
A10-6790B

Celeron J4005
A10-6790B vs Celeron J4005 Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
A10-6790B vs Celeron J4005 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
A10-6790B vs Celeron J4005: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
A10-6790B
2013Why buy it
- β Better for gaming: +3.4% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- β 166.7% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 6) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- β Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Celeron J4005.
Trade-offs
- βLaunch MSRP is still $122 MSRP, while Celeron J4005 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- β900% higher power demand at 100W vs 10W.
Celeron J4005
2017Why buy it
- β Draws 10W instead of 100W, a 90W reduction.
Trade-offs
- βWorse for gaming: lower average FPS than A10-6790B across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- βLower PassMark (1,543 vs 1,546).
- βNo boxed cooler included, unlike A10-6790B.
Quick Answers
So, is A10-6790B better than Celeron J4005?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
A10-6790B vs Celeron J4005 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

A10-6790B
The A10-6790B is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Richland (2013β2014) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 4 GHz, with boost up to 4.3 GHz. L2 cache: 4096 kB. Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: FM2. Thermal design power (TDP): 100 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-1866. Passmark benchmark score: 1,546 points. Launch price was $130.

Celeron J4005
The Celeron J4005 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 11 December 2017 (7 years ago). It is based on the Goldmont Plus (2017) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 2.7 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB. L2 cache: 4 MB (total). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1090. Thermal design power (TDP): 10 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 1,543 points. Launch price was $107.
Processing Power
The A10-6790B packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Celeron J4005 offers 2 cores / 2 threads β the A10-6790B has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.3 GHz on the A10-6790B versus 2.7 GHz on the Celeron J4005 β a 45.7% clock advantage for the A10-6790B (base: 4 GHz vs 2 GHz). The A10-6790B uses the Richland (2013β2014) architecture (32 nm), while the Celeron J4005 uses Goldmont Plus (2017) (14 nm). In PassMark, the A10-6790B scores 1,546 against the Celeron J4005's 1,543 β a 0.2% lead for the A10-6790B.
| Feature | A10-6790B | Celeron J4005 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 4 / 4+100% | 2 / 2 |
| Boost Clock | 4.3 GHz+59% | 2.7 GHz |
| Base Clock | 4 GHz+100% | 2 GHz |
| L3 Cache | β | 4 MB |
| L2 Cache | 4096 kB | 4 MB (total) |
| Process | 32 nm | 14 nm-56% |
| Architecture | Richland (2013β2014) | Goldmont Plus (2017) |
| PassMark | 1,546 | 1,543 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | β | 450 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | β | 800 |
Memory & Platform
The A10-6790B uses the FM2 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Celeron J4005 uses FCBGA1090 (PCIe 3.0) β making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3-1866 on the A10-6790B versus DDR4-2400 on the Celeron J4005 β the Celeron J4005 supports 28.6% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The A10-6790B supports up to 32 GB of RAM compared to 8 GB β 300% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 16 (A10-6790B) vs 6 (Celeron J4005) β the A10-6790B offers 10 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: A55,A75,A85X,A78,A88X (A10-6790B) and SoC (Celeron J4005).
| Feature | A10-6790B | Celeron J4005 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FM2 | FCBGA1090 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR3-1866 | DDR4-2400+29% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 32 GB+300% | 8 GB |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | No | No |
| PCIe Lanes | 16+167% | 6 |
Advanced Features
Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: AMD-V (A10-6790B) vs VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Celeron J4005). Both include integrated graphics β Radeon HD 8670D (A10-6790B) and Intel UHD Graphics 600 (Celeron J4005) β useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: A10-6790B targets Office, Celeron J4005 targets Entry Level Desktop. Direct competitor: A10-6790B rivals Core i3-4330; Celeron J4005 rivals Ryzen Embedded R1102G.
| Feature | A10-6790B | Celeron J4005 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | Yes |
| IGPU Model | Radeon HD 8670D | Intel UHD Graphics 600 |
| Unlocked | No | No |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | AMD-V | VT-x, VT-d, EPT |
| Target Use | Office | Entry Level Desktop |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.















