
A10-6790B

Core i3-540
A10-6790B vs Core i3-540 Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
A10-6790B vs Core i3-540 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
A10-6790B vs Core i3-540: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
A10-6790B
2013Why buy it
- ✅Costs $11 less on MSRP ($122 MSRP vs $133 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 8.5% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 12.7 vs 11.7 PassMark/$ ($122 MSRP vs $133 MSRP).
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon HD 8670D, while Core i3-540 needs a discrete GPU.
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Core i3-540.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (1,546 vs 1,554).
- ❌37% higher power demand at 100W vs 73W.
Core i3-540
2010Why buy it
- ✅+0.5% higher PassMark.
- ✅Draws 73W instead of 100W, a 27W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 11.7 vs 12.7 PassMark/$ ($133 MSRP vs $122 MSRP).
- ❌No integrated graphics, while A10-6790B can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike A10-6790B.
Quick Answers
So, is A10-6790B better than Core i3-540?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
A10-6790B vs Core i3-540 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

A10-6790B
The A10-6790B is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Richland (2013−2014) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 4 GHz, with boost up to 4.3 GHz. L2 cache: 4096 kB. Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: FM2. Thermal design power (TDP): 100 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-1866. Passmark benchmark score: 1,546 points. Launch price was $130.

Core i3-540
The Core i3-540 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 7 January 2010 (15 years ago). It is based on the Clarkdale (2010−2011) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.06 GHz, with boost up to 0.07 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1156. Thermal design power (TDP): 73 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,554 points. Launch price was $45.
Processing Power
The A10-6790B packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Core i3-540 offers 2 cores / 4 threads — the A10-6790B has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.3 GHz on the A10-6790B versus 0.07 GHz on the Core i3-540 — a 193.6% clock advantage for the A10-6790B (base: 4 GHz vs 3.06 GHz). The A10-6790B uses the Richland (2013−2014) architecture (32 nm), while the Core i3-540 uses Clarkdale (2010−2011) (32 nm). In PassMark, the A10-6790B scores 1,546 against the Core i3-540's 1,554 — a 0.5% lead for the Core i3-540.
| Feature | A10-6790B | Core i3-540 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 4 / 4+100% | 2 / 4 |
| Boost Clock | 4.3 GHz+6043% | 0.07 GHz |
| Base Clock | 4 GHz+31% | 3.06 GHz |
| L3 Cache | — | 4 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 4096 kB+1500% | 256 kB (per core) |
| Process | 32 nm | 32 nm |
| Architecture | Richland (2013−2014) | Clarkdale (2010−2011) |
| PassMark | 1,546 | 1,554 |
Memory & Platform
The A10-6790B uses the FM2 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core i3-540 uses LGA1156 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | A10-6790B | Core i3-540 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FM2 | LGA1156 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0+50% | PCIe 2.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR3-1866 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 32 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | No | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 16 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: AMD-V (A10-6790B) / not specified (Core i3-540). The A10-6790B includes integrated graphics (Radeon HD 8670D), while the Core i3-540 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: A10-6790B targets Office. Direct competitor: A10-6790B rivals Core i3-4330.
| Feature | A10-6790B | Core i3-540 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | — |
| IGPU Model | Radeon HD 8670D | — |
| Unlocked | No | — |
| AVX-512 | No | — |
| Virtualization | AMD-V | — |
| Target Use | Office | — |
Value Analysis
At launch, the A10-6790B was priced at $122, while the Core i3-540 came in at $133. On launch pricing ($122 vs $133), A10-6790B was $11 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the A10-6790B delivers 12.7 pts/$ vs 11.7 pts/$ for the Core i3-540 — making the A10-6790B the 8.1% better value option.
| Feature | A10-6790B | Core i3-540 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $122-8% | $133 |
| Performance per Dollar | 12.7+9% | 11.7 |
| Release Date | 2013 | 2010 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
















