
A10-6790B

Core 2 Duo E7300
A10-6790B vs Core 2 Duo E7300 Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
A10-6790B vs Core 2 Duo E7300 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
A10-6790B vs Core 2 Duo E7300: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
A10-6790B
2013Why buy it
- β Costs $11 less on MSRP ($122 MSRP vs $133 MSRP).
- β Delivers 8.4% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 12.7 vs 11.7 PassMark/$ ($122 MSRP vs $133 MSRP).
- β Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon HD 8670D, while Core 2 Duo E7300 needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- βLower PassMark (1,546 vs 1,555).
- β53.8% higher power demand at 100W vs 65W.
Core 2 Duo E7300
2008Why buy it
- β +0.6% higher PassMark.
- β Draws 65W instead of 100W, a 35W reduction.
Trade-offs
- βLower PassMark per dollar, at 11.7 vs 12.7 PassMark/$ ($133 MSRP vs $122 MSRP).
- βNo integrated graphics, while A10-6790B can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Quick Answers
So, is A10-6790B better than Core 2 Duo E7300?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
A10-6790B vs Core 2 Duo E7300 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

A10-6790B
The A10-6790B is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Richland (2013β2014) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 4 GHz, with boost up to 4.3 GHz. L2 cache: 4096 kB. Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: FM2. Thermal design power (TDP): 100 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-1866. Passmark benchmark score: 1,546 points. Launch price was $130.

Core 2 Duo E7300
The Core 2 Duo E7300 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2008-01-01. It is based on the Wolfdale (2008β2010) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.66 GHz, with boost up to 2.67 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 3 MB (total). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: LGA775. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR1, DDR2, DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,555 points. Launch price was $249.
Processing Power
The A10-6790B packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Core 2 Duo E7300 offers 2 cores / 2 threads β the A10-6790B has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.3 GHz on the A10-6790B versus 2.67 GHz on the Core 2 Duo E7300 β a 46.8% clock advantage for the A10-6790B (base: 4 GHz vs 2.66 GHz). The A10-6790B uses the Richland (2013β2014) architecture (32 nm), while the Core 2 Duo E7300 uses Wolfdale (2008β2010) (45 nm). In PassMark, the A10-6790B scores 1,546 against the Core 2 Duo E7300's 1,555 β a 0.6% lead for the Core 2 Duo E7300.
| Feature | A10-6790B | Core 2 Duo E7300 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 4 / 4+100% | 2 / 2 |
| Boost Clock | 4.3 GHz+61% | 2.67 GHz |
| Base Clock | 4 GHz+50% | 2.66 GHz |
| L3 Cache | β | 0 kB |
| L2 Cache | 4096 kB+33% | 3 MB (total) |
| Process | 32 nm-29% | 45 nm |
| Architecture | Richland (2013β2014) | Wolfdale (2008β2010) |
| PassMark | 1,546 | 1,555 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | β | 412 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | β | 725 |
Memory & Platform
The A10-6790B uses the FM2 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core 2 Duo E7300 uses LGA775 (PCIe 1.1) β making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3-1866 on the A10-6790B versus DDR2-800 on the Core 2 Duo E7300 β the A10-6790B supports 133.3% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The A10-6790B supports up to 32 GB of RAM compared to 8 GB β 300% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 16 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: A55,A75,A85X,A78,A88X (A10-6790B) and P35,G33,G41,P45 (Core 2 Duo E7300).
| Feature | A10-6790B | Core 2 Duo E7300 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FM2 | LGA775 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0+173% | PCIe 1.1 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR3-1866+133% | DDR2-800 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 32 GB+300% | 8 GB |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | No | No |
| PCIe Lanes | 16 | 16 |
Advanced Features
Only the Core 2 Duo E7300 has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking β a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Virtualization support: AMD-V (A10-6790B) vs VT-x (Core 2 Duo E7300). The A10-6790B includes integrated graphics (Radeon HD 8670D), while the Core 2 Duo E7300 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: A10-6790B targets Office, Core 2 Duo E7300 targets Legacy Desktop. Direct competitor: A10-6790B rivals Core i3-4330; Core 2 Duo E7300 rivals Athlon II X2 245.
| Feature | A10-6790B | Core 2 Duo E7300 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | No |
| IGPU Model | Radeon HD 8670D | None |
| Unlocked | No | Yes |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | AMD-V | VT-x |
| Target Use | Office | Legacy Desktop |
Value Analysis
At launch, the A10-6790B was priced at $122, while the Core 2 Duo E7300 came in at $133. On launch pricing ($122 vs $133), A10-6790B was $11 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the A10-6790B delivers 12.7 pts/$ vs 11.7 pts/$ for the Core 2 Duo E7300 β making the A10-6790B the 8% better value option.
| Feature | A10-6790B | Core 2 Duo E7300 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $122-8% | $133 |
| Performance per Dollar | 12.7+9% | 11.7 |
| Release Date | 2013 | 2008 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
















