Core i3-2348M vs Core i3-2350M

Intel

Core i3-2348M

2 Cores4 Thrd512 WWMax: 2.3 GHz2013
Similar parts
·······
VS
Intel

Core i3-2350M

2 Cores4 Thrd512 WWMax: 2.3 GHz2011

Core i3-2348M vs Core i3-2350M Performance Spectrum

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i3-2348M vs Core i3-2350M FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i3-2348M vs Core i3-2350M: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i3-2348M

2013

Why buy it

  • +0.8% higher PassMark.

Trade-offs

  • Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.

Core i3-2350M

2011

Why buy it

    Trade-offs

    • Lower PassMark (1,276 vs 1,286).

    Quick Answers

    So, is Core i3-2348M better than Core i3-2350M?
    Yes. Core i3-2348M is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 0.3% average FPS lead across 40 shared CPU game tests in our data, 0.8% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.
    Which one is better for gaming?
    For gaming, this matchup is basically a tie in the data we have.
    Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
    For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i3-2348M is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.8% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 4 threads.
    Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
    Core i3-2348M still makes the most sense overall. Core i3-2348M comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 0.3% average FPS lead across 40 shared CPU game tests in our data.
    Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
    Core i3-2348M makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2013 vs 2011) and more multi-core headroom with 2 cores / 4 threads instead of 2/4. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

    Core i3-2348M vs Core i3-2350M Technical Specifications

    Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

    Intel

    Core i3-2348M

    The Core i3-2348M is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 January 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.3 GHz, with boost up to 2.3 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: PGA988. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,286 points. Launch price was $225.

    Intel

    Core i3-2350M

    The Core i3-2350M is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 October 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.3 GHz, with boost up to 2.3 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: PGA988. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,276 points. Launch price was $225.

    Processing Power

    Both the Core i3-2348M and Core i3-2350M share an identical 2-core/4-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 2.3 GHz on the Core i3-2348M versus 2.3 GHz on the Core i3-2350M — identical boost frequencies (base: 2.3 GHz vs 2.3 GHz). Both are built on the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture using a 32 nm process. In PassMark, the Core i3-2348M scores 1,286 against the Core i3-2350M's 1,276 — a 0.8% lead for the Core i3-2348M. L3 cache: 3 MB on the Core i3-2348M vs 3 MB (total) on the Core i3-2350M.

    FeatureCore i3-2348MCore i3-2350M
    Cores / Threads
    2 / 4
    2 / 4
    Boost Clock
    2.3 GHz
    2.3 GHz
    Base Clock
    2.3 GHz
    2.3 GHz
    L3 Cache
    3 MB
    3 MB (total)
    L2 Cache
    512 kB+100%
    256K (per core)
    Process
    32 nm
    32 nm
    Architecture
    Sandy Bridge (2011−2013)
    Sandy Bridge (2011−2013)
    PassMark
    1,286
    1,276
    Geekbench 6 Single
    390
    Geekbench 6 Multi
    806
    🧠

    Memory & Platform

    Both processors use the PGA988 socket with PCIe 2.0. Both support up to 1333 memory speed. Both support up to 16 GB of RAM. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 16 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: HM65,HM67,QM67,QS67 (Core i3-2348M) and HM65,HM67,QM67 (Core i3-2350M).

    FeatureCore i3-2348MCore i3-2350M
    Socket
    PGA988
    PGA988
    PCIe Generation
    PCIe 2.0
    PCIe 2.0
    Max RAM Speed
    1333
    DDR3-1333
    Max RAM Capacity
    16 GB
    16 GB
    RAM Channels
    2
    2
    ECC Support
    No
    No
    PCIe Lanes
    16
    16
    🔧

    Advanced Features

    Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: true (Core i3-2348M) vs VT-x (Core i3-2350M). Both include integrated graphics Intel HD Graphics 3000 (Core i3-2348M) and Intel HD Graphics 3000 (Core i3-2350M) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i3-2350M targets Laptop. Direct competitor: Core i3-2348M rivals Core i3-2330M.

    FeatureCore i3-2348MCore i3-2350M
    Integrated GPU
    Yes
    Yes
    IGPU Model
    Intel HD Graphics 3000
    Intel HD Graphics 3000
    Unlocked
    No
    No
    AVX-512
    No
    No
    Virtualization
    true
    VT-x
    Target Use
    Laptop