Core i3-330UM vs Xeon E3110

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i3-330UM vs Xeon E3110 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i3-330UM vs Xeon E3110: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i3-330UM

2010

Why buy it

✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel HD Graphics, while Xeon E3110 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Smaller total L3 cache (3 MB vs 6 MB).
❌687.7% higher power demand at 512W vs 65W.

Xeon E3110

2008

Why buy it

✅+100% larger total L3 cache (6 MB vs 3 MB).
✅Draws 65W instead of 512W, a 447W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (1,295 vs 1,297).
❌Launch MSRP is still $214 MSRP, while Core i3-330UM mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌No integrated graphics, while Core i3-330UM can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i3-330UM better than Xeon E3110?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon E3110 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Core i3-330UM is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Core i3-330UM is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 1.3% more average FPS across 22 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i3-330UM is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.2% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i3-330UM is still the faster CPU overall, but Xeon E3110 is easier to justify if budget matters more than peak performance. Core i3-330UM comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $214 MSRP, and it still gives you a 1.3% average FPS lead across 22 shared CPU game tests in our data. Xeon E3110 is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (6.1 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), which is why it can still make sense for tighter-budget builds on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i3-330UM makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2010 vs 2008). That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Core i3-330UM vs Xeon E3110 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i3-330UM

The Core i3-330UM is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 24 May 2010 (15 years ago). It is based on the Arrandale (2010−2011) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.2 GHz, with boost up to 0.1 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1288. Thermal design power (TDP): 18 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,297 points. Launch price was $69.

Xeon E3110

The Xeon E3110 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. Base frequency: 3 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB L2 Cache. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: LGA775. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 1,295 points. Launch price was $800.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i3-330UM is built on the Arrandale (2010−2011) architecture. In PassMark, the Core i3-330UM scores 1,297 against the Xeon E3110's 1,295 — a 0.2% lead for the Core i3-330UM. L3 cache: 3 MB on the Core i3-330UM vs 6 MB L2 Cache on the Xeon E3110.

Feature	Core i3-330UM	Xeon E3110
Cores / Threads	2 / 4	—
Boost Clock	0.1 GHz	—
Base Clock	1.2 GHz	3 GHz+150%
L3 Cache	3 MB	6 MB L2 Cache+100%
L2 Cache	512 kB	—
Process	32 nm-29%	45 nm
Architecture	Arrandale (2010−2011)	—
PassMark	1,297	1,295
Geekbench 6 Single	300	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	600	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i3-330UM uses the BGA1288 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Xeon E3110 uses LGA775 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Core i3-330UM	Xeon E3110
Socket	BGA1288	LGA775
PCIe Generation	PCIe 2.0	PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR3-800	—
Max RAM Capacity	8 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	No	—
PCIe Lanes	16	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d (Core i3-330UM) / not specified (Xeon E3110). The Core i3-330UM includes integrated graphics (Intel HD Graphics), while the Xeon E3110 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i3-330UM targets Legacy Laptop. Direct competitor: Core i3-330UM rivals Pentium SU7300.