A10-6790B vs Xeon E5335

A10-6790B vs Xeon E5335 Performance Spectrum

A10-6790B

4 / 4

1,546

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5945WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Xeon E5335

4 / 4

1,549

+0.2%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

A10-6790B vs Xeon E5335 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

A10-6790B vs Xeon E5335: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

A10-6790B

2013

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +3.0% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon HD 8670D, while Xeon E5335 needs a discrete GPU.
✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Xeon E5335.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (1,546 vs 1,549).
❌Launch MSRP is still $122 MSRP, while Xeon E5335 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌25% higher power demand at 100W vs 80W.

Xeon E5335

2006

Why buy it

✅+0.2% higher PassMark.
✅Draws 80W instead of 100W, a 20W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than A10-6790B across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌No integrated graphics, while A10-6790B can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike A10-6790B.

Quick Answers

So, is A10-6790B better than Xeon E5335?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon E5335 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while A10-6790B is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon E5335 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.2% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

A10-6790B is the better buy right now. A10-6790B comes in at an unclear MSRP at $122 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 3.0% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. The compromise is that Xeon E5335 is still stronger for heavier multi-core work with 0.2% better PassMark. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (12.7 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

A10-6790B makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2013 vs 2006). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

A10-6790B vs Xeon E5335 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

A10-6790B

The A10-6790B is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Richland (2013−2014) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 4 GHz, with boost up to 4.3 GHz. L2 cache: 4096 kB. Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: FM2. Thermal design power (TDP): 100 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-1866. Passmark benchmark score: 1,546 points. Launch price was $130.

Xeon E5335

The Xeon E5335 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Clovertown (2006−2007) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 2 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB L2 Cache. L2 cache: 4 MB (total). Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: LGA771. Thermal design power (TDP): 80 Watt. Memory support: DDR2, DDR3 Depends on motherboard. Passmark benchmark score: 1,549 points. Launch price was $800.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the A10-6790B and Xeon E5335 share an identical 4-core/4-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 4.3 GHz on the A10-6790B versus 2 GHz on the Xeon E5335 — a 73% clock advantage for the A10-6790B (base: 4 GHz vs 2 GHz). The A10-6790B uses the Richland (2013−2014) architecture (32 nm), while the Xeon E5335 uses Clovertown (2006−2007) (65 nm). In PassMark, the A10-6790B scores 1,546 against the Xeon E5335's 1,549 — a 0.2% lead for the Xeon E5335.

Feature	A10-6790B	Xeon E5335
Cores / Threads	4 / 4	4 / 4
Boost Clock	4.3 GHz+115%	2 GHz
Base Clock	4 GHz+100%	2 GHz
L3 Cache	—	8 MB L2 Cache
L2 Cache	4096 kB	4 MB (total)
Process	32 nm-51%	65 nm
Architecture	Richland (2013−2014)	Clovertown (2006−2007)
PassMark	1,546	1,549

🧠

Memory & Platform

The A10-6790B uses the FM2 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon E5335 uses LGA771 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	A10-6790B	Xeon E5335
Socket	FM2	LGA771
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0+50%	PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR3-1866	—
Max RAM Capacity	32 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	No	—
PCIe Lanes	16	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: AMD-V (A10-6790B) / not specified (Xeon E5335). The A10-6790B includes integrated graphics (Radeon HD 8670D), while the Xeon E5335 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: A10-6790B targets Office. Direct competitor: A10-6790B rivals Core i3-4330.