Core i3-2348M vs Pentium Dual Core T4400

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i3-2348M vs Pentium Dual Core T4400 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i3-2348M vs Pentium Dual Core T4400: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i3-2348M

2013

Why buy it

✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel HD Graphics 3000, while Pentium Dual Core T4400 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌1362.9% higher power demand at 512W vs 35W.

Pentium Dual Core T4400

2009

Why buy it

✅Draws 35W instead of 512W, a 477W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (1,284 vs 1,286).
❌Launch MSRP is still $107 MSRP, while Core i3-2348M mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌No integrated graphics, while Core i3-2348M can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i3-2348M better than Pentium Dual Core T4400?

Yes. Core i3-2348M is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 1.7% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 0.2% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Core i3-2348M is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 1.7% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i3-2348M is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.2% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i3-2348M is still the much better call for a fresh build. Core i3-2348M comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $107 MSRP, and it still gives you a 1.7% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Pentium Dual Core T4400 only looks stronger on raw value math because it is extremely cheap, but that usually means used-market pricing on an obsolete 2009 platform. Even with 100.0% better value on paper (12.0 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), it really only makes sense as a cheap stopgap or a niche existing-platform option for someone already on P.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i3-2348M makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2013 vs 2009) and more multi-core headroom with 2 cores / 4 threads instead of 2/2. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Core i3-2348M vs Pentium Dual Core T4400 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i3-2348M

The Core i3-2348M is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 January 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.3 GHz, with boost up to 2.3 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: PGA988. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,286 points. Launch price was $225.

Pentium Dual Core T4400

The Pentium Dual Core T4400 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the NetBurst (2000−2006) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 2.2 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: P. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,284 points. Launch price was $69.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i3-2348M packs 2 cores / 4 threads, matching the Pentium Dual Core T4400's 2 cores. Boost clocks reach 2.3 GHz on the Core i3-2348M versus 2.2 GHz on the Pentium Dual Core T4400 — a 4.4% clock advantage for the Core i3-2348M (base: 2.3 GHz vs 2.2 GHz). The Core i3-2348M uses the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture (32 nm), while the Pentium Dual Core T4400 uses NetBurst (2000−2006) (45 nm). In PassMark, the Core i3-2348M scores 1,286 against the Pentium Dual Core T4400's 1,284 — a 0.2% lead for the Core i3-2348M. L3 cache: 3 MB on the Core i3-2348M vs 0 kB on the Pentium Dual Core T4400.

Feature	Core i3-2348M	Pentium Dual Core T4400
Cores / Threads	2 / 4	2 / 2
Boost Clock	2.3 GHz+5%	2.2 GHz
Base Clock	2.3 GHz+5%	2.2 GHz
L3 Cache	3 MB	0 kB
L2 Cache	512 kB	1 MB+100%
Process	32 nm-29%	45 nm
Architecture	Sandy Bridge (2011−2013)	NetBurst (2000−2006)
PassMark	1,286	1,284

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i3-2348M uses the PGA988 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Pentium Dual Core T4400 uses P (PCIe 1.1) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Core i3-2348M	Pentium Dual Core T4400
Socket	PGA988	P
PCIe Generation	PCIe 2.0+82%	PCIe 1.1
Max RAM Speed	1333	—
Max RAM Capacity	16	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	No	—
PCIe Lanes	16	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: true (Core i3-2348M) / not specified (Pentium Dual Core T4400). The Core i3-2348M includes integrated graphics (Intel HD Graphics 3000), while the Pentium Dual Core T4400 requires a dedicated GPU. Direct competitor: Core i3-2348M rivals Core i3-2330M.