
A10-6790B vs Core 2 Duo E7300

A10-6790B

Core 2 Duo E7300
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The A10-6790B is positioned at rank 947 and the Core 2 Duo E7300 is on rank 969, so the A10-6790B offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar A10-6790B
Performance Per Dollar Core 2 Duo E7300
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | A10-6790B | Core 2 Duo E7300 |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ✅ Superior gaming performance | ❌ Lower gaming performance |
| Workstation | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks | ✅ Better multi-core power |
| Price | ✅ More affordable ($50) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($133) |
| Longevity | 🛑 Legacy (Richland (2013−2014) / 32 nm) | 🛑 Legacy (Wolfdale (2008−2010) / 45 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | A10-6790B | Core 2 Duo E7300 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅ Better overall value (+164%) | ❌ Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅ More affordable ($50) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($133) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of A10-6790B and Core 2 Duo E7300

A10-6790B
The A10-6790B is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Richland (2013−2014) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 4 GHz, with boost up to 4.3 GHz. L2 cache: 4096 kB. Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: FM2. Thermal design power (TDP): 100 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-1866. Passmark benchmark score: 1,546 points. Launch price was $130.

Core 2 Duo E7300
The Core 2 Duo E7300 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2008-01-01. It is based on the Wolfdale (2008−2010) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.66 GHz, with boost up to 2.67 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 3 MB (total). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: LGA775. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR1, DDR2, DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,555 points. Launch price was $249.
Processing Power
The A10-6790B packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Core 2 Duo E7300 offers 2 cores / 2 threads — the A10-6790B has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.3 GHz on the A10-6790B versus 2.67 GHz on the Core 2 Duo E7300 — a 46.8% clock advantage for the A10-6790B (base: 4 GHz vs 2.66 GHz). The A10-6790B uses the Richland (2013−2014) architecture (32 nm), while the Core 2 Duo E7300 uses Wolfdale (2008−2010) (45 nm). In PassMark, the A10-6790B scores 1,546 against the Core 2 Duo E7300's 1,555 — a 0.6% lead for the Core 2 Duo E7300.
| Feature | A10-6790B | Core 2 Duo E7300 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 4 / 4+100% | 2 / 2 |
| Boost Clock | 4.3 GHz+61% | 2.67 GHz |
| Base Clock | 4 GHz+50% | 2.66 GHz |
| L3 Cache | — | 0 kB |
| L2 Cache | 4096 kB+33% | 3 MB (total) |
| Process | 32 nm-29% | 45 nm |
| Architecture | Richland (2013−2014) | Wolfdale (2008−2010) |
| PassMark | 1,546 | 1,555 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | — | 412 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | — | 725 |
Memory & Platform
The A10-6790B uses the FM2 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core 2 Duo E7300 uses LGA775 (PCIe 1.1) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3-1866 on the A10-6790B versus DDR2-800 on the Core 2 Duo E7300 — the A10-6790B supports 40% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The A10-6790B supports up to 32 GB of RAM compared to 8 GB — 120% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 16 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: A55,A75,A85X,A78,A88X (A10-6790B) and P35,G33,G41,P45 (Core 2 Duo E7300).
| Feature | A10-6790B | Core 2 Duo E7300 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FM2 | LGA775 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0+173% | PCIe 1.1 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR3-1866+50% | DDR2-800 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 32 GB+300% | 8 GB |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | ❌ | ❌ |
| PCIe Lanes | 16 | 16 |
Advanced Features
Only the Core 2 Duo E7300 has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Virtualization support: AMD-V (A10-6790B) vs VT-x (Core 2 Duo E7300). The A10-6790B includes integrated graphics (Radeon HD 8670D), while the Core 2 Duo E7300 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: A10-6790B targets Office, Core 2 Duo E7300 targets Legacy Desktop. Direct competitor: A10-6790B rivals Core i3-4330; Core 2 Duo E7300 rivals Athlon II X2 245.
| Feature | A10-6790B | Core 2 Duo E7300 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | No |
| IGPU Model | Radeon HD 8670D | None |
| Unlocked | No | Yes |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | AMD-V | VT-x |
| Target Use | Office | Legacy Desktop |
Value Analysis
The A10-6790B launched at $122 MSRP, while the Core 2 Duo E7300 debuted at $133. At current prices ($50 vs $133), the A10-6790B is $83 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the A10-6790B delivers 30.9 pts/$ vs 11.7 pts/$ for the Core 2 Duo E7300 — making the A10-6790B the 90.2% better value option.
| Feature | A10-6790B | Core 2 Duo E7300 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $122-8% | $133 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $50-62% | $133 |
| Performance per Dollar | 30.9+164% | 11.7 |
| Release Date | 2013 | 2008 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












