Core i3-330UM vs Pentium E5200

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i3-330UM vs Pentium E5200 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i3-330UM vs Pentium E5200: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i3-330UM

2010

Why buy it

✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel HD Graphics, while Pentium E5200 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Pentium E5200 across 45 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (1,297 vs 1,315).
❌687.7% higher power demand at 512W vs 65W.

Pentium E5200

2008

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +5.5% higher average FPS across 45 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Draws 65W instead of 512W, a 447W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Launch MSRP is still $84 MSRP, while Core i3-330UM mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌No integrated graphics, while Core i3-330UM can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Pentium E5200 better than Core i3-330UM?

Yes. Pentium E5200 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 5.5% average FPS lead across 45 shared CPU game tests in our data and 1.4% better PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Pentium E5200 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 5.5% more average FPS across 45 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Pentium E5200 is the stronger fit. You are getting 1.4% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 2 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Pentium E5200 is the better buy right now. Pentium E5200 comes in at an unclear MSRP at $84 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 5.5% average FPS lead across 45 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (15.7 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i3-330UM makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2010 vs 2008). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Core i3-330UM vs Pentium E5200 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i3-330UM

The Core i3-330UM is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 24 May 2010 (15 years ago). It is based on the Arrandale (2010−2011) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.2 GHz, with boost up to 0.1 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1288. Thermal design power (TDP): 18 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,297 points. Launch price was $69.

Pentium E5200

The Pentium E5200 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in Agosto 2008 (17 years ago). It is based on the Wolfdale (2008−2010) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 2.5 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 2 MB (total). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: LGA775. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR1, DDR2, DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,315 points. Launch price was $99.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i3-330UM packs 2 cores / 4 threads, matching the Pentium E5200's 2 cores. Boost clocks reach 0.1 GHz on the Core i3-330UM versus 2.5 GHz on the Pentium E5200 — a 184.6% clock advantage for the Pentium E5200 (base: 1.2 GHz vs 2.5 GHz). The Core i3-330UM uses the Arrandale (2010−2011) architecture (32 nm), while the Pentium E5200 uses Wolfdale (2008−2010) (45 nm). In PassMark, the Core i3-330UM scores 1,297 against the Pentium E5200's 1,315 — a 1.4% lead for the Pentium E5200. L3 cache: 3 MB on the Core i3-330UM vs 0 kB on the Pentium E5200.

Feature	Core i3-330UM	Pentium E5200
Cores / Threads	2 / 4	2 / 2
Boost Clock	0.1 GHz	2.5 GHz+2400%
Base Clock	1.2 GHz	2.5 GHz+108%
L3 Cache	3 MB	0 kB
L2 Cache	512 kB	2 MB (total)+300%
Process	32 nm-29%	45 nm
Architecture	Arrandale (2010−2011)	Wolfdale (2008−2010)
PassMark	1,297	1,315+1%
Geekbench 6 Single	300	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	600	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i3-330UM uses the BGA1288 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Pentium E5200 uses LGA775 (PCIe 1.1) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Core i3-330UM	Pentium E5200
Socket	BGA1288	LGA775
PCIe Generation	PCIe 2.0+82%	PCIe 1.1
Max RAM Speed	DDR3-800	—
Max RAM Capacity	8 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	No	—
PCIe Lanes	16	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d (Core i3-330UM) / not specified (Pentium E5200). The Core i3-330UM includes integrated graphics (Intel HD Graphics), while the Pentium E5200 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i3-330UM targets Legacy Laptop. Direct competitor: Core i3-330UM rivals Pentium SU7300.