Core i3-330UM vs Core i3-2348M

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i3-330UM vs Core i3-2348M FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i3-330UM vs Core i3-2348M: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i3-330UM

2010

Why buy it

✅+0.9% higher PassMark.

Trade-offs

❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.

Core i3-2348M

2013

Why buy it

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (1,286 vs 1,297).

Quick Answers

So, is Core i3-330UM better than Core i3-2348M?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Core i3-2348M is ahead with a 0.5% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Core i3-330UM pulls ahead with 0.9% better PassMark.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i3-330UM is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.9% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i3-330UM still makes the most sense overall. Core i3-330UM comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you 0.9% better PassMark.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i3-2348M makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2013 vs 2010). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Core i3-330UM vs Core i3-2348M Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i3-330UM

The Core i3-330UM is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 24 May 2010 (15 years ago). It is based on the Arrandale (2010−2011) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.2 GHz, with boost up to 0.1 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1288. Thermal design power (TDP): 18 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,297 points. Launch price was $69.

Core i3-2348M

The Core i3-2348M is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 January 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.3 GHz, with boost up to 2.3 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: PGA988. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,286 points. Launch price was $225.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Core i3-330UM and Core i3-2348M share an identical 2-core/4-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 0.1 GHz on the Core i3-330UM versus 2.3 GHz on the Core i3-2348M — a 183.3% clock advantage for the Core i3-2348M (base: 1.2 GHz vs 2.3 GHz). The Core i3-330UM uses the Arrandale (2010−2011) architecture (32 nm), while the Core i3-2348M uses Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Core i3-330UM scores 1,297 against the Core i3-2348M's 1,286 — a 0.9% lead for the Core i3-330UM. Both processors carry 3 MB of L3 cache.

Feature	Core i3-330UM	Core i3-2348M
Cores / Threads	2 / 4	2 / 4
Boost Clock	0.1 GHz	2.3 GHz+2200%
Base Clock	1.2 GHz	2.3 GHz+92%
L3 Cache	3 MB	3 MB
L2 Cache	512 kB	512 kB
Process	32 nm	32 nm
Architecture	Arrandale (2010−2011)	Sandy Bridge (2011−2013)
PassMark	1,297	1,286
Geekbench 6 Single	300	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	600	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i3-330UM uses the BGA1288 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Core i3-2348M uses PGA988 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3-800 on the Core i3-330UM versus 1333 on the Core i3-2348M — the Core i3-2348M supports 66.6% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Core i3-2348M supports up to 16 GB of RAM compared to 8 GB — 100% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 16 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: HM55 (Core i3-330UM) and HM65,HM67,QM67,QS67 (Core i3-2348M).

Feature	Core i3-330UM	Core i3-2348M
Socket	BGA1288	PGA988
PCIe Generation	PCIe 2.0	PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR3-800	1333+67%
Max RAM Capacity	8 GB	16 GB+100%
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	No	No
PCIe Lanes	16	16

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (Core i3-330UM) vs true (Core i3-2348M). Both include integrated graphics — Intel HD Graphics (Core i3-330UM) and Intel HD Graphics 3000 (Core i3-2348M) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i3-330UM targets Legacy Laptop. Direct competitor: Core i3-330UM rivals Pentium SU7300; Core i3-2348M rivals Core i3-2330M.