron J4005	Core Duo T2250
Cores / Threads	2 / 2	2 / 2
Boost Clock	2.7 GHz+59%	1.7 GHz
Base Clock	2 GHz+16%	1.73 GHz
L3 Cache	4 MB	0 kB
L2 Cache	4 MB (total)+100%	2 MB
Process	14 nm-78%	65 nm
Architecture	Goldmont Plus (2017)	Yonah (2005−2006)
PassMark	1,543	1,537
Geekbench 6 Single	450	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	800	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron J4005 uses the FCBGA1090 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core Duo T2250 uses PGA478 (PCIe 1.1) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Celeron J4005	Core Duo T2250
Socket	FCBGA1090	PGA478
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0+173%	PCIe 1.1
Max RAM Speed	DDR4-2400	—
Max RAM Capacity	8 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	No	—
PCIe Lanes	6	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Celeron J4005) / not specified (Core Duo T2250). The Celeron J4005 includes integrated graphics (Intel UHD Graphics 600), while the Core Duo T2250 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron J4005 targets Entry Level Desktop. Direct competitor: Celeron J4005 rivals Ryzen Embedded R1102G.